|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jul 11, 2019 20:38:45 GMT
Probably Spider-Man 3 as it felt a bigger letdown when compared to the previous films.
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Jul 11, 2019 20:46:33 GMT
Amazing Spider-Man 2 was worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by sostie on Jul 11, 2019 20:54:59 GMT
Spider-Man 3 is a massive cluster fuck. A shame because Thomas Haden Church/Sandman was great
|
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Jul 11, 2019 21:04:06 GMT
I think Spider-Man 3 is the worse of the two.
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Jul 11, 2019 21:22:10 GMT
2 by a wide margin
EDIT: Thought this was about which one was best. I have changed to the only correct response.
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Jul 11, 2019 21:40:57 GMT
Spider-Man 3 is a massive cluster fuck. A shame because Thomas Haden Church/Sandman was great Mary Jane is also insufferable. No wonder Peter tries to nail Gwen Stacy. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 11, 2019 22:10:53 GMT
The Amazing Spider-Man 2. At the least, Spider-Man 3 had a clear beginning, middle, and end. And Sandman (THC) remains a more compelling villain than all three (or is it four counting Felicity Jones?) in TAS2.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Jul 11, 2019 22:41:38 GMT
Spider-Man 3 is better.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingkoopa on Jul 11, 2019 23:30:19 GMT
Spider-Man 3 (edit: thought it was the better of the two)
Church as Sandman was a standout.
I always liked Maguire as Peter Parker. Couldn't buy Andrew Garfield's Parker for one second, and Parker has always been much more interesting to me than Spider-Man. Andrew Garfield played his Peter Parker a little too close to Flash Thompson for me. He's a good actor I enjoy seeing, but I just couldn't get into him as Peter Parker.
They let Sam Raimi get a little weird, which while I didn't like all of it, I liked some of it...and that it was something a little different at least.
On the cons side, the butler scene was unforgivably dumb. While I get having to sacrifice certain plot points (in a movie with so many characters), this was sooo lazy. I saw this in the theatres and remember the groan. I wanted to see what the butler was talking about more than a swing number with Parker being a dick. Then again, I did like that they let Sam Raimi operate on a longer leash, so beggars can't be choosers I suppose.
Apart from Martin Sheen and Sally Field, the rebooted two movies did nothing for me. Jamie Foxx had his moments, but his character didn't get the development it deserved IMHO. Garfield was a good Spider-man, but a Peter Parker you wouldn't imagine gets bullied at school. Both of the "Amazing" movies seemed rushed at the expense of the characters...which despite some hamminess, Maguire/Raimi seemed more in tune with.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Jul 11, 2019 23:32:12 GMT
Probably Spider-Man 3 as it felt a bigger letdown when compared to the previous films. interestingly both feature Sideways actors.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Jul 12, 2019 2:13:14 GMT
Spider-Man 3 is fun when it’s bad.
TASM2 is just bad.
|
|
|
|
Post by darksidebeadle on Jul 12, 2019 3:24:27 GMT
ASM2 - 6/10
SM3 -- 3/10
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Jul 12, 2019 18:32:33 GMT
They're both so god awful that its really hard to say.
But I guess I'll say Spider-Man 3 because of how good parts 1 and 2 were. How could they drop the ball so hard after that? And its budget was outrageous!
But then Amazing Spider-Man 2 went and pretty much made the same mistakes! Too many villains, all of them corny and miscast (Rhino?! WTF was that?!); weak story; no clear vision. Which is too bad because I actually liked Amazing Spider-Man 1 and thought it was a nice setup for the rest of the franchise.
|
|
|
|
Post by anthonyrocks on Jul 18, 2019 13:10:50 GMT
Probably Spider-Man 3 as it felt a bigger letdown when compared to the previous films. Agreed!
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 18, 2019 14:07:36 GMT
Amazing Spider-Man 2 is worse. I actually love SM3 and find it to be entertaining.
|
|
