|
Post by heeeeey on May 13, 2019 17:23:43 GMT
The 'establishment' scientists don't accept anything they can't explain, and simply dismiss it or lie. They lie whether it's about the age of the human species, or about the 'non-existence' of an ethereal field.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on May 13, 2019 18:09:11 GMT
The 'establishment' scientists don't accept anything they can't explain, and simply dismiss it or lie. They lie whether it's about the age of the human species, or about the 'non-existence' of an ethereal field. More bullshit from butthurt losers who can't do good work in their chosen fields and choose instead to believe complete bullshit. . .linked to by one of our local butthurt losers who doesn't understand squat about any subject, and liked by another butthurt loser who also doesn't understand squat about any subject. Nice.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on May 13, 2019 18:14:58 GMT
So then how old do you believe the human race is then if you think scientists are lying and what evidence do you have? I don't think very many scientists would claim the "non-existance" of an ethereal field (unsfalsifiable hypothesis), but rather there's no actual evidence for it.
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on May 13, 2019 18:37:12 GMT
A Hare Krishna is stating this crap. Anyone who believes this dumb shit, from this dumb fuck, is themself a dumb fucking shit.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 13, 2019 18:51:36 GMT
A Hare Krishna is stating this crap. Anyone who believes this dumb shit, from this dumb fuck, is themself a dumb fucking shit.
Look up the term "anomalous artifact" sometime. You think these guys are objective? You think they're dedicated to uncovering the truth? They're not.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on May 13, 2019 19:21:00 GMT
You think these guys are objective? You think they're dedicated to uncovering the truth? They're not. Yes, they are dedicated to uncovering the truth. Just as fuckwit hicks like you are dedicated to avoiding the truth in favor of the dumbest fantasies imaginable.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on May 13, 2019 19:21:21 GMT
Could There Be a 140 Million Year Old Hammer? by kareldekar anwar_textile@yahoo.com' April 13, 2015 Hammers are a popular tool in homes and on construction sites up and down the country. Today you can choose from a cheap and simple hammer for everyday tasks through to indestructible handle hammers, such as sledgehammers. However, the first hammers were much more basic than these and generally consisted of a wooden handle attached to a piece of stone. In the 1930s a hammer was discovered in rocks dating back 140 million years. Is this the earliest hammer ever found or could there be another explanation for the discovery?
140 Million Year Old Hammer 140 Million Year Old Hammer Image Credit The discovery of a 140 million year old hammer
The ferrous hammer was found in 1934 by Max Hahn in Texas. Originally, Hahn believed that the rock had a bit of a stick protruding out of it. It wasn’t split in two for over 10 years and it was at this point that the hammer was found to be inside the rock. This exposed the 15cm long hammer, which had a handle made from wood. Over the years encased in the rock, the hammer had undergone partial petrifaction.
Surveys that have been carried out on the section of rocks where the discovery was made dated them to the lower cretaceous period. This was a period in time over 140 million years ago, during the age of the dinosaurs. Most scientists believe that it was highly unlikely that this hammer could have actually been made at this time and that there is likely to be a logical reason why the hammer became encased in the rocks.
Dating the hammer
Experts are undecided as to the actual age of the hammer. Some believe that it can be no more than 700 years old, due to the nature of the materials. One possible explanation is that it became deposited in the rock face just a few hundred years ago. Further tests would need to be carried out in order to completely clarify the age. However, the hammer is now owned by a private creation scientist, who doesn’t want to conduct further dating tests.
Before the hammer went into private hands, a number of tests were carried out on it. These showed that it was of good strength and made to a high quality. The hammer itself had been protected from rust by the iron oxide layer. Tests conducted in 1989 show that it was likely to have been made prior to the modern Iron Age, due to the presence of sulphur and chlorine in the item. Today’s hammers, available from sources such as Redashe ltd, would not contain such additives.
The explanation of how the hammer came to be deposited in rocks from the lower cretaceous period is not straightforward. However, there are other artefacts that have also been discovered amongst geological layers that pre-date the existence of the particular items or where there is no logical explanation for them.
However old this hammer turns out to be, it is certainly a prime example of how early man manufactured the tools he needed to survive. It also shows how the instruments we use today still have similarities with those first tools.
Post Views: 908
I want to hire that carpenter!
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 13, 2019 19:23:28 GMT
You think these guys are objective? You think they're dedicated to uncovering the truth? They're not. Yes, they are dedicated to uncovering the truth. Just as fuckwit hicks like you are dedicated to avoiding the truth in favor of the dumbest fantasies imaginable. More like dedicated to covering the truth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2019 19:29:45 GMT
Could There Be a 140 Million Year Old Hammer? by kareldekar anwar_textile@yahoo.com' April 13, 2015 Hammers are a popular tool in homes and on construction sites up and down the country. Today you can choose from a cheap and simple hammer for everyday tasks through to indestructible handle hammers, such as sledgehammers. However, the first hammers were much more basic than these and generally consisted of a wooden handle attached to a piece of stone. In the 1930s a hammer was discovered in rocks dating back 140 million years. Is this the earliest hammer ever found or could there be another explanation for the discovery? 140 Million Year Old Hammer 140 Million Year Old Hammer Image Credit The discovery of a 140 million year old hammer The ferrous hammer was found in 1934 by Max Hahn in Texas. Originally, Hahn believed that the rock had a bit of a stick protruding out of it. It wasn’t split in two for over 10 years and it was at this point that the hammer was found to be inside the rock. This exposed the 15cm long hammer, which had a handle made from wood. Over the years encased in the rock, the hammer had undergone partial petrifaction. Surveys that have been carried out on the section of rocks where the discovery was made dated them to the lower cretaceous period. This was a period in time over 140 million years ago, during the age of the dinosaurs. Most scientists believe that it was highly unlikely that this hammer could have actually been made at this time and that there is likely to be a logical reason why the hammer became encased in the rocks. Dating the hammer Experts are undecided as to the actual age of the hammer. Some believe that it can be no more than 700 years old, due to the nature of the materials. One possible explanation is that it became deposited in the rock face just a few hundred years ago. Further tests would need to be carried out in order to completely clarify the age. However, the hammer is now owned by a private creation scientist, who doesn’t want to conduct further dating tests. Before the hammer went into private hands, a number of tests were carried out on it. These showed that it was of good strength and made to a high quality. The hammer itself had been protected from rust by the iron oxide layer. Tests conducted in 1989 show that it was likely to have been made prior to the modern Iron Age, due to the presence of sulphur and chlorine in the item. Today’s hammers, available from sources such as Redashe ltd, would not contain such additives. The explanation of how the hammer came to be deposited in rocks from the lower cretaceous period is not straightforward. However, there are other artefacts that have also been discovered amongst geological layers that pre-date the existence of the particular items or where there is no logical explanation for them. However old this hammer turns out to be, it is certainly a prime example of how early man manufactured the tools he needed to survive. It also shows how the instruments we use today still have similarities with those first tools. Post Views: 908 I want to hire that carpenter!No... only a gullible numbskull with no knowledge of archaeology or geological processes would believe the 'London Hammer' nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on May 13, 2019 19:32:17 GMT
Yes, they are dedicated to uncovering the truth. Just as fuckwit hicks like you are dedicated to avoiding the truth in favor of the dumbest fantasies imaginable. More like dedicated to covering the truth. You wouldn't know or understand the truth if it bit you on your brainless ass.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 13, 2019 19:33:11 GMT
Could There Be a 140 Million Year Old Hammer? by kareldekar anwar_textile@yahoo.com' April 13, 2015 Hammers are a popular tool in homes and on construction sites up and down the country. Today you can choose from a cheap and simple hammer for everyday tasks through to indestructible handle hammers, such as sledgehammers. However, the first hammers were much more basic than these and generally consisted of a wooden handle attached to a piece of stone. In the 1930s a hammer was discovered in rocks dating back 140 million years. Is this the earliest hammer ever found or could there be another explanation for the discovery? 140 Million Year Old Hammer 140 Million Year Old Hammer Image Credit The discovery of a 140 million year old hammer The ferrous hammer was found in 1934 by Max Hahn in Texas. Originally, Hahn believed that the rock had a bit of a stick protruding out of it. It wasn’t split in two for over 10 years and it was at this point that the hammer was found to be inside the rock. This exposed the 15cm long hammer, which had a handle made from wood. Over the years encased in the rock, the hammer had undergone partial petrifaction. Surveys that have been carried out on the section of rocks where the discovery was made dated them to the lower cretaceous period. This was a period in time over 140 million years ago, during the age of the dinosaurs. Most scientists believe that it was highly unlikely that this hammer could have actually been made at this time and that there is likely to be a logical reason why the hammer became encased in the rocks. Dating the hammer Experts are undecided as to the actual age of the hammer. Some believe that it can be no more than 700 years old, due to the nature of the materials. One possible explanation is that it became deposited in the rock face just a few hundred years ago. Further tests would need to be carried out in order to completely clarify the age. However, the hammer is now owned by a private creation scientist, who doesn’t want to conduct further dating tests. Before the hammer went into private hands, a number of tests were carried out on it. These showed that it was of good strength and made to a high quality. The hammer itself had been protected from rust by the iron oxide layer. Tests conducted in 1989 show that it was likely to have been made prior to the modern Iron Age, due to the presence of sulphur and chlorine in the item. Today’s hammers, available from sources such as Redashe ltd, would not contain such additives. The explanation of how the hammer came to be deposited in rocks from the lower cretaceous period is not straightforward. However, there are other artefacts that have also been discovered amongst geological layers that pre-date the existence of the particular items or where there is no logical explanation for them. However old this hammer turns out to be, it is certainly a prime example of how early man manufactured the tools he needed to survive. It also shows how the instruments we use today still have similarities with those first tools. Post Views: 908 I want to hire that carpenter!No... only a gullible numbskull with no knowledge of archaeology or geological processes would believe the 'London Hammer' nonsense. Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 13, 2019 19:35:08 GMT
No... only a gullible numbskull with no knowledge of archaeology or geological processes would believe the 'London Hammer' nonsense. Only a Sith deals in absolutes. You don't believe that London Hammer crap do you... Please say you aren't completely gullible?
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on May 13, 2019 19:36:02 GMT
Ned Kelly
Seems to be that I have a moron who is incapable of understanding sarcasm, answering this post.
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on May 13, 2019 20:20:42 GMT
More like dedicated to covering the truth. You wouldn't know or understand the truth if it bit you on your brainless ass. So basically he's smarter'n you.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 14, 2019 8:49:58 GMT
Only a Sith deals in absolutes. You don't believe that London Hammer crap do you... Please say you aren't completely gullible? I don't remember ever hearing of it before. Maybe I did and forgot. Anyhow, methinks thou dost protest too much.
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on May 14, 2019 11:47:17 GMT
You don't believe that London Hammer crap do you... Please say you aren't completely gullible? This idiot thinks that Nibiru is a real thing and that jets are spraying mind controlling substances to control the population. He's about as gullible an idiot as you are ever likely to encounter in your entire life. He actively seeks out the dumbest bullshit and takes it seriously while rejecting anything that actually has serious, verifiable evidence behind it.
|
|
|
Post by Zos on May 14, 2019 11:56:33 GMT
Sometimes I despair of the stupidity of people and the things they post on this board.
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on May 14, 2019 14:44:34 GMT
You're totally correct. There's absolutely no objectivity from modern scientists (at least since 1974, when I began college). Academia Science ensures no one who is objective continues past the first four years of Science. That's still better than Arts Academia, where blind adherence to mob mentality begins immediately. Still, it's a pattern of human ignorance that has made the modern world one in which ironically the ignorant masses are now in charge of every field, including Science.
Proof of this is in the ignorant masses, who worship the modern day preachers with degrees in various avenues of Science, all of whom want to believe they can know everything so much that they lack any objectivity in the Unknown.
Arthur Conan Doyle is chiefly to blame, whether he meant to be or not. These individuals are all convinced that they are behaving like Sherlock Holmes, by concocting deductions they consider are proven, flailing about in the Unknown, applying whatever archaeological digs
Consider carbon dating. It's a modern development that the modern day ignorant masses insist work for billions of years, which for starters insists on the most self righteous notion that the laws of Physics have been stable for a billion times the amount of time we've used them in experimentation. That's like going into a store that sells nothing but Amati violins and deducing that there are a jillion Amati violins in the country alone, and no other types of violins, and that no one else ever made a violin.
The self righteousness of these ignorant masses is incredible, and impossible to explain in natural terms.
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on May 14, 2019 15:25:34 GMT
No... only a gullible numbskull with no knowledge of archaeology or geological processes would believe the 'London Hammer' nonsense. Only a Sith deals in absolutes.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 14, 2019 16:02:33 GMT
*Archaeologist*. The video even spells it out for you. Come on now!
|
|