|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 0:17:34 GMT
You can choose up to three
And for this list I am not adding movies like Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, Avengers: Age of Ultron or even Man of Steel. Because down to brass these movies might have under-performed but I chose a list of the Top 10 Bottom of the barrel.
Discuss.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 0:19:32 GMT
Making well over a billion is under-performing?
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 0:22:08 GMT
Those movies were supposed to be... better.
But my intention was not to start a troll war with tose movies as we know they are not the best of either house, but these I mentioned are the worst.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 0:24:41 GMT
To each their own. I just have a hard time labeling Age of Ultron as having under-performed when its a part of the billion dollar club.
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 0:27:20 GMT
Oh I LOVE A:AoU.
But to be fair Marvel's The Avengers, Captain America: Civil War were better.
Marvel's The Avengers was a tough act to follow.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 0:33:01 GMT
I knew from the moment The Avengers was such a smash hit, that whatever Avengers 2 ended up being was going to have a hard time following it up. Pretty standard struggles for any sequel to a film that struck a chord with audiences from almost the word "go".
The Captain America trilogy tends to be the cream of the crop as far the whole MCU goes at the moment, but it'd be great if they rolled out some steed competition for their position at/near the top. I think Guardians Vol. 2, Homecoming, and Black Panther have the potential to challenge them.
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 0:50:31 GMT
And don't forget Captain Marvel.
I think casting Alison Bree was a good choice.
And I agree that the Caps Trilogy has been improving upwards, and Guardians of the Galaxy seems to follow that pattern.
But Doctor Strange was really good and I still have hopes that Thor: Ragnarok can redeem itslef.
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 0:51:35 GMT
At the time of this post FANT4STIC and BATMAN & ROBIN are tied.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 1:13:04 GMT
Her, too. She's set a little farther along, more towards Phase 4.
I have good feelings about Thor: Ragnarok, too.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Feb 13, 2017 1:41:14 GMT
more of you need to see the horrendousness of Catwoman, Batman & Robin is stupid AF, but Catwoman is unwatchable.
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 1:51:16 GMT
I think that Batman & Robin is more unforgivable as it is the same franchise that kicked off everything with BATMAN 89'
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 2:48:37 GMT
The Hulk (2003) is much worse.
|
|
|
Post by connork1011 on Feb 13, 2017 3:01:03 GMT
Gosh. Catwoman, Elektra, Steel, and Howard the Duck aren't even in the same league as Batman & Robin. At least that one's fun to watch. Why is Hulk (2003) on here? It wasn't THAT bad.
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 3:02:59 GMT
Because Batman & Robin had no excuse to suck that bad, nor did FANT4STIC, nor did HULK (2003)
|
|
|
Post by connork1011 on Feb 13, 2017 3:08:48 GMT
Batman & Robin was a glorified toy commercial. I don't think WB was worried about making a good movie, only one that would sell a lot of toys. Fant4stic SHOULD have been good, but disagreements between the studio and director rendered it a pile of crap. Hulk is underrated in my opinion. It's a more introspective film, which is something I don't think a lot of people want when it comes to Hulk.
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 3:11:47 GMT
HULK had horrendous CGI and it was just a bad movie.
FANT4STIC was a movie with NO intend to please the fans, Josh Trank even called Comic Book readers "basement dwelling virgins/racists". Not the best way to get butts in seats.
And the fact that WB didn't even try to make a good movie w Batman & Robin earns it a place on this list.
|
|
|
Post by connork1011 on Feb 13, 2017 3:13:19 GMT
Poor CGI doesn't make a movie bad. A bad story does. Hulk's story was okay.
|
|
|
Post by gomezaddams666 on Feb 13, 2017 3:20:13 GMT
Poor CGI doesn't make a movie bad. A bad story does. Hulk's story was okay. when compared to its contemporaries? Heck, I'd watch BenDevil again before HULK
|
|
|
Post by connork1011 on Feb 13, 2017 3:30:48 GMT
To each his own.
|
|
|
Post by MCDemuth on Feb 13, 2017 3:53:04 GMT
The Hulk (2003) is much worse. I agree The story was confusing... I still don't understand what the main plot of the movie was about. The Hulk looked terrible. And the Hulk being able to jump several miles was too much for me. A movie is completely bad, when you find yourself watching it a couple of times, and you still can understand what the plot of the story was. Even if I wasn't a fan of the TV Show with Bill Bixby & Lou Ferrigno... The Incredible Hulk (2008), was much better. And the homages to the TV Show just "sweetened the pot." I considered voting for Howard The Duck, because it is not a movie I enjoy seeing, and I do understand why so many other people do not like it either... But as I understand it was based on a comic book, which I didn't know until recently, so I guess it wasn't too far off of the source material... That doesn't make the movie bad. I just don't like the character.
|
|