|
|
Post by OpiateOfTheMasses on May 15, 2019 13:58:46 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48275795Oops... my mistake. They're doing it again. Been raped by your poppy and are now carrying his kid? Tough - God demands that you give birth to his child! Cos that's how God shows his love... (Obviously once you've given birth we won't help you with any of the cost or anything like that!)
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on May 15, 2019 14:52:24 GMT
Hey, hey, hey, hey, that's Mississippi you're talking about.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on May 15, 2019 17:14:10 GMT
Most religious don’t live in Alabama.
On top of that there are plenty of religious folk down there who are having their rights suppressed to kill the prekid if they so choose.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 15, 2019 17:41:05 GMT
Weak. 2/10.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 15, 2019 17:53:48 GMT
Don't you live in Alabama? Or not now? Do you agree with the new changes in the law?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 15, 2019 17:58:46 GMT
Don't you live in Alabama? Or not now? Do you agree with the new changes in the law? Yes, I still live there, and I'm not familiar with the particulars of the law yet, but since the ungodly hate it when babies make it out of the womb alive I gather from this board and the Politics board that they are very unhappy about the changes in the law.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 15, 2019 22:01:20 GMT
Don't you live in Alabama? Or not now? Do you agree with the new changes in the law? Yes, I still live there, and I'm not familiar with the particulars of the law yet, but since the ungodly hate it when babies make it out of the womb alive I gather from this board and the Politics board that they are very unhappy about the changes in the law. Would you like if any non-Christian or non-theist religious group imposed their laws on you?
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on May 15, 2019 22:40:15 GMT
Yes, I still live there, and I'm not familiar with the particulars of the law yet, but since the ungodly hate it when babies make it out of the womb alive I gather from this board and the Politics board that they are very unhappy about the changes in the law. Would you like if any non-Christian or non-theist religious group imposed their laws on you? Secular laws can do that. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 16, 2019 9:01:02 GMT
Yes, I still live there, and I'm not familiar with the particulars of the law yet, but since the ungodly hate it when babies make it out of the womb alive I gather from this board and the Politics board that they are very unhappy about the changes in the law. Would you like if any non-Christian or non-theist religious group imposed their laws on you? For instance?
|
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on May 16, 2019 10:49:38 GMT
In cases of rape... it's obviously a bad situation, but your still killing a innocent child through abortion at the end of the day (so it's still wrong to abort). that child still has half the mother in him/her to. two wrongs(rape/abortion), don't make a right. CoolJGS☺It's not a pre-kid as life begins at conception. those who don't respect life at it's most innocent stage (i.e. in a mother womb) will tend to find life disposable in other areas to (i.e euthanasia etc) and that's not good for society in general. once you cross that line, it's that much easier to cross many other lines that should not be crossed. plus, while the left always mentions 'rights', they forget about the child's right-to-life. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on May 16, 2019 11:13:56 GMT
In cases of rape... it's obviously a bad situation, but your still killing a innocent child through abortion at the end of the day (so it's still wrong to abort). that child still has half the mother in him/her to. two wrongs(rape/abortion), don't make a right. CoolJGS☺ It's not a pre-kid as life begins at conception. those who don't respect life at it's most innocent stage (i.e. in a mother womb) will tend to find life disposable in other areas to (i.e euthanasia etc) and that's not good for society in general. once you cross that line, it's that much easier to cross many other lines that should not be crossed. plus, while the left always mentions 'rights', they forget about the child's right-to-life. Meh, abortion debates as a "when life starts" matter is stupid to pursue. However, what makes you think a prekid isn't alive? Abortion being legal has nothing to do with when a prekid is alive or not as science determines that not the law. Let's assume abortion being legal allows you to kill a prekid and life begins at conception. Women want them anyway (After all, it doesn't have a cute face yet...) and people like the ones in Alabama truly suck at explaining the reason not to get them. Hint: A bunch of old white dudes passing a law is not the best way... I think abortions are truly horrible things that accomplish nothing noble advocates say it does and pretends to elevate people who do stupid things to some kind of mythical hero status for actually being scared of their stupid decisions. Abortion IS NOT about rape victims, dying moms, or population control, but about people having stupid sex without any protection whatsoever and then becoming surprised by the outcome of that idiotic decision. Despite the truly evil, despicable, and horrendous action of abortion, banning it is not the way you get rid of it and the pregnant lady, her boyfriend/husband/Tinder Date, or doctor can't be entirely responsible for thinking abortions are an awesome thing considering how it's championed. If abortion is largely a bunch of people irrationally thinking their life is over if they have a kid, then why on earth would someone be stupid enough to think a law will prevent them from attaining one anyway. The only way to end abortion is to end demand for it and a law passing has rarely if ever done that.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on May 16, 2019 17:09:07 GMT
I dunno the details, but doesn't that technically violate Roe vs Wade? Or did they find some loophole around that? Something like this should probably be taken to the Supreme Court.
|
|
|
|
Post by Cody™ on May 16, 2019 17:14:50 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48275795Oops... my mistake. They're doing it again. Been raped by your poppy and are now carrying his kid? Tough - God demands that you give birth to his child! Cos that's how God shows his love... (Obviously once you've given birth we won't help you with any of the cost or anything like that!) Yes because punishing the child for it’s father’s crime is the moral course of action... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2019 17:17:45 GMT
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-48275795Oops... my mistake. They're doing it again. Been raped by your poppy and are now carrying his kid? Tough - God demands that you give birth to his child! Cos that's how God shows his love... (Obviously once you've given birth we won't help you with any of the cost or anything like that!) Yes because punishing the child for it’s father’s crime is the moral course of action... No woman should ever, and I mean ever, be forced to carry a rapist's child. You sick fuck ☹️ |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on May 16, 2019 18:42:34 GMT
I dunno the details, but doesn't that technically violate Roe vs Wade? Or did they find some loophole around that? Something like this should probably be taken to the Supreme Court. Thats the plan. They know the bill is strict but they are hoping a more conservative SCOTUS simply overturns RvW it opens the easy for something less restrictive than this law but more restrictive than the past. It likely won’t make it past appeals and if SC takes it rather than dismissing it, it may be bad news. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 16, 2019 23:39:40 GMT
heir Would you like if any non-Christian or non-theist religious group imposed their laws on you? For instance? For instance we have already discussed a twilight zone episode in which people are stopped by state from practicing their religion. Sure you can do so in hiding but mostly only 1 generation of a given population can do so in hiding and even among those who do so can't fully follow their religion. The point here is that anti-abortion laws are being enforced on all and not just on Christians. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 17, 2019 4:20:08 GMT
In cases of rape... it's obviously a bad situation, but your still killing a innocent child through abortion at the end of the day (so it's still wrong to abort). that child still has half the mother in him/her to. two wrongs(rape/abortion), don't make a right. CoolJGS☺ It's not a pre-kid as life begins at conception. those who don't respect life at it's most innocent stage (i.e. in a mother womb) will tend to find life disposable in other areas to (i.e euthanasia etc) and that's not good for society in general. once you cross that line, it's that much easier to cross many other lines that should not be crossed. plus, while the left always mentions 'rights', they forget about the child's right-to-life. If there were ever an example of the complete religious fucking retard...
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 17, 2019 8:42:03 GMT
heir For instance we have already discussed a twilight zone episode in which people are stopped by state from practicing their religion. Sure you can do so in hiding but mostly only 1 generation of a given population can do so in hiding and even among those who do so can't fully follow their religion. The point here is that anti-abortion laws are being enforced on all and not just on Christians. Just a twilight zone episode of something hypothetical?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 17, 2019 10:50:41 GMT
heir For instance we have already discussed a twilight zone episode in which people are stopped by state from practicing their religion. Sure you can do so in hiding but mostly only 1 generation of a given population can do so in hiding and even among those who do so can't fully follow their religion. The point here is that anti-abortion laws are being enforced on all and not just on Christians. Just a twilight zone episode of something hypotheticala China is a close example in the real life and I have often seen you panicked about them.
|
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on May 17, 2019 11:55:42 GMT
They dare to force protecting the most helpless humans. They dare to defy the right to choose to kill the most helpless humans.
Law is a statement of morality. If you don't want to have any morality established, then you want Anarchy, absolutely no law. Except some of you still want law, your own vigilante law to serve Satan or demonic forces, which means those of you who do so are so mentally challenged that you think demons will reward you.
Fine. Lets not have any laws. Oh, you want laws when they're convenient for you?
All law is enforcing a morality. Which morality do you choose?
I'm certainly more comfortable with people who choose a morality of protecting the helpless than those who force a morality of killing humans when it is convenient. If the latter is the case, then why have a Fire Department to save people from fires? Why even look for people who are missing in the Grand Canyon? Why even bother having hospitals?
|
|
