Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 14:54:07 GMT
Enjoy! The X-Men timeline was altered 2 times, not just one (DOFP). FIRST CLASS was already a "divergence". Everything is explained here: THE X-MEN CINEMATIC TIMELINESx-continuity.blogspot.com
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 18:30:20 GMT
First Class was supposed to be a soft reboot if memory serves, but then they decided to include the time travel stuff later.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 9, 2017 21:38:49 GMT
First Class was supposed to be a soft reboot if memory serves, but then they decided to include the time travel stuff later. Correct, sir.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2017 3:41:45 GMT
Deadpool 2 is also going to have time-travel, and it's also possible that we will see time-travel in future Legion episodes. So yeah, there is no point to try to make sense out of the X-Men timelines.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 10, 2017 20:01:18 GMT
Deadpool 2 is also going to have time-travel, and it's also possible that we will see time-travel in future Legion episodes. So yeah, there is no point to try to make sense out of the X-Men timelines. There will be more and more iterations of the timeline, indeed. 4th and 5th.
|
|
|
Post by becauseiambatmanoffg on Feb 12, 2017 4:32:35 GMT
Making sense of the X-Men timelines is like proving 1+1=3
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 12, 2017 23:52:30 GMT
Making sense of the X-Men timelines is like proving 1+1=3 I made it.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Feb 13, 2017 5:22:57 GMT
the correct answer is.............................treat them like loosely connected stand alone films.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 14:25:11 GMT
the correct answer is.............................treat them like loosely connected stand alone films. I think you can treat them as loosely connected trilogies (specifically the original trilogy and the First Class trilogy). The continuity within those respective trilogies is actually fairly solid. It's just when you try to make those two trilogy connect together that you get a bunch of continuity errors.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 14:37:37 GMT
the correct answer is.............................treat them like loosely connected stand alone films. I think you can treat them as loosely connected trilogies (specifically the original trilogy and the First Class trilogy). The continuity within those respective trilogies is actually fairly solid. It's just when you try to make those two trilogy connect together that you get a bunch of continuity errors. Except for the aging and ending of X-Men: Days of Future Past. They totally ignored that ending in X-Men: Apocalypse.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 15:26:46 GMT
I think you can treat them as loosely connected trilogies (specifically the original trilogy and the First Class trilogy). The continuity within those respective trilogies is actually fairly solid. It's just when you try to make those two trilogy connect together that you get a bunch of continuity errors. Except for the aging and ending of X-Men: Days of Future Past. They totally ignored that ending in X-Men: Apocalypse. I would disagree. I've just always assumed that mutants age a little slower than humans (some more than others, like Wolverine and Mystique). If mutants truly are the next stage in human evolution, then it stands to reason that they'd have longer lifespans. After all, humans today live longer than humans from centuries before. It's just one of those things.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Feb 13, 2017 19:01:26 GMT
I think you can treat them as loosely connected trilogies (specifically the original trilogy and the First Class trilogy). The continuity within those respective trilogies is actually fairly solid. It's just when you try to make those two trilogy connect together that you get a bunch of continuity errors. Except for the aging and ending of X-Men: Days of Future Past. They totally ignored that ending in X-Men: Apocalypse. I know right? I was wondering what would happen with Mystique posing as Stryker with Logan's body.........but, nothing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 19:32:45 GMT
Except for the aging and ending of X-Men: Days of Future Past. They totally ignored that ending in X-Men: Apocalypse. I would disagree. I've just always assumed that mutants age a little slower than humans (some more than others, like Wolverine and Mystique). If mutants truly are the next stage in human evolution, then it stands to reason that they'd have longer lifespans. After all, humans today live longer than humans from centuries before. It's just one of those things. Moira MacTaggert is a mutant?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 20:35:27 GMT
I would disagree. I've just always assumed that mutants age a little slower than humans (some more than others, like Wolverine and Mystique). If mutants truly are the next stage in human evolution, then it stands to reason that they'd have longer lifespans. After all, humans today live longer than humans from centuries before. It's just one of those things. Moira MacTaggert is a mutant? Yes. And her power is to stay beautiful forever.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 20:38:13 GMT
Moira MacTaggert is a mutant? Yes. And her power is to stay beautiful forever. Well, that explains why her son is a mutant as well, lol!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 17, 2017 11:31:48 GMT
How old was Moira in First Class anyway?
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Feb 19, 2017 22:11:30 GMT
Except for the aging and ending of X-Men: Days of Future Past. They totally ignored that ending in X-Men: Apocalypse. I know right? I was wondering what would happen with Mystique posing as Stryker with Logan's body.........but, nothing. She saved him from drowning. She was going around saving Mutants through out the film. There was never meant to be a mystery.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 20, 2017 13:13:46 GMT
I know right? I was wondering what would happen with Mystique posing as Stryker with Logan's body.........but, nothing. She saved him from drowning. She was going around saving Mutants through out the film. There was never meant to be a mystery. Yeah, indeed. She saved Logan. Logan lived his life for 10 years. He was "captured" by Stryker (the real one) some months before the events of Apocalypse.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Feb 20, 2017 13:28:55 GMT
She saved him from drowning. She was going around saving Mutants through out the film. There was never meant to be a mystery. Yeah, indeed. She saved Logan. Logan lived his life for 10 years. He was "captured" by Stryker (the real one) some months before the events of Apocalypse. LOGAN implies he volunteered again with presence of the dog tags.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 22, 2017 1:04:55 GMT
Yeah, indeed. She saved Logan. Logan lived his life for 10 years. He was "captured" by Stryker (the real one) some months before the events of Apocalypse. LOGAN implies he volunteered he volunteered again with presence of the dog tags. Nice observation. It could be. But he didn't wear any dogtag in the Apocalypse's "Weapon X" sequence, if memory serves me well.
|
|