|
|
Post by hi224 on Oct 12, 2018 4:42:41 GMT
I am hoping the movies sublime as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jep Gambardella on Oct 12, 2018 15:55:01 GMT
I am seeing it very soon. I am very disappointed that it is not showing on the best of the two IMAX theatres that we have here in Montreal, only on the one I call "fake IMAX".
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 12, 2018 15:57:55 GMT
Bring your little American flag and wave it high and proud  . |
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Oct 12, 2018 15:58:31 GMT
I am seeing it tonight in IMAX.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Oct 12, 2018 18:42:47 GMT
going in now, cant wait...
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Oct 12, 2018 19:11:05 GMT
I could have seen it for free a few days ago, but I wanted to see it in imax.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2018 19:16:09 GMT
I was excited to go see this until I found out it was shot entirely with handheld cameras. I'm so tired of that trend.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Oct 12, 2018 19:23:58 GMT
I was excited to go see this until I found out it was shot entirely with handheld cameras. I'm so tired of that trend. IN RUSSIA, HANDHELD CAMERA HOLD YOU!  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 12, 2018 19:43:37 GMT
I was excited to go see this until I found out it was shot entirely with handheld cameras. I'm so tired of that trend. IN RUSSIA, HANDHELD CAMERA HOLD YOU! KA-POW!!!!!!!!1 |
|
|
|
Post by moviemanjackson on Oct 13, 2018 5:03:06 GMT
Had a busy week. Was supposed to go on Tue, but I kind of balked at the 2:30 runtime with a 7:30 PM start. I was gonna get home at 10:30 EST minimum. I think I'll get a physical screener so I'll wait to see then lol.
|
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Oct 13, 2018 5:15:07 GMT
I was excited to go see this until I found out it was shot entirely with handheld cameras. I'm so tired of that trend. I just came back from seeing it. It was distracting. Hand-held filmmaking is good for creating realism, documentaries, and emotionally intense scenes, but drama films like this should have more firmly held cameras. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2018 17:11:43 GMT
Christ I can see its 70 million budget on screen. APOLLO 13 had better effects.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 13, 2018 20:53:00 GMT
I was excited to go see this until I found out it was shot entirely with handheld cameras. I'm so tired of that trend. The camerawork in this movie is by far the worst thing about it. The 'action' scenes are shaky as hell, which is bad enough, but the camera almost never stays still. And worse, the director seems to be in love with close-ups. It felt like virtually every shot in the film was a close-up, sometimes so close that you couldn't even see the whole of a person's face. It annoyed the hell out of me after a while. |
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Oct 13, 2018 21:55:55 GMT
I was excited to go see this until I found out it was shot entirely with handheld cameras. I'm so tired of that trend. its not shot entirely with handheld cameras. |
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Oct 13, 2018 22:00:20 GMT
I liked it, but didnt love it. what bugged me the most is the end. you had so much to pack and unload on people on the moon scene, that we KNOW that happenned and would have been just as if not more emotionally impactful. like them honoring Gagarin or Apollo 1 crew on the moon, which we know they actually did, why not show that? why invent some potential BS of flashbacks with dead daughter and her bracelet. Neither Armstrong nor his wife ever confirmed or even suggested anything like that. Is it POSSIBLE that it happened? Sure. But why have it as the emotional pinnacle of an otherwise realistic movie? Grrr. Felt cheap because of it. I wish there had been something more subtle re the dead daughter on the moon, if you had to go that way, at least. But this was just a cheap tear jerker. Worked, I cried, happy? But like the movie less because of it. I recommend that everybody interested in Space exploration and Moon landing sees the movie called The last Man on The Moon. That worked more for me. |
|
|
|
Post by azzajones on Oct 13, 2018 22:44:40 GMT
Bit of an odd film with the silent emotionless Armstrong, although considering that's how Armstrong was I'm not sure how else they could've done the film.
I enjoyed it well enough, with space sequences done well and the FX being pretty good.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Oct 13, 2018 23:31:09 GMT
this was good, not great, don't think i would ever watch again
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 14, 2018 5:42:56 GMT
I was excited to go see this until I found out it was shot entirely with handheld cameras. I'm so tired of that trend. The camerawork in this movie is by far the worst thing about it. The 'action' scenes are shaky as hell, which is bad enough, but the camera almost never stays still. And worse, the director seems to be in love with close-ups. It felt like virtually every shot in the film was a close-up, sometimes so close that you couldn't even see the whole of a person's face. It annoyed the hell out of me after a while. That's exactly the style of directing that I cannot stand. Shame. I usually love space travel movies. |
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Oct 15, 2018 17:16:46 GMT
Sounds like it had less than a stellar debut. $16.5 million and third place.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Oct 17, 2018 7:15:07 GMT
Sounds like it had less than a stellar debut. $16.5 million and third place. yeah what a shame as well. |
|
.
