|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:06:53 GMT
So, anyone mind if I “liveblog” the first episode? It (and only it) is available for free on YouTube, and as I’m not going to buy the CBS version of Netflix the rest of the show is on, it’s probably the only episode I’m going to be seeing. OK. So, so far (I’m 3 min. into it) it seems like a pretty straightforward modern TV show—nothing really TZ-esque. An unfunny comedian is failing to make anyone laugh, but he’s got such an ego that he doesn’t mind that. So…why exactly did he go into comedy?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:11:22 GMT
He’s meeting an apparently famous comedian—which is a bit like “A Game of Pool” in the original, I guess. But it’s shot poorly—all modern close-ups and over-the-shoulder shots. Pretty bland so far.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:12:47 GMT
The problem is, he’s such a dummy with his politicking and philosophizing (“you choose comedy because of demonstrating life!”) that it’s difficult to feel bad for him.
Doesn’t any and every comedian know to change up his material when the material isn’t getting a single laugh? It’s simply unbelievable that he doesn’t do that.
Also: do we really need the “f-word” so often? (That’s a rhetorical question. The answer is “no.”) Is the point to show how cool and edgy the writers are? It’s really stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:21:23 GMT
“A man who refuses to compromise his beliefs for a cheap joke,” says our narrator. But he’s a—wait for it—a comedian! Sorry, not getting over this fact.
OK, producer-narrator Jordan Peele. He’s sorta-kinda doing a Serling impression—at least, I think he is, I don’t know what he usually sounds like—in the sense that every word is clipped and formal. And the Serling-esque ’60s suit is a nice touch. But his voice just isn’t very powerful, as Serling’s was: there’s not a trace of irony to Serling’s stentorian tones, which sound like a documentary narrator. Also, Peele, like narrators Charles Aidman, Robin Ward, and Forest Whitaker before him, isn’t writing any episode of the series, which makes him feel somewhat pointless, shoehorned in to play the Serling role.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:24:06 GMT
The redone opening sequence (with, thank God, Marius Constant’s original music) is very good indeed.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:25:30 GMT
No one talks this way.
Does anyone who writes dialogue actually know what real human conversation sounds like?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:27:33 GMT
His new jokes aren’t that much funnier than his old “routine.” The gimmick is apparently that everything he jokes about disappears from existence. Who wants to guess the last thing to disappear will be the Second Amendment?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:33:56 GMT
5 years and he hasn’t changed his jokes in all that time!? OK, sorry I keep harping on that.
This guy “Dave” looks a lot like Bradley Whitford in Peele’s Get Out (which I still haven’t seen).
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:38:29 GMT
All of this is filler that Serling and CBS producers would have ruthlessly cut.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:42:46 GMT
The script needed an extensive rewrite.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 22:57:57 GMT
This is a slog. The friend’s super annoying. The lead’s annoying. The girlfriend’s annoying. The most likeable character was the nephew, who vanished in the first few minutes.
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 2, 2019 23:15:32 GMT
It was pretty much awful—incredibly boring and unlikeable. The best parts were the opening credits and Jordan Peele’s narration. Even the premise is flawed: we needed a more direct connection between someone’s vanishing from existence and the cause—a painter’s getting rid of a figure in his painting, for instance. “Making a joke about someone causes that person to disappear” makes little sense. There’s no explanation for the Mephistophelean great comedian (is he dead? Who knows?), and have I mentioned the whole thing is boring? Extremely.
Someone in the YouTube comments section mentioned it seemed like “Squirrel Jokes,” an episode of the children’s show SpongeBob Squarepants (except used for horror rather than comedy, of course). The commenter was right, but “Squirrel Jokes,” a kids’ cartoon, is an infinitely more intelligent and inventive fifteen minutes than this episode’s entire hour. But why?
At least the last shot, with an inexplicable reference to The Shining, looks nice.
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on Apr 6, 2019 2:25:33 GMT
So Salzmank is it really safe to say this " re-boot of TZ " deserves " the boot " ?
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on Apr 6, 2019 2:59:38 GMT
So Salzmank is it really safe to say this " re-boot of TZ " deserves " the boot " ? Just aBOOT! To be clear, I haven’t seen (and probably won’t be seeing, as I don’t want to pay) the other episodes, which are just supposed to be better. But that first episode had pretty much nothing to appeal to us as TZ fans and, sad to say, nothing that was really any good at all (except Mr. Peele’s Rod Serling impersonation).
|
|
|
Post by mszanadu on Apr 6, 2019 3:41:51 GMT
So Salzmank is it really safe to say this " re-boot of TZ " deserves " the boot " ? Just aBOOT! To be clear, I haven’t seen (and probably won’t be seeing, as I don’t want to pay) the other episodes, which are just supposed to be better. But that first episode had pretty much nothing to appeal to us as TZ fans and, sad to say, nothing that was really any good at all (except Mr. Peele’s Rod Serling impersonation).
Definitely get your meaning here Salzmank .
I so agree here and it also doesn't seem worth it
if we can't just simply watch it ( for free ? )
on the TV Channel CBS .
IMPO - It seems such a waste of time
putting that whole production together
just so certain folks ( like me here ) won't ever get to view it
but only just hear about it .
Also streaming TV programs to me just doesn't make
any logical sense - I tend to be very old school on this too .
I'm glad to read here that actor Jordan Peele seemed as good as Rod Serling also .
Thanks so much for the heads up on this new show too .
|
|