|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 16, 2017 18:50:18 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 16, 2017 20:07:08 GMT
If not the Red Skull maybe he means the Skrulls instead, actually it be interesting if it was both. The Red Skull with a large Skrull army.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 16, 2017 20:57:28 GMT
If not the Red Skull maybe he means the Skrulls instead, actually it be interesting if it was both. The Red Skull with a large Skrull army. If they revive him after all, I want him to bring more to the table than another alien invasion. |
|
flasuss
Sophomore
@flasuss
Posts: 323
Likes: 147
 
|
Post by flasuss on Mar 17, 2017 1:37:48 GMT
If not the Red Skull maybe he means the Skrulls instead, actually it be interesting if it was both. The Red Skull with a large Skrull army. Fox has the rights to the Skrulls. |
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 17, 2017 1:38:51 GMT
If not the Red Skull maybe he means the Skrulls instead, actually it be interesting if it was both. The Red Skull with a large Skrull army. Fox has the rights to the Skrulls. I thought the Skrulls were shared. |
|
flasuss
Sophomore
@flasuss
Posts: 323
Likes: 147
|
Post by flasuss on Mar 17, 2017 1:42:20 GMT
Fox has the rights to the Skrulls. I thought the Skrulls were shared. Really? They might be, which would be strange (of all the characters to share!). |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 17, 2017 1:42:28 GMT
If not the Red Skull maybe he means the Skrulls instead, actually it be interesting if it was both. The Red Skull with a large Skrull army. Fox has the rights to the Skrulls. Fox only has the rights to the super skrull but they both own the rights to the skrulls. |
|
|
|
Post by ArArArchStanton on Mar 17, 2017 5:07:50 GMT
My experience with this kind of thing is it's not worth getting carried away with. Even if he did mean the Red Skull, there's no guarantee they'll continue with it. |
|
