|
|
Post by darkpast on Aug 4, 2019 2:48:28 GMT
the rest suck
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 7, 2019 21:48:01 GMT
Nah, Fast & Furious 6 to Hobbs & Shaw are good too.
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperDevilDoctor on Aug 13, 2019 6:29:03 GMT
FIVE is the best of the franchise, true... and at best I’d rate it 5/10.
These movies are insultingly stupid. Brain-dead garbage.
|
|
|
|
Post by mslo79 on Aug 27, 2019 14:37:15 GMT
I like them all, although only the 1st one stands out from the pack...
1.The Fast and the Furious (2001) - 7/10
2.Furious Seven (2015) - 6-6.5/10
3.Fast & Furious (2009)
4.Fast & Furious 6 (2013)
5.2 Fast 2 Furious (2003) - 6/10
6.Fast Five (2011)
7.The Fate of the Furious (2017)
8.The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift (2006) - 5.5-6/10
or another thing I can say... this series easily tops the vast majority of blockbusters nowadays as there is not a single super hero type of movie that can top this series.
|
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 28, 2019 16:15:14 GMT
FIVE is the best of the franchise, true... and at best I’d rate it 5/10. These movies are insultingly stupid. Brain-dead garbage. Just food for thought, but many people labeled pulp magazines featuring the likes of CONAN, DOC SAVAGE, JOHN CARTER OF MARS, TARZAN, THE LONE RANGER, THE SHADOW, BUCK ROGERS, BRAK MAK MORN, DOMINO LADY, FLASH GORDON, SOLOMON KANE, and ZORRO the very same exact way when they made it to the stands in the early 1900s but are now labeled as actually solid entertainments and classics. No, the Fast and the Furious is by no means Grade A cinema as far as the basic essentials are concerned but they entertain pretty much the same way, mostly on surface value, as these pulp magazines had done for the youth of then. Just making the comparison because most times we happened to cross paths pulp era novellas and heroes are often in topic.
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperDevilDoctor on Aug 28, 2019 19:02:41 GMT
FIVE is the best of the franchise, true... and at best I’d rate it 5/10. These movies are insultingly stupid. Brain-dead garbage. Just food for thought, but many people labeled pulp magazines featuring the likes of CONAN, DOC SAVAGE, JOHN CARTER OF MARS, TARZAN, THE LONE RANGER, THE SHADOW, BUCK ROGERS, BRAK MAK MORN, DOMINO LADY, FLASH GORDON, SOLOMON KANE, and ZORRO the very same exact way when they made it to the stands in the early 1900s but are now labeled as actually solid entertainments and classics. No, the Fast and the Furious is by no means Grade A cinema as far as the basic essentials are concerned but they entertain pretty much the same way, mostly on surface value, as these pulp magazines had done for the youth of then. Just making the comparison because most times we happened to cross paths pulp era novellas and heroes are often in topic. Have to respectfully disagree about the classic pulps of the 1930s... In most cases, the fantastical feats performed by the heroes of those books/stories were given at least some kind of supernatural, fantasy, or science fiction-based reasoning for their "possibility". The characters in the F&F franchise are not supermen (or women). They're not imbued with metahuman powers. They are not superheroes. I don't want to see James Bond restraining a helicopter from flying away just using his arm.
|
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Aug 29, 2019 1:24:24 GMT
Just food for thought, but many people labeled pulp magazines featuring the likes of CONAN, DOC SAVAGE, JOHN CARTER OF MARS, TARZAN, THE LONE RANGER, THE SHADOW, BUCK ROGERS, BRAK MAK MORN, DOMINO LADY, FLASH GORDON, SOLOMON KANE, and ZORRO the very same exact way when they made it to the stands in the early 1900s but are now labeled as actually solid entertainments and classics. No, the Fast and the Furious is by no means Grade A cinema as far as the basic essentials are concerned but they entertain pretty much the same way, mostly on surface value, as these pulp magazines had done for the youth of then. Just making the comparison because most times we happened to cross paths pulp era novellas and heroes are often in topic. Have to respectfully disagree about the classic pulps of the 1930s... In most cases, the fantastical feats performed by the heroes of those books/stories were given at least some kind of supernatural, fantasy, or science fiction-based reasoning for their "possibility". The characters in the F&F franchise are not supermen (or women). They're not imbued with metahuman powers. They are not superheroes. I don't want to see James Bond restraining a helicopter from flying away just using his arm. Yes, that is very true, however the F&F franchise accomplishes what the classic pulps of the 1930s had done for the target audience in its time today; escapist action/adventure and particularly shy of appealing to the most basic of eye or brain candy.
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Sept 12, 2019 7:44:28 GMT
I like them all except for part 3.
|
|
Jan El Señor
Junior Member
I love everyone.
@janelsenor
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 1,247
|
Post by Jan El Señor on Sept 28, 2019 16:49:07 GMT
If all the fans of this franchise suddenly dropped dead, the collective IQ of the planet would jump up a good 50 points....
|
|
