Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2018 12:07:22 GMT
... but what if there is no thinking involved? :'-} Zinke and Lamar Alexander's Big Plan? We Must Kill the Planet to Save the National ParksNew joint op-ed touts legislation that would fund national parks' infrastructure repairs with leases for oil and gas drilling by Andrea Germanos, staff writer Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke joined with U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) to argue that the best way to fix the national parks is by pillaging public lands for fossil fuels. Their CNN op-ed published Wednesday focuses on the $11.6 billion repair backlog the parks face—"our parks are being loved to death," they write. They say revenue to address the infrastructure repairs can come through their proposed legislation, the National Park Restoration Act (S.2509). Lamar is the sponsor of the bipartisan legislation, which he introduced at the behest of Zinke, and as the Interior Department noted in a press release, it "follows the blueprint laid out in Secretary Zinke and President Trump's budget proposal, the Public Lands Infrastructure Fund." As Zinke and Lamar, lay out: These revenues will come from energy leases on all onshore and offshore sources of energy production on federal land: oil, gas, coal, renewables, and alternative energy. The fund would receive 50 percent of onshore and offshore revenues from energy production on federal lands over expected amounts that are not already allocated to other purposes. Environmental groups have long cautioned against fueling the climate crisis with fossil fuel extraction on public lands—producton Zinke is pushing to make easier. Read the rest here.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 4, 2018 18:11:03 GMT
... but what if there is no thinking involved? :'-} Zinke and Lamar Alexander's Big Plan? We Must Kill the Planet to Save the National ParksNew joint op-ed touts legislation that would fund national parks' infrastructure repairs with leases for oil and gas drilling by Andrea Germanos, staff writer Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke joined with U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) to argue that the best way to fix the national parks is by pillaging public lands for fossil fuels. Their CNN op-ed published Wednesday focuses on the $11.6 billion repair backlog the parks face—"our parks are being loved to death," they write. They say revenue to address the infrastructure repairs can come through their proposed legislation, the National Park Restoration Act (S.2509). Lamar is the sponsor of the bipartisan legislation, which he introduced at the behest of Zinke, and as the Interior Department noted in a press release, it "follows the blueprint laid out in Secretary Zinke and President Trump's budget proposal, the Public Lands Infrastructure Fund." As Zinke and Lamar, lay out: These revenues will come from energy leases on all onshore and offshore sources of energy production on federal land: oil, gas, coal, renewables, and alternative energy. The fund would receive 50 percent of onshore and offshore revenues from energy production on federal lands over expected amounts that are not already allocated to other purposes. Environmental groups have long cautioned against fueling the climate crisis with fossil fuel extraction on public lands—producton Zinke is pushing to make easier. Read the rest here. I have never understood conservatives fascination with promoting oil, gas and other such industries that are based on non-renewable sources of energy. In Australia, the big 3 energy companies literally destroyed the wind energy industry during the time of Tony Abbot. I frankly don't see much hope in the plan proposed by Zinke and Alexander.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 4, 2018 19:00:31 GMT
... but what if there is no thinking involved? :'-} Zinke and Lamar Alexander's Big Plan? We Must Kill the Planet to Save the National ParksNew joint op-ed touts legislation that would fund national parks' infrastructure repairs with leases for oil and gas drilling by Andrea Germanos, staff writer Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke joined with U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) to argue that the best way to fix the national parks is by pillaging public lands for fossil fuels. Their CNN op-ed published Wednesday focuses on the $11.6 billion repair backlog the parks face—"our parks are being loved to death," they write. They say revenue to address the infrastructure repairs can come through their proposed legislation, the National Park Restoration Act (S.2509). Lamar is the sponsor of the bipartisan legislation, which he introduced at the behest of Zinke, and as the Interior Department noted in a press release, it "follows the blueprint laid out in Secretary Zinke and President Trump's budget proposal, the Public Lands Infrastructure Fund." As Zinke and Lamar, lay out: These revenues will come from energy leases on all onshore and offshore sources of energy production on federal land: oil, gas, coal, renewables, and alternative energy. The fund would receive 50 percent of onshore and offshore revenues from energy production on federal lands over expected amounts that are not already allocated to other purposes. Environmental groups have long cautioned against fueling the climate crisis with fossil fuel extraction on public lands—producton Zinke is pushing to make easier. Read the rest here. I have never understood conservatives fascination with promoting oil, gas and other such industries that are based on non-renewable sources of energy. In Australia, the big 3 energy companies literally destroyed the wind energy industry during the time of Tony Abbot. I frankly don't see much hope in the plan proposed by Zinke and Alexander. I suppose their party has long been driven by the largest corporate funders (Exxon, the Kochs, etc,) who have managed to invest their workers in their cause -- It does look like this influence is waning, though.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 4, 2018 19:17:38 GMT
I have never understood conservatives fascination with promoting oil, gas and other such industries that are based on non-renewable sources of energy. In Australia, the big 3 energy companies literally destroyed the wind energy industry during the time of Tony Abbot. I frankly don't see much hope in the plan proposed by Zinke and Alexander. I suppose their party has long been driven by the largest corporate funders (Exxon, the Kochs, etc,) who have managed to invest their workers in their cause -- It does look like this influence is waning, though. That Could be one of the reasons. Though most political parties are funded by corporates. My personal belief is that the conservatives have somehow formed a view that there is no such thing as global climate change caused by human actions. They think that just because volcanoes and other natural events cause great amount of pollution, man cannot influence climate with his actions. It also seems that they believe that the renewable sources of energy are in almost abundant supply. All these views perhaps make them owe no responsibility to use natural resources with caution.
|
|
|
Post by rizdek on May 5, 2018 0:04:56 GMT
... but what if there is no thinking involved? :'-} Zinke and Lamar Alexander's Big Plan? We Must Kill the Planet to Save the National ParksNew joint op-ed touts legislation that would fund national parks' infrastructure repairs with leases for oil and gas drilling by Andrea Germanos, staff writer Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke joined with U.S. Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) to argue that the best way to fix the national parks is by pillaging public lands for fossil fuels. Their CNN op-ed published Wednesday focuses on the $11.6 billion repair backlog the parks face—"our parks are being loved to death," they write. They say revenue to address the infrastructure repairs can come through their proposed legislation, the National Park Restoration Act (S.2509). Lamar is the sponsor of the bipartisan legislation, which he introduced at the behest of Zinke, and as the Interior Department noted in a press release, it "follows the blueprint laid out in Secretary Zinke and President Trump's budget proposal, the Public Lands Infrastructure Fund." As Zinke and Lamar, lay out: These revenues will come from energy leases on all onshore and offshore sources of energy production on federal land: oil, gas, coal, renewables, and alternative energy. The fund would receive 50 percent of onshore and offshore revenues from energy production on federal lands over expected amounts that are not already allocated to other purposes. Environmental groups have long cautioned against fueling the climate crisis with fossil fuel extraction on public lands—producton Zinke is pushing to make easier. Read the rest here. I have never understood conservatives fascination with promoting oil, gas and other such industries that are based on non-renewable sources of energy. In Australia, the big 3 energy companies literally destroyed the wind energy industry during the time of Tony Abbot. I frankly don't see much hope in the plan proposed by Zinke and Alexander. Evangelicals are concerned Jesus will come back and we won't have used up the resources he gave us.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 5, 2018 13:48:23 GMT
I suppose their party has long been driven by the largest corporate funders (Exxon, the Kochs, etc,) who have managed to invest their workers in their cause -- It does look like this influence is waning, though. That Could be one of the reasons. Though most political parties are funded by corporates. My personal belief is that the conservatives have somehow formed a view that there is no such thing as global climate change caused by human actions. They think that just because volcanoes and other natural events cause great amount of pollution, man cannot influence climate with his actions. It also seems that they believe that the renewable sources of energy are in almost abundant supply. All these views perhaps make them owe no responsibility to use natural resources with caution. True about corporations, although the Democrats have had to at least pay lip service to various restraints on these organizations, while think-tanks and propaganda funded by businesses such as Koch Industries, which are more dependent on taking resources from the earth*, find ways to depict interference with their founders as an injustice. The Koch organizations, such as the “libertarian” Cato Institute, broaden this indignation to interference in any money-making enterprise. There’s a long history of this kind of propaganda, a history I would have to tell in parts to do it justice. A good book on its origins is The Road from Mont Pelerin. (Some of this propaganda, however, had been around since the slave trade inspired 18th-Century economic thinkers on the true meaning of “freedom.”) The rise of socialism after WWI led a group of academics to join forces in Vienna in Privatseminars to oppose it, re-packaging “laissez-faire” economics in a wide variety of ways, all under the banner of “neoliberalism.” The United States, still very influenced by social Darwinism and Christian puritanism, needed much less repackaging than other countries, so proponents there adopted the word “neoconservatism.” These views became dominant after Ronald Reagan took office, and hegemonic after the collapse of the Soviet Union. My next post will discuss the role of Christian fundamentalism in this history. *8/22/20 FN: Republicans (Such as former VP Cheney) are the traditional party of these industries, as a great scene in the 2018 film Vice shows. I can't find it on-line, but at 1:17:22 we are told that, per "FACA," an appropriate government employee must be present at meetings with these industries' representatives. A call is made to Doug, the receptionist at the department of energy, who has been working there for 3 months. When he arrives, they tell him to "just sit there and be quiet." When energy CEO's arrive and discuss Iraq, we briefly see Doug sitting just outside the room listening to what appears to be an ipod. There seems to be a break in this tradition, though, as a recent Common Dreams article shows.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 6, 2018 13:44:05 GMT
I have written in a few other posts about the religious quality of free market fundamentalism. I want to cover the development of this quality into the modern era. This article reviews a book about a key player in this history -- James McGill Buchan: Educated at the Mont Pelerin-controlled Chicago School of Economics, he appears “like a libertarian Zelig — at each critical juncture in this history.” He also embodies market ideology’s most distasteful aspect – it’s dependence on “extreme inequality and fundamentally ‘antidemocratic and racist strategies of rule.’” The religion-fueled belief in the supremacy of the white “race” continued to mobilize neoliberals. In the US, attempts to deny “segregation academies” tax exemption outraged religious conservatives, and Paul Weyrich, co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, worked with evangelical leader Jerry Falwell to organize the faithful ( using the Roe v. Wade decision to deflect accusations of racism,) giving birth to the “religious right.” This force continues to stir up its followers -- and distract from real dangers such as growing inequality and climate change -- with issues such as gay marriage to this day. More to come.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 8, 2018 16:26:27 GMT
I have written in a few other posts about the religious quality of free market fundamentalism. I want to cover the development of this quality into the modern era. This article reviews a book about a key player in this history -- James McGill Buchan: Educated at the Mont Pelerin-controlled Chicago School of Economics, he appears “like a libertarian Zelig — at each critical juncture in this history.” He also embodies market ideology’s most distasteful aspect – it’s dependence on “extreme inequality and fundamentally ‘antidemocratic and racist strategies of rule.’” The religion-fueled belief in the supremacy of the white “race” continued to mobilize neoliberals. In the US, attempts to deny “segregation academies” tax exemption outraged religious conservatives, and Paul Weyrich, co-founder of the Heritage Foundation, worked with evangelical leader Jerry Falwell to organize the faithful ( using the Roe v. Wade decision to deflect accusations of racism,) giving birth to the “religious right.” This force continues to stir up its followers -- and distract from real dangers such as growing inequality and climate change -- with issues such as gay marriage to this day. More to come. From Reagan’s presidency until today the Christian Right has controlled the Republican Party. In foreign policy, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the faithful decided that the Bible demands that Israel control the Middle East and the US dominate the world. At home, as this article shows, they are also heavily influenced by Dominion Theology, calling for the “unfettered pursuit of profit” while engaged in “spiritual warfare” in what Pentacostal minister C. Peter Wagner calls “‘the Seven Mountains’ of modern society – family, religion, arts/entertainment, the media, education, business, and government.” Meanwhile, the supposedly rebellious Libertarians promote a slightly repackaged version of the same doctrine – Mises Institute contributor and Ron Paul aid Gary North is himself an extremely influential Dominionist. I’ll finish this history in my next post.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2018 13:20:47 GMT
In the Democratic party, identity politics removed cultural and political factors from economics, leaving “the economy” to the neoliberal “experts” while offering “multiculturalism” to give the illusion of equality among various groups. Thus, Bill Clinton’s presidency saw the end of “welfare as we know it,” the NAFTA treaty and many other injustices, especially against African Americans, as this article shows -- Such injustice includes “the largest increase in federal and state prison inmates of any president in American history,” which population, due to Clinton’s support for the “100-1 sentencing disparity for crack versus cocaine,” was overwhelmingly African American. The illusion of equality was made possible by the market’s weakening of the institutions that have traditionally guided spirituality, popular culture moving us increasingly toward subjective morality. This popular culture, now largely in the form of social media, continues to feed this illusion as it increasingly isolates us. 9/22/20 FN: I added an entry to an old blog of mine, an entry that fits well with what I have said in this post. This video might put across one of its concepts most succinctly:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2018 14:46:47 GMT
Getting back to the environment, there are signs that people are seeing through all these obfuscations – Here’s an article about the global movement agroecology – Such news brings me hope for our “ pale blue dot.”
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 10, 2018 11:01:52 GMT
Getting back to the environment, there are signs that people are seeing through all these obfuscations – Here’s an article about the global movement agroecology – Such news brings me hope for our “ pale blue dot.” I believe everything has a limit. Nature can only take up to a limit. Unusual weather patterns have already surfaced in a few parts of world and sooner than later the things will get lot more tougher. A lot will depend upon China and USA. These two countries are leaders of our world and they need to step up in combating these issues. I am afraid up until now they have not done as much as they could do regarding environment and sustainable development.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jun 4, 2018 1:23:06 GMT
Getting back to the environment, there are signs that people are seeing through all these obfuscations – Here’s an article about the global movement agroecology – Such news brings me hope for our “ pale blue dot.” I just saw a climate change discussion on soapbox board and can't help feeling stupefied at what I read. One guy (a republican) was so foolish as to post a satire article about Global Climate change while thinking that he made a point. These people do not even understand the things they read! I have often seen Global Climate Change deniers say things like "last three years I have experienced more harsher winters than before so global climate change isn't real." Or that they are not feeling hot enough for there to be any actual global warming. I think one of the reasons why people do not understand the implications of average global temperature rise is that people are not well read in concepts of statistics like mean, median, sd. Worse is that temperature is measured along interval scale which has has no true zero point and thus any ratio is meaningless. 20 degree is not 2 times as hot as 10 degree. But given the fact that deniers are not even able to pick sarcasm and satire in articles written just for exposing their stupidity I have hard time believing that teaching them statistics (even elementary stats) is possible. Once again I call for better education system as only way to deal with these and other problems.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 11:08:50 GMT
Getting back to the environment, there are signs that people are seeing through all these obfuscations – Here’s an article about the global movement agroecology – Such news brings me hope for our “ pale blue dot.” I just saw a climate change discussion on soapbox board and can't help feeling stupefied at what I read. One guy (a republican) was so foolish as to post a satire article about Global Climate change while thinking that he made a point. These people do not even understand the things they read! I have often seen Global Climate Change deniers say things like "last three years I have experienced more harsher winters than before so global climate change isn't real." Or that they are not feeling hot enough for there to be any actual global warming. I think one of the reasons why people do not understand the implications of average global temperature rise is that people are not well read in concepts of statistics like mean, median, sd. Worse is that temperature is measured along interval scale which has has no true zero point and thus any ratio is meaningless. 20 degree is not 2 times as hot as 10 degree. But given the fact that deniers are not even able to pick sarcasm and satire in articles written just for exposing their stupidity I have hard time believing that teaching them statistics (even elementary stats) is possible. Once again I call for better education system as only way to deal with these and other problems. Agree about the need for better education. Of course, George Carlin (despite his harsh way of putting it) is spot on here:
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 14:11:36 GMT
I have never understood conservatives fascination with promoting oil, gas and other such industries that are based on non-renewable sources of energy. It's pretty simple, "I can have easy money here and now, God'll take care of the rest and I'm going to heaven... fuck it!"
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 15:16:53 GMT
I have never understood conservatives fascination with promoting oil, gas and other such industries that are based on non-renewable sources of energy. It's pretty simple, "I can have easy money here and now, God'll take care of the rest and I'm going to heaven... fuck it!" I understand the frustration with conservatives, but, as noted above, there's plenty of blame to go around.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 15:22:09 GMT
It's pretty simple, "I can have easy money here and now, God'll take care of the rest and I'm going to heaven... fuck it!" I understand the frustration with conservatives, but, as noted above, there's plenty of blame to go around. I thought we were talking about fossil fuels and alternative renewable energy sources... ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 4, 2018 15:59:34 GMT
I thought we were talking about fossil fuels and alternative renewable energy sources... ? Sorry for the confusion - these threads tend to evolve...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2018 21:28:13 GMT
I just found an interesting paper connecting the Spanish scholastics with the Austrian School of Economics – I thought I’d put it here for future reference.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 10, 2018 23:41:19 GMT
Thanks for polluting the planet, bastards!
|
|