|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Apr 18, 2019 14:56:23 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Apr 18, 2019 15:02:27 GMT
I don't understand the need for this. The Child's Play series is on the right track again with the most recent two movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Apr 18, 2019 15:06:01 GMT
I don't understand the need for this. The Child's Play series is on the right track again with the most recent two movies. Well now it looks like it's back on the wrong track.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Apr 18, 2019 15:11:44 GMT
I don't understand the need for this. The Child's Play series is on the right track again with the most recent two movies. It was until they decided to do television. The original series is continuing its storyline on there. As for this trailer, I enjoyed it. I don’t like the fact that they’re using him as this telekinetic robot that can alter other objects, but it looks like gruesome fun. Plus Hamill sounded almost exactly like Brad in the final line! |
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Apr 18, 2019 16:42:17 GMT
I prefer Chucky being posessed by a killer's spirit than an AI having the powers of Carrie.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Apr 18, 2019 18:36:08 GMT
So they got Mark Hamill just so he could do a Bead Dourif impression?
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Apr 18, 2019 23:53:21 GMT
 I wonder how long until EVERY movie is either a remake or a sequel.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Apr 19, 2019 0:21:50 GMT
What was the point of hiring Mark Hamil if he isn't going to do his Joker voice? I think that's what everyone was expecting.
|
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Apr 19, 2019 0:22:19 GMT
I wonder how long until EVERY movie is either a remake or a sequel. It pretty much feels that way now.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Apr 19, 2019 0:30:21 GMT
I wonder how long until EVERY movie is either a remake or a sequel. Certainly when it comes to mainstream cinema.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Apr 19, 2019 0:35:05 GMT
I actually like the fact that they got Mark Hamill to do the voice of Chucky in this New Movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Apr 19, 2019 0:41:06 GMT
Stephen King's Pet Sematary is a masterpiece.
The 1989 movie isn't very good, though it isn't bad either imo.
With the 2019 movie they managed to screw up their chance to make a good adaptation and somehow managed to stray even further from the novel, according to what I have read anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Apr 19, 2019 0:41:10 GMT
I don't like that they're getting rid of the supernatural elements, this is basically the plot to a Simpsons "Treehouse of Horror" episode.
|
|
|
|
Post by gbone on Apr 19, 2019 14:11:42 GMT
I have no problem with smart technology turning against people. But Chucky without Charley Lee Ray doesn’t seem right. The name Chucky is because of Charles.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 19, 2019 16:53:37 GMT
Meh.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Apr 19, 2019 19:16:18 GMT
Stephen King's Pet Sematary is a masterpiece. The 1989 movie isn't very good, though it isn't bad either imo. With the 2019 movie they managed to screw up their chance to make a good adaptation and somehow managed to stray even further from the novel, according to what I have read anyway. As of today, There are only 2 Stephen King Movies that I myself would love to see be remade....." SILVER BULLET" (I Love the Original Gary Busey Movie) and " SALEM's LOT" (The TNT Remake was Terrible).
|
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Apr 19, 2019 19:57:47 GMT
Stephen King's Pet Sematary is a masterpiece. The 1989 movie isn't very good, though it isn't bad either imo. With the 2019 movie they managed to screw up their chance to make a good adaptation and somehow managed to stray even further from the novel, according to what I have read anyway. Just about every critic and people I know who have seen the movie state that the remake is better.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Apr 19, 2019 22:43:05 GMT
Stephen King's Pet Sematary is a masterpiece. The 1989 movie isn't very good, though it isn't bad either imo. With the 2019 movie they managed to screw up their chance to make a good adaptation and somehow managed to stray even further from the novel, according to what I have read anyway. You missed my point.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Apr 19, 2019 22:49:03 GMT
Stephen King's Pet Sematary is a masterpiece. The 1989 movie isn't very good, though it isn't bad either imo. With the 2019 movie they managed to screw up their chance to make a good adaptation and somehow managed to stray even further from the novel, according to what I have read anyway. As of today, There are only 2 Stephen King Movies that I myself would love to see be remade....."SILVER BULLET" (I Love the Original Gary Busey Movie). You love the original and you still want a remake? I don't understand.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 20, 2019 0:23:24 GMT
I have no problem with smart technology turning against people. But Chucky without Charley Lee Ray doesn’t seem right. The name Chucky is because of Charles. That's where I am with it. This isn't Chucky, it's something else entirely. Taking the human element out makes him less creepy IMO. |
|
