|
Post by Nostalgias4Geeks🌈 on May 18, 2017 9:41:06 GMT
So if P isn't a sexuality and T isn't a sexuality, why should they be lumped in with LGB which ARE sexualities? This is your argument, masked by your ludicrous notion that because P relies on sexual attraction, it therefore has more in common with LGBH, which are sexualities and rely on sexual attraction. Therefore, you are only arguing now for T not belonging in the confounded alphabet soup of LGBHTQI......etc, or is that just a sidestep to try and veil your bigotry? The Q and I are not sexualities either. neither P or T should be in the "alphabet soup of LGBHTQI......etc"...and never said either should be what i have said is... P has more in common with LGB than T because P like LGB is dependent on sexual attraction. if you paid attention to the posts in this thread instead of playing victim you would have seen this.. im not proposing anything...have you read all my posts in this thread or were you so busy trying rush to toasteds aid you skipped that step? P has more in common with LGB than T because T has nothing to do with sexual attraction. i never said P should be added and dont even think T should be in there..Lol now you're just trolling.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on May 18, 2017 11:44:49 GMT
L is dependent on sexual attraction. G is dependent on sexual attraction. B is dependent on sexual attraction. T has nothing to do with sexual attraction. P is dependent on sexual attraction. That's true. What you're ignoring is that "LGBTQetc." is not about sexual attraction.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on May 18, 2017 12:12:32 GMT
For all that it has to do with why L, B, G and T are grouped together, you might as well say that P doesn't fit because the word doesn't contain the letter "a."
|
|
|
Post by Cooper, the Golden Retriever on May 19, 2017 15:03:27 GMT
best way to show you dont care is to not respond...try that? toasted was the one that responded to my month old post so apparently someone cares. That's fine, but isn't it kind of rude to group gays with pedophiles when there's literally no more similarity than heterosexuality? I THINK you MEANT HOMOSEXUALITY. BTW Many pedophiles are HETEROSEXUAL while we're on that kick. EDIT: On the other hand, I see Nostalgia that we agree and that I misintetrept.THanks for making the point for me.
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on May 19, 2017 15:13:10 GMT
Why do a lot of people on the these boards do that OCD thing where they keep repeating something over and over?
|
|
|
Post by Cooper, the Golden Retriever on May 22, 2017 21:44:13 GMT
I THINK you MEANT HOMOSEXUALITY. BTW Many pedophiles are HETEROSEXUAL while we're on that kick.That is what Nostalgia said though, you have just parroted her response by contradicting it. Thank you. I misunderstood her comment.Sorry.
|
|
doivid
New Member
@doivid
Posts: 33
Likes: 5
|
Post by doivid on May 26, 2017 11:06:44 GMT
>it's the "let's pretend we don't know what informed consent is" episode
|
|
|
Post by morfeus on Jun 5, 2017 11:55:28 GMT
Is NAMBLA back into play?
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Aug 2, 2017 19:55:54 GMT
Or should they be given their own message board section? Discuss: The only thing pedophiles should be added to is jail. Prison. And you're not funny. There's no correlation between pedophilia and being gay or trans. You however seem to be full on ignorant though.
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Oct 31, 2017 2:57:46 GMT
should it be normal?
|
|
|
Post by MooseNugget on Nov 5, 2017 4:01:42 GMT
Or should they be given their own message board section? Discuss: I'd legit ban you from my board for making this joke.
|
|
|
Post by General Kenobi on Nov 15, 2017 12:42:33 GMT
What is with conservatives obsession with pedophilia? They want to make consenting adults of the same sex illegal but they want to legalize adults forcing themselves on children. Shows you what kind of diseased minds they have.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Dec 13, 2017 23:27:11 GMT
Or should they be given their own message board section? Discuss: I'd legit ban you from my board for making this joke. And I’d come back with an army of sock accounts. This is not how you beat an idea.
|
|
|
Post by MooseNugget on Dec 14, 2017 9:24:41 GMT
I'd legit ban you from my board for making this joke. And I’d come back with an army of sock accounts. This is not how you beat an idea. Yeah that's legit sad you'd consider doing that.
|
|
|
Post by HorrorMetal on Jun 11, 2018 20:33:49 GMT
Absolutely not!
|
|