|
Post by HorrorMetal on May 15, 2018 22:01:51 GMT
It's not as good as the 1933 original or the 2005 version, but I always liked it.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on May 15, 2018 22:04:08 GMT
I love it.
It was a big part of the reason I couldn't "rank" the films.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2018 2:31:36 GMT
One reason is because there was only just the one fight with a giant snake and nothing else. No dinosaurs, no giant spiders or any other giant creatures.
The other reason is likely Jessica Lange acting but other wise I see no problems with it! Of course I'm sure it was her 1st film so I'm willing to cut her some slack on that one.
|
|
|
Post by HorrorMetal on May 16, 2018 2:42:30 GMT
One reason is because there was only just the one fight with a giant snake and nothing else. No dinosaurs, no giant spiders or any other giant creatures. The other reason is likely Jessica Lange acting but other wise I see no problems with it! Of course I'm sure it was her 1st film so I'm willing to cut her some slack on that one. Yeah I can definitely understand that. Not having dinosaurs was a huge downside for sure. The only other monster besides Kong and the giant snake was Jeff Bridges' beard. Also, it didn't seem like it fully respected the 1933 film in a lot of ways too. At least not as much as the 2005 version does.
|
|