|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Mar 16, 2017 1:05:21 GMT
lol
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 16, 2017 1:17:08 GMT
No, they'll say it doesn't count because it's a tv series and that DC shows are better rated than Marvel or something stupid. Can't we all just get along?
|
|
|
Post by LeWildPlatypus on Mar 16, 2017 1:20:07 GMT
Nope, it was done to shake off all the conspiracy theorists out there. They made an inferior product on purpose, obviously. *cue X-Files intro*
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 16, 2017 1:55:00 GMT
it PROVES they paid 3 critics.
jk
but why are they allowing critics to rate the series if it's not completely available? were they that certain of the quality?
now i'm pretty sure they can change their stance if the last half improves, but still, it would be like showing the first 30 minutes of a film then asking critics to begin writing and publishing full reviews.
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Mar 16, 2017 1:58:00 GMT
it PROVES they paid 3 critics. jk but why are they allowing critics to rate the series if it's not completely available? were they that certain of the quality? now i'm pretty sure they can change their stance if the last half improves, but still, it would be like showing the first 30 minutes of a film then asking critics to begin writing and publishing full reviews. That's what kinda happened with Logan.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 16, 2017 1:59:50 GMT
it PROVES they paid 3 critics. jk but why are they allowing critics to rate the series if it's not completely available? were they that certain of the quality? now i'm pretty sure they can change their stance if the last half improves, but still, it would be like showing the first 30 minutes of a film then asking critics to begin writing and publishing full reviews. That's what kinda happened with Logan. full reviews or buzz?
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 16, 2017 5:24:51 GMT
I'm actually not sure the reviews are all that bad.
They basically say it's a bit uneventful.
That's a hell of a lot different than saying it's sloppy nonsensical writing and terrible acting.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Mar 17, 2017 0:12:35 GMT
it PROVES they paid 3 critics. jk but why are they allowing critics to rate the series if it's not completely available? were they that certain of the quality? now i'm pretty sure they can change their stance if the last half improves, but still, it would be like showing the first 30 minutes of a film then asking critics to begin writing and publishing full reviews. I think they did that with all the series. Luke Cage kinda got a hit for changing after what was shown early.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 17, 2017 0:31:05 GMT
I'm actually not sure the reviews are all that bad.
They basically say it's a bit uneventful.
That's a hell of a lot different than saying it's sloppy nonsensical writing and terrible acting. well the current average is 4.6/10, so that's not a great number. now that may change once the second half is released, but so far it seems like it's dull af, or at least the first 6 hours.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 17, 2017 1:59:00 GMT
I'm actually not sure the reviews are all that bad.
They basically say it's a bit uneventful.
That's a hell of a lot different than saying it's sloppy nonsensical writing and terrible acting. well the current average is 4.6/10, so that's not a great number. now that may change once the second half is released, but so far it seems like it's dull af, or at least the first 6 hours. I'm not as concerned about the number so much as what the reviews say. If the only complaint is that not much happens in the first half, but that the acting and story are competent, then that's better than the acting and story sucking, even if there is a lot of action.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 17, 2017 2:48:00 GMT
well the current average is 4.6/10, so that's not a great number. now that may change once the second half is released, but so far it seems like it's dull af, or at least the first 6 hours. I'm not as concerned about the number so much as what the reviews say. If the only complaint is that not much happens in the first half, but that the acting and story are competent, then that's better than the acting and story sucking, even if there is a lot of action. again it's probably not "bad" just boring, like Transcendence, not offensive or anything since you could follow along and the acting was fine, but you just couldn't care less. and again, it's just the first 6 for now, so i'm and we're just speculating.
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 17, 2017 2:59:40 GMT
again it's probably not "bad" just boring, like Transcendence, not offensive or anything since you could follow along and the acting was fine, but you just couldn't care less. and again, it's just the first 6 for now, so i'm and we're just speculating. True, and I'm kind of happy to know it. Hopefully the last 6 are solid, and it'll be fine.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 17, 2017 3:12:08 GMT
granted i'll probably never watch it since I don't have Netflix......
peace y'all, i'm out
|
|