|
|
Post by politicidal on May 11, 2019 0:19:00 GMT
First time I heard of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 11, 2019 23:02:57 GMT
First time I heard of it.
Nope. |
|
|
|
Post by femalefan on May 11, 2019 23:15:32 GMT
It's the first time I've heard of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nalkarj on May 13, 2019 13:17:46 GMT
Yes. Shakespeare was actually Mary, Queen of Scots. If you rearrange the letters in “Mary, Queen of Scots” and make some perfectly reasonable substitutions and deletions, you’ll get “Shakespeare.” This is incontrovertible evidence.
She was also Jack the Ripper, D.B. Cooper, and the Zodiac Killer, by the way.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 15, 2019 18:26:22 GMT
Yes. Shakespeare was actually Mary, Queen of Scots. If you rearrange the letters in “Mary, Queen of Scots” and make some perfectly reasonable substitutions and deletions, you’ll get “Shakespeare.” This is incontrovertible evidence. She was also Jack the Ripper, D.B. Cooper, and the Zodiac Killer, by the way.  i knew it!.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 15, 2019 18:29:08 GMT
First time I heard of it.
in all seriousness the problem here is, just because an writer knows how to write characters of a certain means he must be? Harper Lee wrote Atticus Finch and Hemingway was known for writing complex female characters within In Our Time, were they the opposite genders?its sort of silly logic the writer is using.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 15, 2019 18:32:24 GMT
Yes. Shakespeare was actually Mary, Queen of Scots. If you rearrange the letters in “Mary, Queen of Scots” and make some perfectly reasonable substitutions and deletions, you’ll get “Shakespeare.” This is incontrovertible evidence. She was also Jack the Ripper, D.B. Cooper, and the Zodiac Killer, by the way. I presume you find the conspiracies actually silly.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on May 16, 2019 15:01:09 GMT
First they change male characters to female characters in movies and now they are trying to change actual historical men to women.
its beyond moronic.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 16, 2019 15:30:38 GMT
First they change male characters to female characters in movies and now they are trying to change actual historical men to women. its beyond moronic. Perhaps. This at least seems like an extreme fringe theory.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 16, 2019 18:19:31 GMT
First they change male characters to female characters in movies and now they are trying to change actual historical men to women. its beyond moronic. Perhaps. This at least seems like an extreme fringe theory. true, with some basis.
|
|
|
|
Post by MCDemuth on Jun 1, 2019 17:45:41 GMT
Perhaps. This at least seems like an extreme fringe theory.Like... Jesus Christ was actually Zeus? I highly doubt this one... But it is a very entertaining read... I guess from now on, some people, when they hear this discussion in "Die Hard: With a Vengeance" (1995), they will just think it has some hidden meaning, like something from the "Divinci Code"... Zeus : Why you keep calling me Jésus? I look Puerto Rican to you?John McClane : Guy back there called you Jésus.Zeus : He didn't say Jésus. He said, "Hey, Zeus!" My name is Zeus.John McClane : Zeus?Zeus : Yeah, Zeus! As in, father of Apollo? Mt. Olympus? Don't fuck with me or I'll shove a lightning bolt up your ass? Zeus! You got a problem with that?John McClane : No, I don't have a problem with that.Maybe if someone can prove that Jesus Christ was " shoving lightning bolts up people's asses"... I might think differently. LOL! Next Theory, Please...
|
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jun 2, 2019 3:31:17 GMT
I have heard about that theory and also "his" plays were written by Elizabeth I.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jun 2, 2019 7:48:11 GMT
his plays were written by bernie taupin.
|
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Jun 6, 2019 17:49:02 GMT
I think Goethe, Marlowe, and a few others like Chaucer were women too, but I dont have the proof yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jun 6, 2019 18:17:04 GMT
If u think he is just a retard, understand he is one of the top astronauts Understood. |
|
|
|
Post by louise on Jul 15, 2019 19:04:12 GMT
It seems pretty weak to me. Shakespeare's name is on the plays, his portrait is in the First Folio, that's good enough for me. Attempts to argue that someone else wrote them seem quite futile. As for the argument that he must have been a woman because he wrote good female characters, that is absurd. Does the author of this article really think he didn't write good male characters as well?
|
|
