|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Apr 4, 2017 6:19:53 GMT
Ha ha ha ha. They couldn't get away with the wage gap if they were overt about it. But yes, it does exist. That's my favorite part. Since when does that make something impossible? Ha ha, this sjw clown is always arguing the idiotic garbage he's been spoon fed to repeat from his liberal puppet masters.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Apr 4, 2017 10:43:07 GMT
Ha ha ha ha. They couldn't get away with the wage gap if they were overt about it. But yes, it does exist. That's my favorite part. Since when does that make something impossible? Ha ha, this sjw clown is always arguing the idiotic garbage he's been spoon fed to repeat from his liberal puppet masters. Facts are inconvenient things for knuckle dragging Neanderthals like you, aren't they?
|
|
|
Post by Tunaman09 on Apr 4, 2017 14:24:51 GMT
Ha ha ha ha. They couldn't get away with the wage gap if they were overt about it. But yes, it does exist. That's my favorite part. Since when does that make something impossible? Ha ha, this sjw clown is always arguing the idiotic garbage he's been spoon fed to repeat from his liberal puppet masters. These loonies actually think companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis, they think companies like throwing away money for no other reason than to keep up social constructs.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Apr 4, 2017 16:44:25 GMT
These loonies actually think companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis, they think companies like throwing away money for no other reason than to keep up social constructs. If you want to see an ignorant lunatic, just take a good look in a mirror. You were supplied multiple sources from serious academic, scientifically controlled sources which proved that there is an earnings gap, and like a young earth creationist, you just ignored it since it doesn't support your idiotic fantasies about how reality works. For most of history in the West, women were considered little more that property, and in much of the West have only been able to vote for just a few generations. The biases against them didn't just vanish magically, manure for brains.
|
|
|
Post by Harry Skywalker on Apr 4, 2017 18:01:03 GMT
There's still inequality between women and men, that's for sure. However, women have many advantages as well and fortunately the wage gap has been decreasing and decreasing.
But current Feminism is absolutely pathetic and laughable. It's not even Feminism anymore.
|
|
|
Post by Tunaman09 on Apr 4, 2017 23:22:13 GMT
These loonies actually think companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis, they think companies like throwing away money for no other reason than to keep up social constructs. If you want to see an ignorant lunatic, just take a good look in a mirror. You were supplied multiple sources from serious academic, scientifically controlled sources which proved that there is an earnings gap, and like a young earth creationist, you just ignored it since it doesn't support your idiotic fantasies about how reality works. For moist of history in the West, women were considered little more that property, and in much of the West have only been able to vote for just a few generations. The biases against them didn't just vanish magically, manure for brains. So you genuinely believe companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis? Also most men that have ever lived in the west (or anywhere on Earth for that matter) were considered little more than property for most of history too, if you weren't part of the Aristocracy you had a very hard life, doesn't matter if you're male or female.
|
|
|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Apr 5, 2017 2:08:21 GMT
Ha ha, this sjw clown is always arguing the idiotic garbage he's been spoon fed to repeat from his liberal puppet masters. Facts are inconvenient things for knuckle dragging Neanderthals like you, aren't they? lol "facts"! XD
|
|
|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Apr 5, 2017 2:10:54 GMT
Ha ha, this sjw clown is always arguing the idiotic garbage he's been spoon fed to repeat from his liberal puppet masters. These loonies actually think companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis, they think companies like throwing away money for no other reason than to keep up social constructs. I know right? They also think there are 20 genders.
|
|
|
Post by Tunaman09 on Apr 5, 2017 9:49:13 GMT
These loonies actually think companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis, they think companies like throwing away money for no other reason than to keep up social constructs. I know right? They also think there are 20 genders. Ahh the ever growing number of genders thing, I think the little message under my Avatar suits the situation quite nicely.
Great delivery by Steve Martin.
|
|
|
Post by woozlewuzzle on Apr 5, 2017 11:18:38 GMT
I know right? They also think there are 20 genders. Ahh the ever growing number of genders thing, I think the little message under my Avatar suits the situation quite nicely.
Great delivery by Steve Martin. Heh heh.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Apr 5, 2017 13:49:52 GMT
Isn't this a spin-off? I don't see a problem with it. As long as the game is good, who gives a shit! I think it's good that naughty dog retired Drake, let the man have a break.
Besides I would rather have Naughty Dog make a new Jak and Dexter game!
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Apr 5, 2017 16:55:30 GMT
So you genuinely believe companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis? Also most men that have ever lived in the west (or anywhere on Earth for that matter) were considered little more than property for most of history too, if you weren't part of the Aristocracy you had a very hard life, doesn't matter if you're male or female. Systematic bias against women has been conclusively demonstrate time and time again. Women even do it to themselves and each other. Rarely is it ever consciously thought of by anyone, and it shows up in the strangest ways. For instance, there are more deaths and injuries during hurricanes when they are given female names, even when compared to storms of equal strength assigned male names. Why? Because subconsciously people don't take them as serious threats and don't flee or take shelter to the same degree they do when the storms have male names. Nobody says to themselves, "This storm is only called Lisa, so I don't need to leave town or shutter up my windows", just as (almost no one) says to themselves, "Well, this employee of mine is female, so I'll try and get away with giving her a smaller raise than everyone else who is a guy". That isn't how human psychology works, and these basic facts shouldn't be things someone should need to explain to you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2017 17:46:54 GMT
Oh, so it's not the uncharted movie? Shit. I thought it was the movie.
Good to see THAT will have Nathan Drake.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 5, 2017 21:05:18 GMT
Ha ha, this sjw clown is always arguing the idiotic garbage he's been spoon fed to repeat from his liberal puppet masters. These loonies actually think companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis, they think companies like throwing away money for no other reason than to keep up social constructs. Tuna, you've already been proven wrong. Several times over. With actual studies. Not tweets.
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Apr 5, 2017 21:08:00 GMT
If you want to see an ignorant lunatic, just take a good look in a mirror. You were supplied multiple sources from serious academic, scientifically controlled sources which proved that there is an earnings gap, and like a young earth creationist, you just ignored it since it doesn't support your idiotic fantasies about how reality works. For moist of history in the West, women were considered little more that property, and in much of the West have only been able to vote for just a few generations. The biases against them didn't just vanish magically, manure for brains. So you genuinely believe companies like to pay men more just because they are men and have a penis? Also most men that have ever lived in the west (or anywhere on Earth for that matter) were considered little more than property for most of history too, if you weren't part of the Aristocracy you had a very hard life, doesn't matter if you're male or female. Incorrect. Slaves were property. But the average man wasn't. His wife and daughter, though, they were his property. Whether he was rich or not. So even when they weren't part of the Aristocracy, women had it worse. And again, just because you don't believe something is happening, doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Like evolution deniers.
|
|