|
Post by sjg on Mar 15, 2017 20:17:43 GMT
I've seen plenty of films about the second world war but hardly any about the first and i was wondering whether that is the same for anyone else.
It looks to me like more films have been made about the second than the first which i think is odd because there must be just as many compelling tales to tell from the first world war.
I'm off to see what WWI films there are out there
|
|
|
|
Post by sjg on Mar 16, 2017 10:34:03 GMT
Thanks paislene, i've had a look and you're right there are quite a few WWI films out there, definitely more than i thought. I've found a few lists of both WWII and WWI films on Wikipeida and IMDB i'll have a look through
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 17, 2017 1:02:45 GMT
There were a decent number made in the 1920s and 1930s such as All Quiet on the Western Front, Hell's Angels, The Dawn Patrol, Wings, and The Lost Patrol. But once WW2 hit the fan, you saw an explosion in films produced and set in the ongoing conflict. The wiki category page for such releases is north of 300. I guess it's harder to make a traditional Hollywood movie about WW1 because the cause and conflicts that arose from it are more complicated than the black-and-white case with WW2 being "beat the Axis of evil" and whatnot. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_films_made_in_wartime
|
|
|
Post by telegonus on Apr 16, 2017 8:36:41 GMT
There were a decent number made in the 1920s and 1930s such as All Quiet on the Western Front, Hell's Angels, The Dawn Patrol, Wings, and The Lost Patrol. But once WW2 hit the fan, you saw an explosion in films produced and set in the ongoing conflict. The wiki category page for such releases is north of 300. I guess it's harder to make a traditional Hollywood movie about WW1 because the cause and conflicts that arose from it are more complicated than the black-and-white case with WW2 being "beat the Axis of evil" and whatnot. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:World_War_II_films_made_in_wartimeRight. The first war was, among other things, the swan song of the old Europe. The topic is way too big for me to want to go into a great detail about at this late hour but in many respects it represented, indeed symbolized, a kind of evolution of the modern world that one can actually discuss,--and many do--without having to go into the issue of battles, which side did what to the other in a particular military engagement. The second war was, as you stated, just about black and white as to the eternal question "which side are you on?". The Axis powers did in their fashion represent at least a potential evolutionary change,--but it could never have happened. Nor was there any room for compromise so far as the Allie were concerned: the governments, the political regimes, of Germany and Japan had to be wholly obliterated. Also, to bring this back to films, the changes in the way movies were made between 1918 and 1939 were vast, with the addition of sound adding greatly to the feeling of realism in film. I find that First World War movies, especially but not exclusively those made before 1940, tend to nearly always feel somehow wistful about the era they're depicting, while World War Two films, those dealing with combat, the ones that emphasize action, whether on land, at sea or in the air, came to constitute, broadly speaking, a genre unto itself, and one that remained popular for decades after the war, like westerns or swashbucklers.
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Apr 16, 2017 14:45:06 GMT
Fraulein Doktor w/Suzy Kendall (excellent film)
there's also a compelling documentary entitled The Guns of August
|
|
|
Post by telegonus on Apr 16, 2017 16:46:15 GMT
Yes, The Guns Of August was big as a film and as a book.
The first war, and various aspects of it and its aftermath, also turned up in movies of all kinds, from Jules et Jim to Nicholas & Alexandra.
|
|
medjay
Sophomore
@medjay
Posts: 668
Likes: 70
|
Post by medjay on Apr 26, 2017 20:45:26 GMT
I've seen plenty of films about the second world war but hardly any about the first and i was wondering whether that is the same for anyone else. It looks to me like more films have been made about the second than the first which i think is odd because there must be just as many compelling tales to tell from the first world war. I'm off to see what WWI films there are out there www.imdb.com/title/tt0115822/?ref_=nv_sr_1www.imdb.com/title/tt0424205/?ref_=nv_sr_1
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on May 26, 2017 18:42:01 GMT
Gallipoli is pretty good although there really isn't much to the actual battle.
A modern film about the campaign against the Ottoman Empire would be stupendous. The Mesopotamian campaign was full of blunders by leadership and led to the capture of an entire British force. The Siege of Kut was a travesty.
Of course, don't forget about Lawrence of Arabia.
The Lighthorsemen is another good film about the war against the Ottomans.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Jun 9, 2017 12:56:04 GMT
There was a tv movie called The Lost Battalion (2001) that was actually quite good.
|
|
|
Post by koskiewicz on Sept 16, 2017 16:54:39 GMT
I wish film studios would re-master the Yugoslavian film "Fraulein Doktor" (w/Suzy Kendall - 1968) or remake the damn thing already...
It is an outstanding WWI film with grim scenes of trench warfare...
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Dec 2, 2017 17:23:04 GMT
|
|