|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 13, 2017 17:47:11 GMT
tpfkar Lepper was an intelligent, coherent, steady guy.  I have to wonder why you even bother arguing with these dead filthy zombies.He was an annoying jackass, but compared to what came after him I suppose yes, he was an intelligent, coherent, steady guy. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on Apr 13, 2017 17:49:33 GMT
tpfkar That was definitely the reason you found him annoying.  You haven't proven it's the moon yet, you filthy vile scumbag. |
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 13, 2017 18:09:20 GMT
I am not obligated to answer questions from faggots. Yeah, I'm not a "faggot". You don't answer anyone's questions, which makes it weird that you spend years on a discussion board/s, unable to even simply discuss things. So, why did you think that post should have been brought to an admin's attention as potentially unacceptable? Do you see the irony in both making things up, and name calling? You know, the two accusations about you that you thought might be unacceptable? Erjen.. Always ready to call someone a 'faggot' while complaining about other peoples behavior. |
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 13, 2017 18:25:56 GMT
What's even more amazing is that some defenders of that statement claim that Hitler was humane (I guess they're saying) because he didn't use it on enemy troops.
Just on unarmed women and children in his domain.
Yep. It reminds me of what a History teacher once told the class about world leaders. "If you tell a lie, tell a whopper of a lie, something unbelievable, and it will stun the public and be accepted".
That aside, the fact is that Trump did this. I wouldn't have done it, but I'm more on the lines of Obama. However, since our country made a strike, I'm not going to be a traitor and take sides against it. Right now Trump is just an aggressive leader who made a power play to enrich later bluffs. Since I wouldn't have made the strike (probably not), I would be called on a "bluff" later. Now Trump has the world thinking he wouldn't hesitate to push the button.
That's the defense. Not saying it's good or bad, but it's probably the correct thing to do. Me, I go more for doing the right thing, which is why I'm not there I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by Edward-Elizabeth-Hitler on Apr 13, 2017 18:30:29 GMT
Hitler used it on a grand scale to kill people in gas chambers ErJen. You did know that right, or are you now a Holocaust denier as well? I think it is pretty obvious from what ErJen said, not to mention the link he posted, that he does not deny gas chambers, much less the Holocaust. I have no idea why you thought otherwise. To be blunt, I considered the possibility because it's ErJen. He's shown himself to be anti Semitic before and believes in every single conspiracy theory going, no matter how ridiculous. Plus he appeared to be deflecting towards defending Spicer's comments. |
|
|
|
Post by drystyx on Apr 13, 2017 19:01:58 GMT
I think it is pretty obvious from what ErJen said, not to mention the link he posted, that he does not deny gas chambers, much less the Holocaust. I have no idea why you thought otherwise. To be blunt, I considered the possibility because it's ErJen. He's shown himself to be anti Semitic before and believes in every single conspiracy theory going, no matter how ridiculous. Plus he appeared to be deflecting towards defending Spicer's comments. I've never seen anything anti semitic about Erjen. I'm pretty sure he's a Christian, and no Christian is against Jews. Can't be done. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 19:13:17 GMT
To be blunt, I considered the possibility because it's ErJen. He's shown himself to be anti Semitic before and believes in every single conspiracy theory going, no matter how ridiculous. Plus he appeared to be deflecting towards defending Spicer's comments. I've never seen anything anti semitic about Erjen. I'm pretty sure he's a Christian, and no Christian is against Jews. Can't be done. Then you have not been looking: |
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Apr 13, 2017 19:16:34 GMT
I've never seen anything anti semitic about Erjen. I'm pretty sure he's a Christian, and no Christian is against Jews. Can't be done. Then you have not been looking: He'll be talking about True Christians shortly. |
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Apr 13, 2017 19:32:47 GMT
If only Hitler and the Syrian President could blow people up with the Mother of All Bombs, then there would be true peace and security.  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 0:47:51 GMT
To be blunt, I considered the possibility because it's ErJen. He's shown himself to be anti Semitic before and believes in every single conspiracy theory going, no matter how ridiculous. Plus he appeared to be deflecting towards defending Spicer's comments. I've never seen anything anti semitic about Erjen. I'm pretty sure he's a Christian, and no Christian is against Jews. Can't be done. Well, there's a stunning level of ignorance of history on display right there. |
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Apr 14, 2017 12:01:45 GMT
To be blunt, I considered the possibility because it's ErJen. He's shown himself to be anti Semitic before and believes in every single conspiracy theory going, no matter how ridiculous. Plus he appeared to be deflecting towards defending Spicer's comments. I've never seen anything anti semitic about Erjen. I'm pretty sure he's a Christian, and no Christian is against Jews. Can't be done. |
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Apr 14, 2017 12:04:28 GMT
I've never seen anything anti semitic about Erjen. I'm pretty sure he's a Christian, and no Christian is against Jews. Can't be done. Then you have not been looking: Nothing remotely anti-semitic about that first quoted paragraph. Not really about the second, either, though there is a hint of distrust there. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 14, 2017 16:25:53 GMT
To be blunt, I considered the possibility because it's ErJen. He's shown himself to be anti Semitic before and believes in every single conspiracy theory going, no matter how ridiculous. Plus he appeared to be deflecting towards defending Spicer's comments. I've never seen anything anti semitic about Erjen. I'm pretty sure he's a Christian, and no Christian is against Jews. Can't be done. Thanks, drystyx. "Anti-Semitic" is simply another term like "homophobic" and "anti-intellectual" which is used to demonize opponents of the progressive agenda. The Israelis are not a Semitic people, and I am calling BS on the Third Temple prophecy. Nothing against the Jews, but I'm not Jewish, and I'm not falling for this phony globalist and Satanic prophecy. Looks as if Karl Askel has jumped on the "anti-Semitic" bandwagon too. Good for him. The more the merrier, but don't you think it kind of strange that complete nonbelievers who insist that the Old Testament is fictional will try so hard to convince us that the Israelis are the direct descendants of those fictional personalities in the Old Testament? I think it's very strange. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 14, 2017 16:35:48 GMT
Then you have not been looking: Nothing remotely anti-semitic about that first quoted paragraph. Not really about the second, either, though there is a hint of distrust there. Hey, asswipe. I repeat the question to you. What could they have done about it? What could you have done about it if you had been there? EDIT -- Sorry, the above comment was meant for Superdud, but as to the hint of distrust from the second quote that he thought important enough to save, I'd be interesting in hearing about it sometime. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 16:37:37 GMT
I think it's very imaginary, since nobody here has tried to do any such thing. |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on Apr 14, 2017 16:44:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Karl Aksel on Apr 14, 2017 22:52:49 GMT
Nothing remotely anti-semitic about that first quoted paragraph. Not really about the second, either, though there is a hint of distrust there. Hey, asswipe. I repeat the question to you. What could they have done about it? What could you have done about it if you had been there? EDIT -- Sorry, the above comment was meant for Superdud, but as to the hint of distrust from the second quote that he thought important enough to save, I'd be interesting in hearing about it sometime. It's this "I knew a couple of Jews once, and they were alright, but..." thing. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 14, 2017 23:47:56 GMT
Hey, asswipe. I repeat the question to you. What could they have done about it? What could you have done about it if you had been there? EDIT -- Sorry, the above comment was meant for Superdud, but as to the hint of distrust from the second quote that he thought important enough to save, I'd be interesting in hearing about it sometime. It's this "I knew a couple of Jews once, and they were alright, but..." thing. I regret that it was so disturbing for you. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2017 0:44:01 GMT
It's this "I knew a couple of Jews once, and they were alright, but..." thing. I regret that it was so disturbing for you. Some people are sensitive to mass murder. You wouldn't understand. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 15, 2017 0:55:45 GMT
I regret that it was so disturbing for you. Some people are sensitive to mass murder. You wouldn't understand. Mass murder has nothing to do with what I said. The United Nations wants the earth's population down from seven billion people to half a billion by the year 2030. That's only thirteen years away. How do you think they are going to accomplish it, except by mass murder? |
|
