Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 0:29:24 GMT
.
|
|
|
|
Post by Terrapin Station on Aug 19, 2018 0:32:49 GMT
That's a tough one because I don't think she's that great at either.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Aug 19, 2018 18:50:13 GMT
I picked Acting because she won't be "hot" (i.e. young) forever, yet she will always have her talent.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 19, 2018 20:50:20 GMT
Acting
I mean she is attractive but i don`t think she is hot.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 19, 2018 23:50:12 GMT
Acting. She's certainly pretty. Yet really, I was never drawn to her like her contemporaries like Emma Stone or Anne Hathaway.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Aug 20, 2018 7:42:18 GMT
Acting. She's attractive for sure, but I don't have a raging hard-on for her like I do for some other actresses.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Dec 15, 2018 17:20:08 GMT
I picked Acting because she won't be "hot" (i.e. young) forever, yet she will always have her talent. Cool, you can see the future? |
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Dec 15, 2018 21:47:51 GMT
I picked Acting because she won't be "hot" (i.e. young) forever, yet she will always have her talent. Cool, you can see the future? Yes. I'm a time traveler. |
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Dec 15, 2018 22:02:28 GMT
Acting
|
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Dec 15, 2018 22:19:40 GMT
I picked Acting because she won't be "hot" (i.e. young) forever, yet she will always have her talent. Cool, you can see the future? That would hardly be necessary. Acting talent, especially in a born natural, only increases with age. |
|
|
|
Post by James on Dec 15, 2018 22:37:06 GMT
I wanna say both but I guess I’ll go with acting.
|
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Dec 16, 2018 9:33:44 GMT
Cool, you can see the future? That would hardly be necessary. Acting talent, especially in a born natural, only increases with age. No, that is incorrect. Acting talent can definitely decrease in quality with time. And why are you equating hotness with being young? There are many hot older women. Never heard of MILFs? |
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Dec 16, 2018 13:35:14 GMT
No, that is incorrect. Acting talent can definitely decrease in quality with time. Examples?
I made no comment on hotness at all. In fact, I never do as I think focusing on an actress's looks is superficial and sexist.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Dec 22, 2018 17:51:51 GMT
If I could then I would have voted "Both".
|
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Dec 23, 2018 16:25:12 GMT
No, that is incorrect. Acting talent can definitely decrease in quality with time. Examples? Arya from Game of Thrones Jared Leto Charlie Sheen Oops, I got you mixed up with mikef6. My bad. But how is it superficial and sexist to appreciate someone's beauty? That makes no sense. Wouldn't it be sexist to not show appreciation? mikef6 , why are you equating hotness with being young? There are many hot older women. Never heard of MILFs? |
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Dec 23, 2018 16:56:39 GMT
Arya from Game of Thrones Jared Leto Charlie Sheen Arya from Game of Thrones:
Bad choice since she's too young to have ever established a career worth judging. And the writing of a role cannot be underestimated when judging the quality of a performance--actors can only work with what they are given, and if they aren't given much, they can't show their skills.
Jared Leto:
You are simply out of your mind. He just won an Oscar a few years ago in the later part of his career. Are you high?
Charlie Sheen:
Another ridiculous choice since most of the recognition he got as an actor came in the later portion of his career, which is the exact opposite of what you are trying to prove.
In short, I don't think you will ever be able to give an example of an actor everyone agrees has declined in his or her skills over time. Keep in mind, that is a completely separate issue from a career declining. People can make bad career choices.
A person's appearance is one of the least important or interesting things about them. I admire actors for their charisma and choices of projects, not how they look.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Dec 23, 2018 19:03:41 GMT
mikef6 , why are you equating hotness with being young? There are many hot older women. Never heard of MILFs? I didn't and wasn't. That is why I put the word "hot" in quotes. Equating hot with young is the meaning of all these "hot" threads. I was commenting on others' definition of "hot." |
|
|
|
Post by bluerisk on Dec 23, 2018 20:10:19 GMT
Arya from Game of Thrones Jared Leto Charlie Sheen Arya from Game of Thrones:
Bad choice since she's too young to have ever established a career worth judging. And the writing of a role cannot be underestimated when judging the quality of a performance--actors can only work with what they are given, and if they aren't given much, they can't show their skills.
Jared Leto:
You are simply out of your mind. He just won an Oscar a few years ago in the later part of his career. Are you high?
Charlie Sheen:
Another ridiculous choice since most of the recognition he got as an actor came in the later portion of his career, which is the exact opposite of what you are trying to prove.
In short, I don't think you will ever be able to give an example of an actor everyone agrees has declined in his or her skills over time. Keep in mind, that is a completely separate issue from a career declining. People can make bad career choices.
A person's appearance is one of the least important or interesting things about them. I admire actors for their charisma and choices of projects, not how they look.
It can decline, but rather to health reasons, or mental issues. Example: Marlon Brando. But even when he was already in a borderline state, hardly co-operation with the director, hardly caring for what he did, he pulled off a performance like in "Apocalypse Now", but in general his acting declined for he no longer really cared, made bad choices and last but not least his life-style took his toll. Robert de Niro is also an example: poor movie choices with lackluster performances. Does it matter if his skills have declined or not, if he no longer cares to show them off? An athlete who is no longer fully committed to his sport, will decline in his performance no matter how talented, skilled and experienced he is, even if he is by age in his prime. And at some point, if you let go yourself for years, you might have really lost some of your acting skills. But Leto is hardly such a case. |
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Dec 23, 2018 20:13:56 GMT
It can decline, but rather to health reasons, or mental issues. Example: Marlon Brando. I concede your point, there! |
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Dec 25, 2018 16:16:39 GMT
Arya from Game of Thrones Jared Leto Charlie Sheen Arya from Game of Thrones: Bad choice since she's too young to have ever established a career worth judging. And the writing of a role cannot be underestimated when judging the quality of a performance--actors can only work with what they are given, and if they aren't given much, they can't show their skills. Well of course she can't help the bad writing. But pretty much all the other actors were still able to deliver good performances despite the writing quality drop. Haha. You use the Oscars as a guide for what is good or not? Wow, that's sad. The Oscars don't mean chit. I assume you're talking about his performance in Dallas Buyers Club. It was a clear "give me an award" role. It's sad that you could not see that. And his performance as the Joker was a joke. So bad that I actually felt bad and embarrassed for him. I don't know what you're on about. He became a drunk/drug addict weirdo in the later portion of his career and didn't really do anything apart from that terrible Half Men show. Wrong. As I already did just that. |
|
