How much do you disagree with this theory

i do think jon may represent both ice and fire ....i think when HBO goes back in time with the prequels will get to see more of the targaryens and how they conquered but i dont think ice and fire is about that , maybe it is just a bit , little shireen kept reading about the targaryens and the story she told her father before she was sacrificed was chilling IMO and it will play out like that i think dragon Vs dragon- i too believe sansa will be queen i just dont believe jon will die

Feologild Oakes If your asking what the story will ultimately be about plot-wise rather than thematically, then I'll say in Martin's initial outline he said the story would be split into three parts.

Part one would be the war of the five kings, part two Dany's invasion of Westeros and part three the battle against the Others. Originally all three parts would be covered in a novel each, but the number of books in the series continued to increase as he wrote. It's possible that part two and three will be greatly condensed now, but I think the original outline is still pretty much the crux of the story.

So in answer to your question, I'd say the Targaryen's reclaiming the throne, (whether they succeed or fail) is only a portion of a much larger overarching plot.

Obviously not since the first thing that happened after Aegon's death was division again and the whole thing culminated in decades of civil war.
If anything, what Targaryen history shows is that while power can help do good things, the strife around that power can undo them. Only the terminally naive can believe that Daenerys was ever meant to prevail.

When he says "I don't think that…" he is acting as someone expressing an opinion, not a fact. Stop being a moron. Stop being at all.
No one in this world needs your kind.

Wow thanks for sharing that!



So basically the throne might actually not mean a damn thing in the end? That would be quite interesting and a surprising ending if nobody really sat on the throne and the kingdoms just kinda rebuilt themselves. That would explain the actors talking about how unexpected it is in my eyes. It would also explain why the show is ending with such few episodes. White walker is defeated but most everyone dies..... that’s my theory anyway

Given that masses of the brainless kind expect Daenerys to win the day, anything else can be called "unexpected" but of course, an even larger proportion of the audience expects the story to still be about the Iron Throne. It is in the name of the show and up to the last season, we have characters who do intend to take it by force so that expectation is legitimate. 

Yet, everyone agrees to see the real struggle elsewhere and "the Great War" is meant to be the kind of major shock that drains resources and makes empires fall. The Holy Roman Empire fell under the Napoleonic Wars, both the Habsburg Austro-Hungarian and the German empires fell with the end of the First World War. It only makes sense that the "Seven Kingdoms of Westeros" follow the same path, with King's Landing losing significance.

Cersei still controls the Lannister forces and has access to the Reach but should this be expended in war, conquering the rest will make little sense and the rest itself would have no reason to want to change anything. A fragmented structure is the logical outcome.