|
Post by politicidal on Apr 27, 2018 0:32:20 GMT
Just caught it last night on TCM. It was based off the same Hemingway novel as TO HAVE AND TO HAVE NOT (1944) but supposedly more faithful than the latter. Starring John Garfield and Patricia Neal, it's about a boat captain forced into criminal activity and the pressure keeps piling up on him. I've been mentioning Michael Curtiz a lot lately and this is one of the later one of his films I've seen. Great acting all the way around, from Garfield and Neal to supporters like Phyllis Thaxter and Juano Hernandez; even the child actors are solid. Patricia Neal especially was dynamite as the sultry Leona Charles.
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Apr 27, 2018 1:21:17 GMT
politicidal Yes, although there are naturally some changes for the movies, this film in most of its essentials represents what Hemingway wrote. (I read the 1937 source novel, “To Have and Have Not,” in anticipation of seeing this film.) The setting has been moved from the book's Key West and Cuba to the southern California coast and Mexico. John Garfield stars as Harry Morgan and is just about perfect. Like his novelistic counterpart, he is married (Phyllis Thaxter) with two young daughters (Sherry Jackson and Donna Jo Boyce). Three years later, Jackson would become a TV celebrity as Danny Thomas’ daughter on “Make Room For Daddy.” A new character added for the film is the blond-bombshell, Leona (Patricia Neal), who throws herself at Harry, adding more tension to Morgan’s marriage. Neal gives us a much more layered characterization than many other actresses would, showing small signs that Leona is not happy with the way her life has gone. Basically, Curtiz has directed a screenplay that is a very close approximation to what Ernest Hemingway wrote, plotwise. It is also a fine movie on its own, with several noir touches and some very tense scenes. The ending of this film is ambiguous (a cop-out?) while Papa Hemingway’s is not. The final shoot-out on the boat (from film and book) may also remind you of the gunfight that wraps up John Huston’s “Key Largo” from 1948.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Apr 27, 2018 1:23:43 GMT
Just caught it last night on TCM. It was based off the same Hemingway novel as TO HAVE AND TO HAVE NOT (1944) but supposedly more faithful than the latter. Starring John Garfield and Patricia Neal, it's about a boat captain forced into criminal activity and the pressure keeps piling up on him. I've been mentioning Michael Curtiz a lot lately and this is one of the later one of his films I've seen. Great acting all the way around, from Garfield and Neal to supporters like Phyllis Thaxter and Juano Hernandez; even the child actors are solid. Patricia Neal especially was dynamite as the sultry Leona Charles. I am surprised Garfield never set the world on fire more at all.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 27, 2018 1:25:41 GMT
Just caught it last night on TCM. It was based off the same Hemingway novel as TO HAVE AND TO HAVE NOT (1944) but supposedly more faithful than the latter. Starring John Garfield and Patricia Neal, it's about a boat captain forced into criminal activity and the pressure keeps piling up on him. I've been mentioning Michael Curtiz a lot lately and this is one of the later one of his films I've seen. Great acting all the way around, from Garfield and Neal to supporters like Phyllis Thaxter and Juano Hernandez; even the child actors are solid. Patricia Neal especially was dynamite as the sultry Leona Charles. I am surprised Garfield never set the world on fire more at all. Apparently the whole shitstorm regarding reds, HUAC, McCarthy, and the blacklist got to him. Damn shame.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Apr 27, 2018 1:26:06 GMT
I am surprised Garfield never set the world on fire more at all. Apparently the whole shitstorm regarding reds, HUAC, McCarthy, and the blacklist got to him. Damn shame. that explains that damn.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 27, 2018 1:57:29 GMT
Apparently the whole shitstorm regarding reds, HUAC, McCarthy, and the blacklist got to him. Damn shame. that explains that damn. Agreed. I kind would like a remake or a new adaptation updated for today. The subplots about working class woes, aside rumination of the ideal woman, organized crime facilitating illegal immigration really all seem so timely today.
|
|