|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 12:01:54 GMT
You talking about when she said she wanted diversity in the media? She wanted racial quotas in media. That sounds pretty racist. It was never said...link it if it was. It was explained to you what a "quota" is...yet you ignore it. Stop being repetitively stupid
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 9, 2019 12:03:16 GMT
She said she isn't interested in what white dudes have to say about a movie for black people. By that rationale, she should only be interested in what women have to say about Captain Wamen as the movie isn't for anyone else. She and D$sney are very lucky that relatively few people are aware of the shit she has been saying and doing for the last year or so. I guess you never saw the whole speach in full? Of course not, because only an idiot would come to that conclusion. Here it is But I guess you still won't watch it. You're right, I won't watch it AGAIN. Once was sufficient. Are you going to tell me that she didn't say the first sentence of my previous post now?
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 12:14:05 GMT
I guess you never saw the whole speach in full? Of course not, because only an idiot would come to that conclusion. Here it is But I guess you still won't watch it. You're right, I won't watch it AGAIN. Once was sufficient. Are you going to tell me that she didn't say the first sentence of my previous post now? Yeah..she said the 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing...and someone oversensitive and already with agenda would take that away and come to your conclusion. But choosing to ignore the rest of the speach explaining why she said that. What is wrong with wanting the more opinions of someone a film was made for. She didn't say white dudes shouldn't review that film...she said she wanted to hear the opinion of its aimed audience, and that audience should be more represented British critic Barry Norman was the most powerful and famous in the country. He openly hated horror films. Never gave them good reviews. Said he wasn't that kind of films audience. Hence I never sought his opinion or review when a horror film was released. I sought the opinions of the "audience" the film was aimed at.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Mar 9, 2019 12:53:46 GMT
You talking about when she said she wanted diversity in the media? She wanted racial quotas in media. That sounds pretty racist. She was being interviewed by a disabled person and said she did research on disabled interviewers and wanted more. That's the diversity she wanted.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 9, 2019 13:12:58 GMT
You're right, I won't watch it AGAIN. Once was sufficient. Are you going to tell me that she didn't say the first sentence of my previous post now? Yeah..she said the 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing...and someone oversensitive and already with agenda would take that away and come to your conclusion. But choosing to ignore the rest of the speach explaining why she said that. What is wrong with wanting the more opinions of someone a film was made for. She didn't say white dudes shouldn't review that film...she said she wanted to hear the opinion of its aimed audience, and that audience should be more represented British critic Barry Norman was the most powerful and famous in the country. He openly hated horror films. Never gave them good reviews. Said he wasn't that kind of films audience. Hence I never sought his opinion or review when a horror film was released. I sought the opinions of the "audience" the film was aimed at. "The 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing."? You mean - "I'm not interested in the opinions of 40 year old white dudes." She said it, she meant it and it's out there. Nobody can take it back. Her general behavior demonstrates that she hates "white dudes." Her father left when she was a teenager and she has clearly had a big problem with that ever since. Anyone who thinks AWiT was ONLY made for black people is out of their mind. It cost a fortune to make. It was intended for EVERYONE. The fact that it's a piece SJW agenda riddled shit, disliked by both critics and audiences, is no reason to decide you are ONLY intertested in the opinion of black people. And if she wants to read the opinion of a black movie critic because she thinks there is more chance of reading something whch reflects her own biased opinion then there are many many options.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 13:41:26 GMT
Yeah..she said the 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing...and someone oversensitive and already with agenda would take that away and come to your conclusion. But choosing to ignore the rest of the speach explaining why she said that. What is wrong with wanting the more opinions of someone a film was made for. She didn't say white dudes shouldn't review that film...she said she wanted to hear the opinion of its aimed audience, and that audience should be more represented British critic Barry Norman was the most powerful and famous in the country. He openly hated horror films. Never gave them good reviews. Said he wasn't that kind of films audience. Hence I never sought his opinion or review when a horror film was released. I sought the opinions of the "audience" the film was aimed at. "The 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing."? You mean - "I'm not interested in the opinions of 40 year old white dudes." She said it, she meant it and it's out there. Nobody can take it back. No she said "I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color." Despite saying she doesn't hate white dudes throughout the speech, let's resort to your faux psychology She is interested in the opinion of those other than "white dudes"...what's wrong with that. The speech was not about wanting to hear only what the target audience had to say, but that women and people of colour were not given the opportunities to cover/review ALL films. AWIT was an example. And that is the point of the whole speech. She can find the opinion of a black movie critic...she doesn't say they don't exist...she actually quotes the percentage of how many are black. The study showed that the gender and racial make-up of those that review/interview is far from representative of the population/movie going audience.
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 9, 2019 14:00:53 GMT
"The 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing."? You mean - "I'm not interested in the opinions of 40 year old white dudes." She said it, she meant it and it's out there. Nobody can take it back. No she said "I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color." Despite saying she doesn't hate white dudes throughout the speech, let's resort to your faux psychology She is interested in the opinion of those other than "white dudes"...what's wrong with that. The speech was not about wanting to hear only what the target audience had to say, but that women and people of colour were not given the opportunities to cover/review ALL films. AWIT was an example. And that is the point of the whole speech. She can find the opinion of a black movie critic...she doesn't say they don't exist...she actually quotes the percentage of how many are black. The study showed that the gender and racial make-up of those that review/interview is far from representative of the population/movie going audience. Have you ever considered that black dudes don't want to be movie critics? Where is the evidence that supports the theory there are thousands and thousands of black dudes being overlooked for positions as movie critics, purely based on their color? Where is the evidence that women of color weren't given an opportunity to cover/review AWiT? Maybe all media outets need to walk about LA, pressganging colored people into becoming movie reviewers 'cause Brie Larson said so. Instead of the King's shilling, maybe they can use a Capain Wamen badge at the bottom of their cup of Starbucks?
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 14:03:44 GMT
No she said "I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color." Despite saying she doesn't hate white dudes throughout the speech, let's resort to your faux psychology She is interested in the opinion of those other than "white dudes"...what's wrong with that. The speech was not about wanting to hear only what the target audience had to say, but that women and people of colour were not given the opportunities to cover/review ALL films. AWIT was an example. And that is the point of the whole speech. She can find the opinion of a black movie critic...she doesn't say they don't exist...she actually quotes the percentage of how many are black. The study showed that the gender and racial make-up of those that review/interview is far from representative of the population/movie going audience. Have you ever considered that black dudes don't want to be movie critics? Where is the evidence that supports the theory that there are thousands and thousands of black dudes being overlooked for positions as movie critics, purely based on their color? Where is the evidence that women of color weren't given an opportunity to cover/review AWiT? Maybe all media outets need to walk about LA, pressganging colored people into becoming movie reviewers 'cause Brie Larson said so. Instead of the King's shilling, maybe they can use a Capain Wamen badge at the botton of their cup of Starbucks? The study she was quoting actually had interviews with people in the business that felt that they were overlooked or were not given first refusal on the more high profile jobs. Her issue is not with the "white dudes" but with the industry
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 9, 2019 14:14:01 GMT
Have you ever considered that black dudes don't want to be movie critics? Where is the evidence that supports the theory that there are thousands and thousands of black dudes being overlooked for positions as movie critics, purely based on their color? Where is the evidence that women of color weren't given an opportunity to cover/review AWiT? Maybe all media outets need to walk about LA, pressganging colored people into becoming movie reviewers 'cause Brie Larson said so. Instead of the King's shilling, maybe they can use a Capain Wamen badge at the botton of their cup of Starbucks? The study she was quoting actually had interviews with people in the business that felt that they were overlooked or were not given first refusal on the more high profile jobs. Her issue is not with the "white dudes" but with the industry That isn't proof. Didn't Leslie Jones once attempt to label Netflix as racist/sexist because she wasn't offered the same money for her comedy special as Chris Rock and Amy Schumer?
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 14:30:01 GMT
The study she was quoting actually had interviews with people in the business that felt that they were overlooked or were not given first refusal on the more high profile jobs. Her issue is not with the "white dudes" but with the industry That isn't proof. Didn't Leslie Jones once attempt to label Netflix as racist/sexist because she wasn't offered the same money for her comedy special as Chris Rock and Amy Schumer? It's more solid than your assumption
|
|
NormanClature
Junior Member
"Anyone would think tin-pot-dictatorship is a bad thing???!?"
@armyofone
Posts: 2,108
Likes: 1,196
|
Post by NormanClature on Mar 9, 2019 14:54:20 GMT
Have you ever considered that black dudes don't want to be movie critics? Where is the evidence that supports the theory that there are thousands and thousands of black dudes being overlooked for positions as movie critics, purely based on their color? Where is the evidence that women of color weren't given an opportunity to cover/review AWiT? Maybe all media outets need to walk about LA, pressganging colored people into becoming movie reviewers 'cause Brie Larson said so. Instead of the King's shilling, maybe they can use a Capain Wamen badge at the botton of their cup of Starbucks? The study she was quoting actually had interviews with people in the business that felt that they were overlooked or were not given first refusal on the more high profile jobs. Her issue is not with the "white dudes" but with the industry
And she clearly has issues with men, that's why she is a horrible bitch to a number of them.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 9, 2019 19:46:47 GMT
You're right, I won't watch it AGAIN. Once was sufficient. Are you going to tell me that she didn't say the first sentence of my previous post now? Yeah..she said the 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing...and someone oversensitive and already with agenda would take that away and come to your conclusion. But choosing to ignore the rest of the speach explaining why she said that. What is wrong with wanting the more opinions of someone a film was made for. She didn't say white dudes shouldn't review that film...she said she wanted to hear the opinion of its aimed audience, and that audience should be more represented British critic Barry Norman was the most powerful and famous in the country. He openly hated horror films. Never gave them good reviews. Said he wasn't that kind of films audience. Hence I never sought his opinion or review when a horror film was released. I sought the opinions of the "audience" the film was aimed at. If an actor or actress said "This film was made for white people so only white people have the right to criricize this film and non-white people aren't allowed to crticize this film, that would be racist. And what Brie Larson said is just as racist.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 9, 2019 19:48:48 GMT
Have you ever considered that black dudes don't want to be movie critics? Where is the evidence that supports the theory that there are thousands and thousands of black dudes being overlooked for positions as movie critics, purely based on their color? Where is the evidence that women of color weren't given an opportunity to cover/review AWiT? Maybe all media outets need to walk about LA, pressganging colored people into becoming movie reviewers 'cause Brie Larson said so. Instead of the King's shilling, maybe they can use a Capain Wamen badge at the botton of their cup of Starbucks? The study she was quoting actually had interviews with people in the business that felt that they were overlooked or were not given first refusal on the more high profile jobs. Her issue is not with the "white dudes" but with the industry Brie Larson wants the industry to implement racial quotas. That sounds pretty racist.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 19:49:48 GMT
Yeah..she said the 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing...and someone oversensitive and already with agenda would take that away and come to your conclusion. But choosing to ignore the rest of the speach explaining why she said that. What is wrong with wanting the more opinions of someone a film was made for. She didn't say white dudes shouldn't review that film...she said she wanted to hear the opinion of its aimed audience, and that audience should be more represented British critic Barry Norman was the most powerful and famous in the country. He openly hated horror films. Never gave them good reviews. Said he wasn't that kind of films audience. Hence I never sought his opinion or review when a horror film was released. I sought the opinions of the "audience" the film was aimed at. If an actor or actress said "This film was made for white people so only white people have the right to criricize this film and non-white people aren't allowed to crticize this film, that would be racist. And what Brie Larson said is just as racist. Except she didn't say anything like that. So wind your neck in
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 9, 2019 19:53:13 GMT
If an actor or actress said "This film was made for white people so only white people have the right to criricize this film and non-white people aren't allowed to crticize this film, that would be racist. And what Brie Larson said is just as racist. Except she didn't say anything like that. So wind your neck in She did say that. She specifically called out white men and said she didn't want their review of the film.
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 19:54:38 GMT
Except she didn't say anything like that. So wind your neck in She did say that. She specifically called out white men and said she didn't want their review of the film. No she didn't. Look at the speech. Stop wasting everyones time fucktard
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 9, 2019 19:56:23 GMT
Yeah..she said the 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing...and someone oversensitive and already with agenda would take that away and come to your conclusion. But choosing to ignore the rest of the speach explaining why she said that. What is wrong with wanting the more opinions of someone a film was made for. She didn't say white dudes shouldn't review that film...she said she wanted to hear the opinion of its aimed audience, and that audience should be more represented British critic Barry Norman was the most powerful and famous in the country. He openly hated horror films. Never gave them good reviews. Said he wasn't that kind of films audience. Hence I never sought his opinion or review when a horror film was released. I sought the opinions of the "audience" the film was aimed at. "The 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing."? You mean - "I'm not interested in the opinions of 40 year old white dudes." She said it, she meant it and it's out there. Nobody can take it back. Her general behavior demonstrates that she hates "white dudes." Her father left when she was a teenager and she has clearly had a big problem with that ever since. Anyone who thinks AWiT was ONLY made for black people is out of their mind. It cost a fortune to make. It was intended for EVERYONE. The fact that it's a piece SJW agenda riddled shit, disliked by both critics and audiences, is no reason to decide you are ONLY intertested in the opinion of black people. And if she wants to read the opinion of a black movie critic because she thinks there is more chance of reading something whch reflects her own biased opinion then there are many many options. Yep, those were her own words. She specifically said she didn't want white men reviewing the movie, which sounds pretty racist. sostie seems to be in denial, but Larson did make that comment.
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Mar 9, 2019 19:58:33 GMT
She asked for more people of colour to be reviewers that is not the same as saying lets banned all white men.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Mar 9, 2019 20:00:45 GMT
"The 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing."? You mean - "I'm not interested in the opinions of 40 year old white dudes." She said it, she meant it and it's out there. Nobody can take it back. No she said "I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color." Despite saying she doesn't hate white dudes throughout the speech, let's resort to your faux psychology She is interested in the opinion of those other than "white dudes"...what's wrong with that. The speech was not about wanting to hear only what the target audience had to say, but that women and people of colour were not given the opportunities to cover/review ALL films. AWIT was an example. And that is the point of the whole speech. She can find the opinion of a black movie critic...she doesn't say they don't exist...she actually quotes the percentage of how many are black. The study showed that the gender and racial make-up of those that review/interview is far from representative of the population/movie going audience. So you admjt Larson said the movie wasn't made for white people (i.e. white people aren't allowed to watch or review the movie because it's not made for them). That's as racist as an actor or actress saying "This movie was made for white people so only white people can watch and review this movie."
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Mar 9, 2019 20:04:15 GMT
"The 40 year old white dude and Wrinkle In Time thing."? You mean - "I'm not interested in the opinions of 40 year old white dudes." She said it, she meant it and it's out there. Nobody can take it back. Her general behavior demonstrates that she hates "white dudes." Her father left when she was a teenager and she has clearly had a big problem with that ever since. Anyone who thinks AWiT was ONLY made for black people is out of their mind. It cost a fortune to make. It was intended for EVERYONE. The fact that it's a piece SJW agenda riddled shit, disliked by both critics and audiences, is no reason to decide you are ONLY intertested in the opinion of black people. And if she wants to read the opinion of a black movie critic because she thinks there is more chance of reading something whch reflects her own biased opinion then there are many many options. Yep, those were her own words. She specifically said she didn't want white men reviewing the movie, which sounds pretty racist. sostie seems to be in denial, but Larson did make that comment. Watch the fucking speech. If you have YOU are in denial. If you haven't you have nothing to say on the matter. It's there to be seen...what are you scared of? Though the chances are if you see it you won't change your mind. Your comprehension plotlines, math and grammar in the past is severely lacking so I'm not expecting to be surprised. I wouldn't expect anything less from a stubborn, hypocritical MCU hater
|
|