|
Post by Jedan Archer on Aug 23, 2017 12:12:59 GMT
Speaking about cockroaches, well you keep proving your status as an intellectual insect, the light you shed is thus very dim, alas...
1. You seem to be unable to quote properly when responding. Only when quoting the other poster s/he will be informed about your message. Or alternatively you tag the addressee by user name. Everybody here gets that except you. So, I assume a certain quantum of cowardice like with people unable to look you into the eyes. Look I do it too now, how long did it take to find it?
2. As for your question, I do not care about the exact workings of comparative methods like the Bayesian one. I am not under any obligation to prove anything, the onus is on you to prove your personal incredulity. Ignorance is no proof btw.
3. Apart from that, my common sense as a lawyer (it's similar to a spider sense) tells me that RT/its agents do a sound job. This is based on the following:
(i) You are a biased fanboy with personal incredulity misconceptions. (ii) You have a poor understanding of comparative methods. Someone who is even suggesting to better use random, unweighted scores to compare - because it suits your bias I guess. (iii) You did not postulate a clear allegation, nor any evidence to corroborate it. (vi) You did not even bother to contact stats professionals or the list publisher (RT), just satisfied with crying foul and whining amongst fanboy amateurs like yourself. (v) RT does this with hundreds of lists since many years based on established stats methods, and there never seemed to to be any issues until your butt hurt arose.
Thus, as long as no evidence to the contrary is presented, based on your intellectual status I will assume that your poorly argued allegations are unfounded and that the list is fair and sound. This was fun, anytime again - provided you learn to quote.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Aug 23, 2017 17:21:33 GMT
Holy Smokes ... you've got quite the petty grievance theater going on there, cupcake! What's the matter, too witless to return to a thread on your own? Or are you one of those lawyers* who spends so much time on comic book superhero forums that you need help keeping it all straight? Normally, I'd be inclined to lend a hand ... if you had asked nice. But you didn't, so you must suffer the consequences. Your only obligation is to your own credibility. If you didn't know what you were talking about, it would have been best to just zip it and suck up the butt-hurt I inflicted upon you. Didn't they teach you that sort of thing in lawyer* school? .... should have told you to cut your losses. Now we get to laugh at you twice for the same offense! *
|
|
|
Post by Jedan Archer on Aug 23, 2017 20:56:30 GMT
Holy Smokes ... you've got quite the petty grievance theater going on there, cupcake! What's the matter, too witless to return to a thread on your own? Or are you one of those lawyers* who spends so much time on comic book superhero forums that you need help keeping it all straight? Normally, I'd be inclined to lend a hand ... if you had asked nice. But you didn't, so you must suffer the consequences. Your only obligation is to your own credibility. If you didn't know what you were talking about, it would have been best to just zip it and suck up the butt-hurt I inflicted upon you. Didn't they teach you that sort of thing in lawyer* school? .... should have told you to cut your losses. Now we get to laugh at you twice for the same offense! LOL at how drama queen-ish you got. I will remember to duck and cover next time you throw your foul eggs in one of your hissy fits. It's called "law school" btw.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Aug 23, 2017 23:33:24 GMT
Oh looky ... someone figured out how to return to a thread, all by their lonesome. Well done, dude. You get a cookie!
Only if it's a real law school. Lawyer school is one of the places internet comic book fanboys go for their unverifiable credentials ... in a vain effort to impress someone online. ... Has it ever worked?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 24, 2017 3:39:56 GMT
Wonder Woman is already the #1 movie of the summer and #2 movie so far this year (behind only Beauty and the Beast). Now Wonder Woman (with an RT adjusted score of 106.491%) has also moved past Logan (with an RT adjusted score of 106.487%) to become the #1 best superhero movie of all-time. 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time I wonder what the new DC cinematic universe will be like.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 14, 2017 0:30:59 GMT
* Currently, Rotten Tomatoes is rounding WW up to 92% and Spiderman down to 92% WRONG!!!
Wonder Woman's RT rating is 320 fresh out of 347, which is 92.22%. SMH's RT rating is 272 fresh out of 295, which is 92.20%.
So Wonder Woman not only has a higher RT rating than SMH, Wonder Woman also has the highest RT adjusted score: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. And Wonder Woman is also a contender for a Best Picture Oscar nomination.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Oct 14, 2017 0:58:12 GMT
* Currently, Rotten Tomatoes is rounding WW up to 92% and Spiderman down to 92% WRONG!!!
Wonder Woman's RT rating is 320 fresh out of 347, which is 92.22%. SMH's RT rating is 272 fresh out of 295, which is 92.20%.
So Wonder Woman not only has a higher RT rating than SMH, Wonder Woman also has the highest RT adjusted score: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. And Wonder Woman is also a contender for a Best Picture Oscar nomination.
Ooh, a .02% difference. Who gives a shit? Also thanks for admitting that Spider-Man: Homecoming is fresh and a good movie.
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Oct 14, 2017 1:51:19 GMT
Wonder Woman average critic rating on RT = 7.6/10
The Dark Knight average critic rating on RT = 8.6/10
Fatality.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Oct 14, 2017 2:33:32 GMT
Ooh, a .02% difference. Who gives a shit? King Kong Shady, that's who. King Kong Shady kept saying that WW's RT rating was being rounded up and that SMH's RT rating was higher by a few percentage points. But that's false. WW's RT rating is higher than SMH's RT rating. And WW's RT adjusted score is the highest among all superhero movies: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. And WW is also a contender for a Best Picture Oscar nomination.
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Oct 14, 2017 2:46:45 GMT
Wonder Woman average critic rating on RT = 7.6/10 The Dark Knight average critic rating on RT = 8.6/10 Fatality. I think we can all agree they are both very good movies. I prefer The Dark Knight personally but Wonder Woman is also very entertaining. Gal Godot is much prettier than Christian Bale though. IMO.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Oct 14, 2017 12:24:23 GMT
* Currently, Rotten Tomatoes is rounding WW up to 92% and Spiderman down to 92% WRONG!!!
Wonder Woman's RT rating is 320 fresh out of 347, which is 92.22%. SMH's RT rating is 272 fresh out of 295, which is 92.20%.
So Wonder Woman not only has a higher RT rating than SMH, Wonder Woman also has the highest RT adjusted score: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. And Wonder Woman is also a contender for a Best Picture Oscar nomination.
Oh dear ... my post from August so distressed DC-Fanboy that he's been keeping an eagle eye on the Tomato-meter all this time ... crunching the numbers every day ... hoping for a reversal of fortune. And sure enough, WW has finally crept past SMH by 0.02%. Imagine, being consumed with such anger over a post ... for two whole months! Hey champ, thanks for alerting the forum that my post got under your skin so effectively. LOL! So ... DC's best superhero movie has limped past "the worst of the Spider-Man movies" (according to DC-Fanboy) on RT. I think that deserves a big ol' congratulations! ::golf clap:: Lord knows DC fans need something positive to grasp onto, no matter how infinitesimally small. The upcoming Justice League v Thor Ragnarok must have them sweating bullets.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Feb 22, 2018 21:57:08 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2018 22:30:09 GMT
Ooh, a .02% difference. Who gives a shit? King Kong Shady, that's who. King Kong Shady kept saying that WW's RT rating was being rounded up and that SMH's RT rating was higher by a few percentage points. But that's false. WW's RT rating is higher than SMH's RT rating. And WW's RT adjusted score is the highest among all superhero movies: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. And WW is also a contender for a Best Picture Oscar nomination. Dude, I have tried clicking that link a number of times now and it never comes up with WW being the number one superhero movie of all time.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Feb 24, 2018 1:35:35 GMT
King Kong Shady, that's who. King Kong Shady kept saying that WW's RT rating was being rounded up and that SMH's RT rating was higher by a few percentage points. But that's false. WW's RT rating is higher than SMH's RT rating. And WW's RT adjusted score is the highest among all superhero movies: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. And WW is also a contender for a Best Picture Oscar nomination. Dude, I have tried clicking that link a number of times now and it never comes up with WW being the number one superhero movie of all time. They need to redo that list because Guardians has a higher score than DoFP.
|
|
|
Post by outrider127 on Feb 24, 2018 21:01:07 GMT
Very impressed with the first 45 minutes, on the idyllic island--after that, grim and depressing WW I--then a good ending with Aries--Gal Gadot great
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Feb 26, 2018 10:34:37 GMT
I've noticed the list has expanded from 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time to 60....and still only one DCEU film in there.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Feb 28, 2018 4:56:12 GMT
So DC-Fan... what have you got to say now that BP is now the best superhero movie of all time?
|
|