|
|
Post by drystyx on Feb 17, 2019 23:19:53 GMT
There is no such thing as "Karma".
"Karma" is a word that demon possessed people use in order to rationalize and justify hate and evil against other people, and always innocent people. If there was such a thing as "Karma", not one president, senator, or representative would be in office, not one baby would be aborted while murderers are allowed second and third chances, and the list goes on.
In fact, in lieu of the above "facts" it's obvious we have the exact opposite of "Karma" in effect in this world, which is proof of demonic influence, proof completely obvious to anyone with an IQ over 23.32353
"Karma" is a lie. It is a word used only by the most demon possessed people, and I want none of them around me. When they are all in one place in judgment day, that place will be a Hell simply because it is full of people who worship the lie of "Karma" and seek to justify the hurt on the others by using that word. I pray I'm never around such monsters ever again.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 17, 2019 23:33:27 GMT
Karma means, "What goes around comes around," doesn't it? I think I've seen a few examples of this during my brief stay among these earth creatures. The Bible says, "As you sow, so shall you reap." I'm not getting what makes one right and the other wrong when they appear to be saying the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Feb 17, 2019 23:42:27 GMT
There is no such thing as "Karma". "Karma" is a word that demon possessed people use in order to rationalize and justify hate and evil against other people, and always innocent people. If there was such a thing as "Karma", not one president, senator, or representative would be in office, not one baby would be aborted while murderers are allowed second and third chances, and the list goes on. In fact, in lieu of the above "facts" it's obvious we have the exact opposite of "Karma" in effect in this world, which is proof of demonic influence, proof completely obvious to anyone with an IQ over 23.32353 "Karma" is a lie. It is a word used only by the most demon possessed people, and I want none of them around me. When they are all in one place in judgment day, that place will be a Hell simply because it is full of people who worship the lie of "Karma" and seek to justify the hurt on the others by using that word. I pray I'm never around such monsters ever again. There but for the grace of Karma go I.  |
|
|
|
Post by Catman on Feb 17, 2019 23:49:35 GMT
And here Catman thought Karma Chagme was the 17th-century Tibetan lama who founded the Neydo Kagyu sub-school of the Karma Kagyu.
|
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Feb 17, 2019 23:50:01 GMT
My karma ran over your dogma. Sorry!
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Feb 18, 2019 0:23:48 GMT
Karma means, "What goes around comes around," doesn't it? I think I've seen a few examples of this during my brief stay among these earth creatures. The Bible says, "As you sow, so shall you reap." I'm not getting what makes one right and the other wrong when they appear to be saying the same. What you sow you reap in the judgment, not here. I think that's obvious. One way or another, in either Trump or Hillary, I believe no one here can deny that no Karma has approached those two. Same for all the others. I've seen people claim Karma for their evil deeds too often, many against myself, claiming Karma over false accusations. I therefore am sure the same is true for others falsely accused. |
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Feb 18, 2019 0:35:32 GMT
And this whole time I thought it was just some word Boy George made up
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Feb 18, 2019 0:49:03 GMT
And this whole time I thought it was just some word Boy George made up I love that song. True story. Back around the year 2001, my boss at the auto auction, for some reason thought I was cool, and had me double date with his girl friend's sister, who was really hot, I might say, but really aloof. But she worked with me and knew me, and wanted the date to make her boy friend jealous. Any way, we went to a karaoke bar, and my boss was a country lover, and so were the chicks. There were only six other people there aside from the karaoke guy and the bartender. One table of three country lovers and one table of three people with pierced earrings and blue hair. Any way, my boss sings this country stuff and the country people applaud, and then I get up and karaoke "Karma Chameleon" and the other table applauds. We're far enough away so no one can hear our table, and my boss asks "What the Hell was that shit?" And I say, "Hey, all the normal people with the blue hair liked it." They loved that. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Feb 18, 2019 2:55:49 GMT
I love that song. True story. Back around the year 2001, my boss at the auto auction, for some reason thought I was cool, and had me double date with his girl friend's sister, who was really hot, I might say, but really aloof. But she worked with me and knew me, and wanted the date to make her boy friend jealous. Any way, we went to a karaoke bar, and my boss was a country lover, and so were the chicks. There were only six other people there aside from the karaoke guy and the bartender. One table of three country lovers and one table of three people with pierced earrings and blue hair. Any way, my boss sings this country stuff and the country people applaud, and then I get up and karaoke "Karma Chameleon" and the other table applauds. We're far enough away so no one can hear our table, and my boss asks "What the Hell was that shit?" And I say, "Hey, all the normal people with the blue hair liked it." They loved that. Little old ladies with blue hair liked it? Seriously though, I agree with you. Karma is not "what goes around comes around". That's basic logic, rules of cause and effect. There is no religion more full of silly superstition than Buddhism. Karma in Buddhism and Hinduism is some magical essence which attaches itself to souls and even survives death. So as you're saying, in Buddhist superstition, a person who is good or evil is not even fully responsible for their actions in this life. There is some imaginary factor called "karma" from some imaginary previous life which controls your fate, not logical rational "cause and effect". Why do Western atheists so love Buddhism? So you don't think there's any kind of Newtonian action-reaction thing going on? |
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Feb 18, 2019 2:57:18 GMT
ENJOY:
HIT IT!
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Feb 18, 2019 13:07:09 GMT
So you don't think there's any kind of Newtonian action-reaction thing going on? Yes, but that's not karma. Karma is tied into reincarnation. When a good person suffers in this life the Buddhist priest will tell them they're paying for evil in a past life. That's superstitious ignorance. I'm an atheist but Christianity makes more sense. Most times when the phrase is used (or when I’ve seen it used) it’s not used with the full understanding of the religious belief surrounding it. It have a feeling that the OP is more outraged by the demonic attitude of non-believers. One of my older brothers is a Buddhist but he’s very non-demonic and doesn’t go around making biased judgements about others like the OP does. |
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Feb 18, 2019 18:32:47 GMT
Yes, but that's not karma. Karma is tied into reincarnation. When a good person suffers in this life the Buddhist priest will tell them they're paying for evil in a past life. That's superstitious ignorance. I'm an atheist but Christianity makes more sense. Most times when the phrase is used (or when I’ve seen it used) it’s not used with the full understanding of the religious belief surrounding it. It have a feeling that the OP is more outraged by the demonic attitude of non-believers. One of my older brothers is a Buddhist but he’s very non-demonic and doesn’t go around making biased judgements about others like the OP does. You just proved my point. I named absolutely no one in my post, so your accusation about me is not only false and ignorant, but proves my very point. Thank you for illustrating my point so well. You've proven you have unprovoked hatred. And you have zero credibility. How ironic that you accuse me of being biased, when my post cannot possibly be taken as such, and falsely accuse me of judging someone when I named zero people. Are you that severely uneducated? But thanks again for illustrating my point. Your unprovoked ranting is quite sufficient. |
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Feb 18, 2019 18:53:55 GMT
Most times when the phrase is used (or when I’ve seen it used) it’s not used with the full understanding of the religious belief surrounding it. It have a feeling that the OP is more outraged by the demonic attitude of non-believers. One of my older brothers is a Buddhist but he’s very non-demonic and doesn’t go around making biased judgements about others like the OP does. You just proved my point. I named absolutely no one in my post, so your accusation about me is not only false and ignorant, but proves my very point. Thank you for illustrating my point so well. You've proven you have unprovoked hatred. And you have zero credibility. How ironic that you accuse me of being biased, when my post cannot possibly be taken as such, and falsely accuse me of judging someone when I named zero people. Are you that severely uneducated? But thanks again for illustrating my point. Your unprovoked ranting is quite sufficient. Did I say you had named anyone in the OP?  |
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Feb 18, 2019 19:37:19 GMT
You just proved my point. I named absolutely no one in my post, so your accusation about me is not only false and ignorant, but proves my very point. Thank you for illustrating my point so well. You've proven you have unprovoked hatred. And you have zero credibility. How ironic that you accuse me of being biased, when my post cannot possibly be taken as such, and falsely accuse me of judging someone when I named zero people. Are you that severely uneducated? But thanks again for illustrating my point. Your unprovoked ranting is quite sufficient. Did I say you had named anyone in the OP? Yes. You made another epic fail. It can't be biased if it's a definitive statement. "Karma" is a hate word used by demonic people. No names there. It can't be biased, because "Karma", by definition, is a term of convenience for people to use to rationalize and justify what happens to others. To be "biased", I have to name someone, or speak without knowledge. I demonstrated that I have the knowledge, whereas you simply demonstrated irrational emotion and unprovoked hate. You were a hypocrite to falsely accuse me of being biased. You have again proved my point with your illogical rant. Very ironic that you are the one making biased judgments, while I simply stated definitive facts. The religions that embrace Karma do it out of convenience. That's not speculation. That's fact. It's done to "rationalize", and every single atrocity ever committed has had its roots in both "convenience" and "rationalization". The Khmer Rouge, the Nazi party, Ho Chi, Stalin, all of them. You can't deny this without being a liar or a moron. |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Feb 18, 2019 20:30:18 GMT
I think of karma as 'your path' or simply what happens to you, without any positive or negative connotations.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Feb 18, 2019 20:49:04 GMT
Did I say you had named anyone in the OP? Yes. You made another epic fail. It can't be biased if it's a definitive statement. "Karma" is a hate word used by demonic people. No names there. It can't be biased, because "Karma", by definition, is a term of convenience for people to use to rationalize and justify what happens to others. To be "biased", I have to name someone, or speak without knowledge. I demonstrated that I have the knowledge, whereas you simply demonstrated irrational emotion and unprovoked hate. You were a hypocrite to falsely accuse me of being biased. You have again proved my point with your illogical rant. Very ironic that you are the one making biased judgments, while I simply stated definitive facts. The religions that embrace Karma do it out of convenience. That's not speculation. That's fact. It's done to "rationalize", and every single atrocity ever committed has had its roots in both "convenience" and "rationalization". The Khmer Rouge, the Nazi party, Ho Chi, Stalin, all of them. You can't deny this without being a liar or a moron. But you are using "confirmation bias" and have only mentioned examples of "bad Karma" which makes me think you are deliberately discounting the possibility of "good Karma". You are the one making a biased judgement against people who believe in Karma (which I don't) but I do know of one person who follows the Buddhist faith and is certainly not "demonic" in any way. |
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Feb 18, 2019 20:54:23 GMT
I think of karma as 'your path' or simply what happens to you, without any positive or negative connotations. In theory, on paper, if one takes a materialist view, one may feel comfortable to apply that. However, that's like the boos at the desk sending the agent out into the field, thinking paper rules apply in real life. If there were no demons, no devil, afflicting the human brain, one could try to apply that rule, as a passive karma. But the reality is that all humans have demons and the devil afflicting our every thought, and we have to be on guard all the time. You, Sam, I'm sure, are aware of this. with experience is aware of it. "Karma" as a thought process, feeds the demon, because it enables the "judgment" of others, as Stammer so well demonstrated. He says his brother is passive, and it could be, though only a fool would trust someone who believes in "karma". A person could believe in "karma" and as long as all was well, the passive state might work, but the very first ordeal or scare, and the demon begins to tell karma student Smith that Jones is in the water with sharks because his karma was bad, and since Smith may run out of water in the lifeboat, Smith is beset by the demons to think such a way, and the ideal of "karma" enables this attitude and action. Christianity has no enabler of judging others. It's just not in the doctrine. If the Christian Jones leaves Smith in the water, Jones does so out of survival, and admits it. It would be wrong, but there is only one demon to overcome as opposed to two forces of evil. In the "field", the ideal of "karma" is always one of convenience, and that is what it is designed for, pure and simple. It is a totally Republican ideal, though the extremist Democrat is no different, even more demon possessed than the Republican. You'll note that an extremist often changes from extreme left to extreme right, and vice versa, but never into the center. Both extremists are dedicated to the ideal of "karma", of judging that others deserve what harm comes to them. They are, by definition, demon possessed. Demons try to possess all of us all the time. I fight them. I'm no different. I could give in to hate the way that Stammer does, and when I was in college, I was like Stammer, ready to pounce upon the outcasts not protected by Western culture, because that is what "Karma ideology" enables. True, a super saint could handle it, but the first step to being a super saint is knowing one can't handle it. A real catch 22. |
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Feb 19, 2019 1:00:03 GMT
I think of karma as 'your path' or simply what happens to you, without any positive or negative connotations. In theory, on paper, if one takes a materialist view, one may feel comfortable to apply that. However, that's like the boos at the desk sending the agent out into the field, thinking paper rules apply in real life. If there were no demons, no devil, afflicting the human brain, one could try to apply that rule, as a passive karma. But the reality is that all humans have demons and the devil afflicting our every thought, and we have to be on guard all the time. You, Sam, I'm sure, are aware of this. with experience is aware of it. "Karma" as a thought process, feeds the demon, because it enables the "judgment" of others, as Stammer so well demonstrated. He says his brother is passive, and it could be, though only a fool would trust someone who believes in "karma". A person could believe in "karma" and as long as all was well, the passive state might work, but the very first ordeal or scare, and the demon begins to tell karma student Smith that Jones is in the water with sharks because his karma was bad, and since Smith may run out of water in the lifeboat, Smith is beset by the demons to think such a way, and the ideal of "karma" enables this attitude and action. Christianity has no enabler of judging others. It's just not in the doctrine. If the Christian Jones leaves Smith in the water, Jones does so out of survival, and admits it. It would be wrong, but there is only one demon to overcome as opposed to two forces of evil. In the "field", the ideal of "karma" is always one of convenience, and that is what it is designed for, pure and simple. It is a totally Republican ideal, though the extremist Democrat is no different, even more demon possessed than the Republican. You'll note that an extremist often changes from extreme left to extreme right, and vice versa, but never into the center. Both extremists are dedicated to the ideal of "karma", of judging that others deserve what harm comes to them. They are, by definition, demon possessed. Demons try to possess all of us all the time. I fight them. I'm no different. I could give in to hate the way that Stammer does, and when I was in college, I was like Stammer, ready to pounce upon the outcasts not protected by Western culture, because that is what "Karma ideology" enables. True, a super saint could handle it, but the first step to being a super saint is knowing one can't handle it. A real catch 22. I'm sorry but all the hate in this thread is coming from you.  |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Feb 19, 2019 1:17:58 GMT
In theory, on paper, if one takes a materialist view, one may feel comfortable to apply that. However, that's like the boos at the desk sending the agent out into the field, thinking paper rules apply in real life. If there were no demons, no devil, afflicting the human brain, one could try to apply that rule, as a passive karma. But the reality is that all humans have demons and the devil afflicting our every thought, and we have to be on guard all the time. You, Sam, I'm sure, are aware of this. with experience is aware of it. "Karma" as a thought process, feeds the demon, because it enables the "judgment" of others, as Stammer so well demonstrated. He says his brother is passive, and it could be, though only a fool would trust someone who believes in "karma". A person could believe in "karma" and as long as all was well, the passive state might work, but the very first ordeal or scare, and the demon begins to tell karma student Smith that Jones is in the water with sharks because his karma was bad, and since Smith may run out of water in the lifeboat, Smith is beset by the demons to think such a way, and the ideal of "karma" enables this attitude and action. Christianity has no enabler of judging others. It's just not in the doctrine. If the Christian Jones leaves Smith in the water, Jones does so out of survival, and admits it. It would be wrong, but there is only one demon to overcome as opposed to two forces of evil. In the "field", the ideal of "karma" is always one of convenience, and that is what it is designed for, pure and simple. It is a totally Republican ideal, though the extremist Democrat is no different, even more demon possessed than the Republican. You'll note that an extremist often changes from extreme left to extreme right, and vice versa, but never into the center. Both extremists are dedicated to the ideal of "karma", of judging that others deserve what harm comes to them. They are, by definition, demon possessed. Demons try to possess all of us all the time. I fight them. I'm no different. I could give in to hate the way that Stammer does, and when I was in college, I was like Stammer, ready to pounce upon the outcasts not protected by Western culture, because that is what "Karma ideology" enables. True, a super saint could handle it, but the first step to being a super saint is knowing one can't handle it. A real catch 22. I'm sorry but all the hate in this thread is coming from you. Dry Sticks is the same user who used to start a thread titled "reincarnation table" where he mentioned which user would be born as what based on their Karma points and would thoroughly judge most of the users on RFS. I think he gave some of the users rebirth as mosquitos and cockroaches. While graced some with birth as superman or something. Usually, Ada got most Karma points. |
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Feb 19, 2019 1:34:11 GMT
I'm sorry but all the hate in this thread is coming from you. Dry Sticks is the same user who used to start a thread titled "reincarnation table" where he mentioned which user would be born as what based on their Karma points and would thoroughly judge most of the users on RFS. I think he gave some of the users rebirth as mosquitos and cockroaches. While graced some with birth as superman or something. Usually, Ada got most Karma points. i want to be reincarnated as something useful like a road sign or a door stop. |
|
