|
Post by ck100 on Oct 29, 2018 18:53:28 GMT
Post pictures of actresses you like in sexy lingerie. More specifically outfits like a negligee, teddy, nightie, laced underwear, stockings and garter, etc. Not often we see actresses in outfits like these instead of a simple bra and panties.
Liv Tyler:
Salma Hayek:
Penelope Cruz:
Julianne Moore:
Jessica Chastain:
|
|
|
Post by MCDemuth on Oct 29, 2018 20:04:06 GMT
Ginger RogersA promotional photo for "Professional Sweetheart" (1933) Suzanne Pleshette
|
|
|
Post by Sandman on Oct 29, 2018 20:34:08 GMT
Post pictures of actresses you like in sexy lingerie. More specifically outfits like a negligee, teddy, nightie, laced underwear, stockings and garter, etc. Not often we see actresses in outfits like these instead of a simple bra and panties. Alyssa Milano Carla Gugino Scarlett Johansson Kate Winslet Vera Farmiga [img src="https://media1.popsugar-assets.com/files/thumbor/UWE1k-vN1ICPPhHQALCQerN2k_Q/fit-in/1024x1024/filters:format_auto-!!-:strip_icc-!!-/2011/11 /46/0/192/1922398/bf1b455da1188689_2418249/i/Scarlett-performed-Pussycat-Dolls-Viper-Room-2004.jpg" alt=" "]
|
|
|
Post by Chalice_Of_Evil on Oct 30, 2018 8:16:36 GMT
Alice Eve. Alycia Debnam-Carey. Anna Silk. Deborah Ann Woll. Felicity Jones. Jenna Dewan. Kelly Brook.
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Oct 30, 2018 11:21:28 GMT
Maureen O`Sullivan
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Oct 30, 2018 15:09:49 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Sulla on Oct 31, 2018 1:31:57 GMT
Paulina Porizkova
Olivia Wilde
Kate Beckinsale
Jaime Pressly
Milla Jovovich
|
|
|
Post by Roberto on Oct 31, 2018 9:03:52 GMT
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 14, 2018 15:10:29 GMT
Grace Kelly looked alluring in her sheer nightgown from "Dial M For Murder"
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 15, 2018 5:16:31 GMT
Grace Kelly looked alluring in her sheer nightgown from "Dial M For Murder" Are you turning Mr. D? Heck, no! But "Dial M For Murder" was my very first Hitchcock movie. I was probably ten years old at the time and I thought the super complicated plotline was riveting. And I remember reading somewhere that when the phone rings and wakes her up and she turns on the light in the hallway, you can see the outline of her feminine figure, and this was, of course, on purpose. Hitchcock loved blondes! I wonder how many people know that he was something of a pervert? Have you seen the movie, Toasted Cheese?
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 15, 2018 5:21:42 GMT
Oh, how sexy and playful is that?! Woah! The fact that most guys love their own genitalia is so much fun and one of my favorite things about guys. (Yes, Virginia, Freud was right. There IS such a thing as penis envy. But ladies get to have fun with their boobs, so I don't know exactly what their problem is...) The way this hunk is doing his dance and checking himself out is both hot and hilarious. Who is he?
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 15, 2018 6:14:12 GMT
Oh, how sexy and playful is that?! Woah! The fact that most guys love their own genitalia is so much fun and one of my favorite things about guys. (Yes, Virginia, Freud was right. There IS such a thing as penis envy. But ladies get to have fun with their boobs, so I don't know exactly what their problem is...) The way this hunk is doing his dance and checking himself out is both hot and hilarious. Who is he? I don't know who he is, but he is just looks so typical clueless male awkward that he is gorgeous in his sexy and clumsy masculinity. I was looking for a hot male celebrity in underwear, to counter all the straight male creeps on here sexualizing their feminine jerk off fantasies. Anyone would think they are latent transvestites, or want to be female themselves so they can feel themselves up.
Male to Male is just one and the same and operates on an entirely different sphere\dynamic of sexuality and this guy, just on his own, pretty much has all these women beat hands down if looked at from a raw, authentic and unpretentious and base sexual allure. Who wants the poser when you can have this? Oh, clumsiness in men can be so appealing!!! Debonair has never done much for me. Great point.
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 15, 2018 6:21:59 GMT
Heck, no! But "Dial M For Murder" was my very first Hitchcock movie. I was probably ten years old at the time and I thought the super complicated plotline was riveting. And I remember reading somewhere that when the phone rings and wakes her up and she turns on the light in the hallway, you can see the outline of her feminine figure, and this was, of course, on purpose. Hitchcock loved blondes! I wonder how many people know that he was something of a pervert? Have you seen the movie, Toasted Cheese? I think much of his sexual fantasies is depicted in many of his films. He was about breaking taboos and had to be subtle in parts as well. Hitchcock didn't care one iota for censorship. The fact that it was there to block him, made him even more clever, because he had to skirt around things and if he was allowed to be brazen and bold like today, his films wouldn't have had the same impact, or even subtle subversiveness.
I recall seeing DMFM on t.v in the 80's. Not sure if I have seen again. I have seen North By Northwest, Psycho, The Birds and Frenzy the most. I have seen Strangers On A Train once, and that left an indelible memory implant.
The ways that filmmakers like Hitchcock got their point across and the subtle subversiveness that you mention was charming and engaging and even exhilarating whereas today's blatant realism is usually a huge turn off. The great raw grit of the 70s notwithstanding, reality in today's movies is smug and overbaked and bland and as compelling as a tv commercial. It's a horrible brew.
|
|
|
Post by SuperDevilDoctor on Dec 15, 2018 7:06:29 GMT
|
|
Skreebert
Freshman
@bigguns
Posts: 70
Likes: 33
|
Post by Skreebert on Dec 15, 2018 16:52:20 GMT
Oh yeah. More please.
|
|
|
Post by Sandman on Dec 16, 2018 0:55:39 GMT
Angelina Jolie Kate Beckinsale Jennifer Lawrence
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Dec 16, 2018 4:38:33 GMT
Nice thread.
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 16, 2018 4:43:59 GMT
The ways that filmmakers like Hitchcock got their point across and the subtle subversiveness that you mention was charming and engaging and even exhilarating whereas today's blatant realism is usually a huge turn off. The great raw grit of the 70s notwithstanding, reality in today's movies is smug and overbaked and bland and as compelling as a tv commercial. It's a horrible brew. Wonderfully put Mr. Dirty!
Many films today that want to be in your face, just go way overboard and don't know when to stop. I don't mind gore and graphic violence and strong sexulity, but the presentation and context of it is key. The recent Halloween is a key example. No real scares or suspense, just turgid and overbearing scenes of shock value.
I thought "North by Northwest" was okay, but a little boring and basically a couple really cool set pieces and not a lot else. I think it's kind of over-rated, but not as over-rated as "Vertigo". "Psycho" is my favorite Hitchcock movie, followed by "Dial M For Murder", then "Strangers on a Train" (Robert Walker was super creepy, and Marion Lorne was charming and sweet and exasperating, I really like this one), then "Rebecca", then "The Birds", which I would still give ***1/2. "Frenzy" was okay, with some funny dark humor, but also a couple of very unpleasant rape/strangulation scenes. I prefer the follow-up, "Family", mostly because I love Karen Black and Barbara Harris. And, then, I liked "The Lady Vanishes" and "Notorious" and "The Man Who Knew Too Much", then "Marnie", where I think Tippi Hedren gave the better performance of her two Hitchcock films. And I do like "Rear Window" a lot, very clever and charming and I would have liked even better if somebody besdies Jimmy Stewart had played the lead role.
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 17, 2018 5:17:01 GMT
I thought "North by Northwest" was okay, but a little boring and basically a couple really cool set pieces and not a lot else. I think it's kind of over-rated, but not as over-rated as "Vertigo". "Psycho" is my favorite Hitchcock movie, followed by "Dial M For Murder", then "Strangers on a Train" (Robert Walker was super creepy, and Marion Lorne was charming and sweet and exasperating, I really like this one), then "Rebecca", then "The Birds", which I would still give ***1/2. "Frenzy" was okay, with some funny dark humor, but also a couple of very unpleasant rape/strangulation scenes. I prefer the follow-up, "Family", mostly because I love Karen Black and Barbara Harris. And, then, I liked "The Lady Vanishes" and "Notorious" and "The Man Who Knew Too Much", then "Marnie", where I think Tippi Hedren gave the better performance of her two Hitchcock films. And I do like "Rear Window" a lot, very clever and charming and I would have liked even better if somebody besdies Jimmy Stewart had played the lead role. I have perhaps seen North By Northwest about 4 times. I was quite impressed the first time, but on the other viewings, I started to see it as pretty much ho-hum. The last time wasn't so long ago and if it wasn't for the charisma of Grant, it is as dated and as mediocre as they come.
I don't have your repertoire with older films and you have seen more Hitchcock than me. I have only ever seen Family Plot as a staggered viewing many many moons ago and will need to re-visit. Of course it also has Barbara Harris in it, so that is a draw card as well, same as Black.
I am not a mega fan of Psycho and I think the first part is terrific, I just start to lose some interest in the proceedings once Marion is disposed of and I find the rest of it all rather routine. Of course I can't say the same for Psycho II, which engages me right through to the end. Perkins was all round great here and Tilly also involves me and I like the chemistry and connection between them.
To be honest with you, I started watching Vertigo and just couldn't get into it. I have also seen the last 20mins. I pretty much feel the same way as you regarding Jimmy Stewart and while I like Rear Window, I would watch it more for Grace Kelly.
I would have to say for enjoyment factor, my favorite is The Birds, followed by Frenzy. I find it very entertaining and suspenseful, even though the killer is not a mystery. I also adore Jon Finch. What a hunk! It is worth slogging through Polanski's Macbeth just for him. Did you know Mr. Dirty, that Jon Finch is the handsome Scotsman that Peter Finch picks up in Sunday Bloody Sunday. Lucky bugger! It was disappointing to read the Michael Caine turned down the role of killer in Frenzy because he didn't like the character at the time. I really do need to see Strangers On A Train again, but I liked it the first time I saw it, so no qualms here.
I loved Marnie the first time I saw it, but on repeat viewing I wasn't quite as engaged with it. It is perhaps still one of the more under-rated Hitchcock's and it still has an interesting story and Sean Connery of course. Hmmmmm! Connery and Jon Finch together, the mind just boggles..... Jon Finch was very, very handsome! Yes, I did recognize him in SBS. Too bad Peter Finch took so long getting his prescription getting filled! As far as watching "Macbeth", I am probaboy not the best person to ask as I just have never been able to get into Shakespeare. I suppose as adaptations go, Polanski's version is livelier than most (also it's rather gruesome, and MANY critics blasted Polanski for obviously using his bloody killings as some kind of catharsis for what happened to his pregnant wife and his friends. This attitude or POV on the part of the critics has always annoyed, even angered me. Why shouldn't he use his life experience creatively, to get something out of his system? It's his, he owns it. And it's a damn sight better than turning into a psychopathic thug or begin to self-destruct. All of which besides, Macbeth is, I think, considered one of WS most violent plays.) That's too bad that Caine turned down the role of the killer in "Frenzy". He must have really disliked the role/movie (or maybe even Hitchcock himself, though I can't see Michael Caine disliking anybody.) to have turned it down because he seems to hardly ever turn down a movie. And just think, he took the killer in "Frenzy" and took the outlandish factor several steps further 8 years later when he played murderous transsexual "Bobbie" in "Dressed to Kill". (Which movie do you like better, btw: "Dressed to Kill"or the original "Psycho"?) "Strangers on a Train" is excellent. All the great Hitchcock touches are there, plus a super charismatic lead performance by Robert Walker and some good comic relief by Marion Lorne. The movie could hardly have been made better! I like "Marnie" quite a bit. It has a very interesting storyline, there's some good tension and I think Tippi Hedren gives a better performance than in "The Birds". Sean Connery is delectable.
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Dec 17, 2018 21:20:35 GMT
dirtypillows ...That's too bad that Caine turned down the role of the killer in "Frenzy". He must have really disliked the role/movie (or maybe even Hitchcock himself, though I can't see Michael Caine disliking anybody.) to have turned it down because he seems to hardly ever turn down a movie. And just think, he took the killer in "Frenzy" and took the outlandish factor several steps further 8 years later when he played murderous transsexual "Bobbie" in "Dressed to Kill". (Which movie do you like better, btw: "Dressed to Kill"or the original "Psycho"?) ...
____________________________
I don't recall Caine saying much about this role in his book I am still reading The Elephant To Hollywood—nearly finished and haven't read his first book—but he did comment that that neither Hitchcock and De Palma were exactly Mr. Warmth, but were both technically brilliant and cool directors, not that he ever worked with Hitchcock. He thinks that Dressed To Kill is a bloody good thriller and it still scares him. He said atmosphere is what it is more about in scary movies, than the actors making connections with the audience. Though myself, it doesn't hurt to have both, so I am not sure if I agree with him here. He also credits DTK as resurrecting his career.
I would say perhaps Caine had a change of heart by the late 70's, but I don't understand why he would turn down an opportunity to work with a master, when he was still a relatively new face on the scene. Frenzy does have some disturbing sequences, but it is by no means a graphically violent film. Hitchcock was able to show more in Frenzy, due to more lax censorship standards by the early 70's, but he didn't go overboard by any means.
That is a difficult question to answer Mr. Dirty and a goodie. Psycho is a classic landmark film and Dressed To Kill is a Hitchcock homage. Both are classic thrillers, but since I really only enjoy the first part of Psycho, and find myself more involved in all of DTK, I may have to say the latter. I will say though, that I was a disappointed in DTK when I first saw it in the early 80's at a tiny retro cinema. I found it a bore. The NZ censor had cut out the entire elevator murder once Dickinson was inside, and this sequence was already censored by the MPAA. I wasn't aware of this at the time, until I saw it on home video and started to appreciate the technique of the film.
I now have the full then 'X' rated version of DTK on blu ray.
That's cool that Caine said that DTK resurrected his career. I guess I should answer my own question, but it is very hard for me. Oh, Mother, I'll take a stab in the dark and say that "Psycho" is my 28th favorite film of all time, and "Dressed to Kill" is my 34th favorite film of all time. So, Norman bounces Bobbie by a nudge. There was one very disturbing scene for me in "Frenzy"; it is the office rape/strangulation scene. The scene plays outy an unrelieved horror and actually delivers on the promise and then some. When she starts reciting the Lord's Prayer, I knew I was in for it! Yikes! It's a very well-done scene, totally effective, but it's just too intense for lil ole me. I actually have skipped through the entire scene. The part in the potato truck didn't bother me, and I thought the Inspector's wife was hilarious, cooking up all those grotesque concoctions. I liked Hitchcock's next movie better. It is somewhat mild, but affable and amusing and it does come with pretty high replay value, I think. No great shakes, but he could have done much worse. I know I prefer "Family Plot" to "Vertigo", but that says more about how much I don't like the 1958 over-rater.
|
|