|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 24, 2019 2:46:44 GMT
In all honesty, I disagree with your theory that Steve managed to rewrite the prime timeline by marrying Peggy Carter. It contradicts the rule laid by Bruce that traveling back to the past doesn't change the future, but that it creates an alternate timeline. When Steve traveled back to 1945, he created yet another alternate timeline and skipped back to the present. The use of the quantum pad is irrelevant. Steve and Tony time-traveled from alternate 2012 to 1970 without a quantum pad. It's more so the use of the time GPS watch that Tony built that navigates where you wants to go when you time travel. Let me reiterate what I said before. The MCU we have been watching is not the original timeline. The MCU we have been watching is an alternate timeline that Steve created by going back and marrying Peggy. And I don't mean the Steve we have been watching. The original Steve most likely saw that Peggy wasn't married. He then created an alternate timeline. Our Steve went back to the 70s and saw that he was married to Peggy which gave him the idea to go back and marry Peggy. Now, whenever a Steve goes back and marries Peggy he creates a time loop unless he changes something other than what the previous Steve changed. So if the Steve we have been watching doesn't change a thing, he will stay in the timeline he was in before. So, no, it doesn't contradict the rules laid out by Banner. Also, the Russos said that Steve created an alternate timeline. I did say that.
Yes, they traveled to the past without the pad. But when they came back to the anchor point timeline they landed on the pad. That Steve had to travel back in time to be on that bench. You can't travel to the future with that form of time travel. You can only open a doorway to the past or bring something through with you. And if that Steve is from an alternate timeline, he can't go back to the one he was just in. The device he was using is anchored to this timeline. He'd just land on the pad a couple minutes ago. Which they will see. And then there will be two old Steves...
The Russos said that Steve lived out his life with Peggy in an alternate timeline, and that he returned to the main timeline to give Sam his shield.
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Aug 24, 2019 3:12:13 GMT
In all honesty, I disagree with your theory that Steve managed to rewrite the prime timeline by marrying Peggy Carter. It contradicts the rule laid by Bruce that traveling back to the past doesn't change the future, but that it creates an alternate timeline. When Steve traveled back to 1945, he created yet another alternate timeline and skipped back to the present. The use of the quantum pad is irrelevant. Steve and Tony time-traveled from alternate 2012 to 1970 without a quantum pad. It's more so the use of the time GPS watch that Tony built that navigates where you wants to go when you time travel. Let me reiterate what I said before. The MCU we have been watching is not the original timeline. The MCU we have been watching is an alternate timeline that Steve created by going back and marrying Peggy. And I don't mean the Steve we have been watching. The original Steve most likely saw that Peggy wasn't married. He then created an alternate timeline. Our Steve went back to the 70s and saw that he was married to Peggy which gave him the idea to go back and marry Peggy. Now, whenever a Steve goes back and marries Peggy he creates a time loop unless he changes something other than what the previous Steve changed. So if the Steve we have been watching doesn't change a thing, he will stay in the timeline he was in before. So, no, it doesn't contradict the rules laid out by Banner. Also, the Russos said that Steve created an alternate timeline. I did say that. Yes, they traveled to the past without the pad. But when they came back to the anchor point timeline they landed on the pad. That Steve had to travel back in time to be on that bench. You can't travel to the future with that form of time travel. You can only open a doorway to the past or bring something through with you. And if that Steve is from an alternate timeline, he can't go back to the one he was just in. The device he was using is anchored to this timeline. He'd just land on the pad a couple minutes ago. Which they will see. And then there will be two old Steves...
Okay, I get what you were saying now. Your theory seems to play out like this picture.
|
|
thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Aug 24, 2019 7:48:13 GMT
You know Endgame's time travel sucking is a common viewed opinion. If I was DC- fan, I would have told you how Flashpoint did it better but thanks for the reminder.
Flashpoint's time travel is as bad as the one in Days of Future Past. Superman is older than the Flash. How does Flash going back in time, to when he is a pre-teen, cause baby Kal El's ship to land in a different place? Same with Days of Future Past causing everyone to be born before the time travel happened. Days of Future Past's time travel even has a woman with no psychic powers being able to send a person's mind back in time to their younger body. Tell me how that makes sense?
Endgame's time travel is the most straight forward of all time travels. No curves at all. The part that people get confused on is old Steve sitting on the bench and not knowing that he went back in time and changed nothing. People think that old Steve went back in time and changed things by marrying Peggy causing another timeline. When, in fact, the MCU we have been watching the entire time is not the 1st timeline, but a splinter one that Steve created by going back in time and marrying Peggy. If current Steve created a splinter timeline and lived there, he would have had to use the quantum pad to return to this timeline. They were watching the pad and would have seen old Steve return. But he didn't return to the pad. They saw him on the bench. Meaning that he lived out his life in the MCU timeline we were watching since Iron Man. Simple and straight forward.
Flashpoint and Days of Future Past did it better with less potholes. Did you notice they don't get as much complaints as Endgame? Days of Future Past did not cause everyone to be born but supposedly created a new timeline for everyone born after 1973, creating an alternate reality, This is similar to star trek 2009 after Spock goes back in time before Kirk is born. Wolverine wakes up in 2023, Only Wolverine, Mystique, Magneto and Xavier remember the old events as they were born in the 50s. Wolverine only remembering because he was the time traveler. You are reminding me too much of Dazz. The dude was just misquoting the movie to defend Endgame's shortcomings. You are no different. Its shameful MCU fans, you guys act like this.
In DOFP the time travel was present through out the film, it was very important in the main climax, Endgame introduced it fast and got rid of it fast unlike DOFP that kept it constant. In Flash Point it was introduced at the last minute , perhaps the emotional core of the movie. Endgame used it in the most cliche way, it was used only in one arc of the movie and it worked smoothly in that arc. The story was too simply done in endgame, they should never have brought everyone back that quickly to fight thanos. it's the worst cliche use of time travel.
Did we really need to see that after infifnty war? this was just another excuse for avengers to have another meaningless large cgi battle that makes no sense anymore in their movies. DOFP was smart enough to avoid that generic superhero stuff. What was brilliant about DOFP was, the mutants could not win simply by fighting and killing the sentinels. I really got bored with another Avengers big massive fight, it has not been as interesting as when they fought Loki in Avengers 1.
Flash Point was smarter with the story too, the heroes still lost in the end every much like DOFP to Endgame where Wanda can now beat up Thanos. Magneto could hardly kill one sentinel. Superman could hardly kill Amazons. But everyone can beat up Thanos now all back from the dead.
Flash was lucky to be spared so he was the last surviving JL Member that goes back to stop himself from saving his mum in the last few minutes of the film. What was disappointing about Endgame is nobody write the simple sort of time travel story anymore. It was too childish even for a Disney.
DOFP use of time travel was based on soft science fiction, Psychics traveling trough time, You could as well try to call Harry Potter bad because of a time turner. We have not discovered actual wormholes in the universe like interstellar or endgame as much as we have not discovered people with psychics powers. Have we seen anything go faster than light like the flash? Many movies have different tools for time traveling , that is why its called fiction or fantasy. it's the execution of time travel that matters. Endgame is not just poorly done but the most cliche used.
The story could easily have gone more space court drama, something DOFP at least had with Xavier, Mystique and Magneto. Give Thanos a chance to redeem himself like Mystique got, since like Mystique he was not supposed to be a one dimensional villain in Infinity War. Endgame could have brought everyone at the end of the film not in the second act of the film but only after the 6 main core avengers duked it out and had a complicated clash of argument about the fallout from infifnty war and no fat Thor. That is what Engdame needed to evolve as a superhero story not the same old massive big cgi battle that solves all their problems after the quick poor use of time travel.
Its been covered already, I think we all agree the worst part of the movie is the time travel story and fat thor.
Not even the Russos can explain it. You are contradicting them, meaning its actually as bad as we think.
|
|
thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Aug 24, 2019 7:59:38 GMT
Flashpoint's time travel is as bad as the one in Days of Future Past. Superman is older than the Flash. How does Flash going back in time, to when he is a pre-teen, cause baby Kal El's ship to land in a different place? Same with Days of Future Past causing everyone to be born before the time travel happened. Days of Future Past's time travel even has a woman with no psychic powers being able to send a person's mind back in time to their younger body. Tell me how that makes sense?
Endgame's time travel is the most straight forward of all time travels. No curves at all. The part that people get confused on is old Steve sitting on the bench and not knowing that he went back in time and changed nothing. People think that old Steve went back in time and changed things by marrying Peggy causing another timeline. When, in fact, the MCU we have been watching the entire time is not the 1st timeline, but a splinter one that Steve created by going back in time and marrying Peggy. If current Steve created a splinter timeline and lived there, he would have had to use the quantum pad to return to this timeline. They were watching the pad and would have seen old Steve return. But he didn't return to the pad. They saw him on the bench. Meaning that he lived out his life in the MCU timeline we were watching since Iron Man. Simple and straight forward.
In the case of Flashpoint, it was stated that traveling through time created a fracture in reality, which was supposed to be how it changed events that occurred before the event the Flash travelled back to. Not exactly a great explanation, but better than nothing. Mind you, I didn’t care much for the movie, or the comic it was based on. That is true about flashpoint. I am disappointed to see MCU fans kicking other movies because Endgame sucked in the concept. Old Steve was a bad idea but I understand why they did it. Marvel is not ready to let Chris Evans fully retire, they came up with old steve and still kept young steve in the 50s, that was done incase marvel wanted to use steve again in future movies. Good for marvel but bad for Endgame's story.
MCU fans are not willing to face Endgame's time travel is poorly done. I already said even the Russos could not explain it.
|
|
thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Aug 24, 2019 8:07:29 GMT
Who’s voting “no,” lmao? Time travel is literally the only reason this movie is possible the way it is. Without time travel this would be a completely different movie (and probably a better one). Quoted for hard truth.
The people voting no are the people who don't want to admit it was poorly done. I have heard how crazy mcu fans can be but this is a step too far. if they can't even admit it's a time travel movie. They should just be a good sports about it like comedy fans, who would admit hot tube time machine is a time travel movie and a funny one too. they don't say its not a time travel movie just because its a comedy.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Aug 24, 2019 8:19:16 GMT
I think "Prime" is meant to indicate a starting point for them. Like if the outcome starting from Steve becoming Captain America is the same every time, that is the prime timeline. But then you have them go back in time and change things, then you create other timelines off of that. I mean, Strange said there saw over 14 million timelines in the fight against Thanos 1. That might only be because of what they did when they traveled through time and not something they randomly did without time travel.
Strange said he saw 14 million scenarios iiirc, scenarios is different to timelines, million timelines could result in the same scenario due to how tediously different they are, when you think there are 7+ billion people on the planet each person making hundreds of choices each every day, just looking into every possible future timeline for tomorrow if you consider only earth as a factor you are talking about hundreds of billions even trillions of potential timelines, let alone 5 years with an entire universe of over trillions of beings, so his 14 million only works if we are talking scenarios.
And again a prime timeline infers limited numbers of universes and potential scenarios, Strange wasn't using a computer simulation in which anything he wanted could be added or taken away and any feasible outcome played out, Strange saw actual possible futures because he was using the time stone if things were set he wouldn't be able to do this imo, which negates the possibility of a prime timeline.
I did say in the fight against Thanos. I don't think he was talking about just the fight on Titan or up to Wakanda, but the whole fight against him.
Unless Strange was the one pushing those timelines to see the results.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Aug 24, 2019 8:24:01 GMT
Let me reiterate what I said before. The MCU we have been watching is not the original timeline. The MCU we have been watching is an alternate timeline that Steve created by going back and marrying Peggy. And I don't mean the Steve we have been watching. The original Steve most likely saw that Peggy wasn't married. He then created an alternate timeline. Our Steve went back to the 70s and saw that he was married to Peggy which gave him the idea to go back and marry Peggy. Now, whenever a Steve goes back and marries Peggy he creates a time loop unless he changes something other than what the previous Steve changed. So if the Steve we have been watching doesn't change a thing, he will stay in the timeline he was in before. So, no, it doesn't contradict the rules laid out by Banner. Also, the Russos said that Steve created an alternate timeline. I did say that.
Yes, they traveled to the past without the pad. But when they came back to the anchor point timeline they landed on the pad. That Steve had to travel back in time to be on that bench. You can't travel to the future with that form of time travel. You can only open a doorway to the past or bring something through with you. And if that Steve is from an alternate timeline, he can't go back to the one he was just in. The device he was using is anchored to this timeline. He'd just land on the pad a couple minutes ago. Which they will see. And then there will be two old Steves...
The Russos said that Steve lived out his life with Peggy in an alternate timeline, and that he returned to the main timeline to give Sam his shield. Again, how? How would he had come to this timeline from an alternate one without the use of the anchor? If he went back in time, from a future point, he would have gone back in the alternate reality he created. The only way he can make it to his original timeline is to use the anchor and that would mean landing on the pad that they were watching.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Aug 24, 2019 8:38:58 GMT
Flashpoint's time travel is as bad as the one in Days of Future Past. Superman is older than the Flash. How does Flash going back in time, to when he is a pre-teen, cause baby Kal El's ship to land in a different place? Same with Days of Future Past causing everyone to be born before the time travel happened. Days of Future Past's time travel even has a woman with no psychic powers being able to send a person's mind back in time to their younger body. Tell me how that makes sense?
Endgame's time travel is the most straight forward of all time travels. No curves at all. The part that people get confused on is old Steve sitting on the bench and not knowing that he went back in time and changed nothing. People think that old Steve went back in time and changed things by marrying Peggy causing another timeline. When, in fact, the MCU we have been watching the entire time is not the 1st timeline, but a splinter one that Steve created by going back in time and marrying Peggy. If current Steve created a splinter timeline and lived there, he would have had to use the quantum pad to return to this timeline. They were watching the pad and would have seen old Steve return. But he didn't return to the pad. They saw him on the bench. Meaning that he lived out his life in the MCU timeline we were watching since Iron Man. Simple and straight forward.
Flashpoint and Days of Future Past did it better with less potholes. Did you notice they don't get as much complaints as Endgame? Days of Future Past did not cause everyone to be born but supposedly created a new timeline for everyone born after 1973, creating an alternate reality, This is similar to star trek 2009 after Spock goes back in time before Kirk is born. Wolverine wakes up in 2023, Only Wolverine, Mystique, Magneto and Xavier remember the old events as they were born in the 50s. Wolverine only remembering because he was the time traveler. You are reminding me too much of Dazz. The dude was just misquoting the movie to defend Endgame's shortcomings. You are no different. Its shameful MCU fans, you guys act like this.
In DOFP the time travel was present through out the film, it was very important in the main climax, Endgame introduced it fast and got rid of it fast unlike DOFP that kept it constant. In Flash Point it was introduced at the last minute , perhaps the emotional core of the movie. Endgame used it in the most cliche way, it was used only in one arc of the movie and it worked smoothly in that arc. The story was too simply done in endgame, they should never have brought everyone back that quickly to fight thanos. it's the worst cliche use of time travel.
Did we really need to see that after infifnty war? this was just another excuse for avengers to have another meaningless large cgi battle that makes no sense anymore in their movies. DOFP was smart enough to avoid that generic superhero stuff. What was brilliant about DOFP was, the mutants could not win simply by fighting and killing the sentinels. I really got bored with another Avengers big massive fight, it has not been as interesting as when they fought Loki in Avengers 1.
Flash Point was smarter with the story too, the heroes still lost in the end every much like DOFP to Endgame where Wanda can now beat up Thanos. Magneto could hardly kill one sentinel. Superman could hardly kill Amazons. But everyone can beat up Thanos now all back from the dead.
Flash was lucky to be spared so he was the last surviving JL Member that goes back to stop himself from saving his mum in the last few minutes of the film. What was disappointing about Endgame is nobody write the simple sort of time travel story anymore. It was too childish even for a Disney.
DOFP use of time travel was based on soft science fiction, Psychics traveling trough time, You could as well try to call Harry Potter bad because of a time turner. We have not discovered actual wormholes in the universe like interstellar or endgame as much as we have not discovered people with psychics powers. Have we seen anything go faster than light like the flash? Many movies have different tools for time traveling , that is why its called fiction or fantasy. it's the execution of time travel that matters. Endgame is not just poorly done but the most cliche used.
The story could easily have gone more space court drama, something DOFP at least had with Xavier, Mystique and Magneto. Give Thanos a chance to redeem himself like Mystique got, since like Mystique he was not supposed to be a one dimensional villain in Infinity War. Endgame could have brought everyone at the end of the film not in the second act of the film but only after the 6 main core avengers duked it out and had a complicated clash of argument about the fallout from infifnty war and no fat Thor. That is what Engdame needed to evolve as a superhero story not the same old massive big cgi battle that solves all their problems after the quick poor use of time travel.
Its been covered already, I think we all agree the worst part of the movie is the time travel story and fat thor.
Not even the Russos can explain it. You are contradicting them, meaning its actually as bad as we think.
Days of Future Past made it so Jubilee, Angel and Psylocke was born way earlier than they should have been. None of those characters were born before 1973. How is Jubilee at least 14 in 1983? Angel and Psylocke were in their early 20s in X3. How were they in their 20s in 1983? That's not something that can be caused by time travel 10 years prior.
And the fights in Days of Future Past and Flashpoint were meaningless. There was no winning or losing because those places were gonna get erased anyway. Those were just happenings. Like seeing a movie just before the series got canceled and rebooted. Like Justice League and Dark Phoenix. The battle at the end of Endgame had meaning. A major character died and won't be coming back as he was. That will have ramifications going forward. Iceman died. Magneto died. Colossus, Storm and a bunch of others died. But they came back in the next scene for a happy ending.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Aug 24, 2019 8:41:45 GMT
Let me reiterate what I said before. The MCU we have been watching is not the original timeline. The MCU we have been watching is an alternate timeline that Steve created by going back and marrying Peggy. And I don't mean the Steve we have been watching. The original Steve most likely saw that Peggy wasn't married. He then created an alternate timeline. Our Steve went back to the 70s and saw that he was married to Peggy which gave him the idea to go back and marry Peggy. Now, whenever a Steve goes back and marries Peggy he creates a time loop unless he changes something other than what the previous Steve changed. So if the Steve we have been watching doesn't change a thing, he will stay in the timeline he was in before. So, no, it doesn't contradict the rules laid out by Banner. Also, the Russos said that Steve created an alternate timeline. I did say that. Yes, they traveled to the past without the pad. But when they came back to the anchor point timeline they landed on the pad. That Steve had to travel back in time to be on that bench. You can't travel to the future with that form of time travel. You can only open a doorway to the past or bring something through with you. And if that Steve is from an alternate timeline, he can't go back to the one he was just in. The device he was using is anchored to this timeline. He'd just land on the pad a couple minutes ago. Which they will see. And then there will be two old Steves...
Okay, I get what you were saying now. Your theory seems to play out like this picture. Pretty much.
|
|
thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Aug 24, 2019 9:10:26 GMT
Flashpoint and Days of Future Past did it better with less potholes. Did you notice they don't get as much complaints as Endgame? Days of Future Past did not cause everyone to be born but supposedly created a new timeline for everyone born after 1973, creating an alternate reality, This is similar to star trek 2009 after Spock goes back in time before Kirk is born. Wolverine wakes up in 2023, Only Wolverine, Mystique, Magneto and Xavier remember the old events as they were born in the 50s. Wolverine only remembering because he was the time traveler. You are reminding me too much of Dazz. The dude was just misquoting the movie to defend Endgame's shortcomings. You are no different. Its shameful MCU fans, you guys act like this.
In DOFP the time travel was present through out the film, it was very important in the main climax, Endgame introduced it fast and got rid of it fast unlike DOFP that kept it constant. In Flash Point it was introduced at the last minute , perhaps the emotional core of the movie. Endgame used it in the most cliche way, it was used only in one arc of the movie and it worked smoothly in that arc. The story was too simply done in endgame, they should never have brought everyone back that quickly to fight thanos. it's the worst cliche use of time travel.
Did we really need to see that after infifnty war? this was just another excuse for avengers to have another meaningless large cgi battle that makes no sense anymore in their movies. DOFP was smart enough to avoid that generic superhero stuff. What was brilliant about DOFP was, the mutants could not win simply by fighting and killing the sentinels. I really got bored with another Avengers big massive fight, it has not been as interesting as when they fought Loki in Avengers 1.
Flash Point was smarter with the story too, the heroes still lost in the end every much like DOFP to Endgame where Wanda can now beat up Thanos. Magneto could hardly kill one sentinel. Superman could hardly kill Amazons. But everyone can beat up Thanos now all back from the dead.
Flash was lucky to be spared so he was the last surviving JL Member that goes back to stop himself from saving his mum in the last few minutes of the film. What was disappointing about Endgame is nobody write the simple sort of time travel story anymore. It was too childish even for a Disney.
DOFP use of time travel was based on soft science fiction, Psychics traveling trough time, You could as well try to call Harry Potter bad because of a time turner. We have not discovered actual wormholes in the universe like interstellar or endgame as much as we have not discovered people with psychics powers. Have we seen anything go faster than light like the flash? Many movies have different tools for time traveling , that is why its called fiction or fantasy. it's the execution of time travel that matters. Endgame is not just poorly done but the most cliche used.
The story could easily have gone more space court drama, something DOFP at least had with Xavier, Mystique and Magneto. Give Thanos a chance to redeem himself like Mystique got, since like Mystique he was not supposed to be a one dimensional villain in Infinity War. Endgame could have brought everyone at the end of the film not in the second act of the film but only after the 6 main core avengers duked it out and had a complicated clash of argument about the fallout from infifnty war and no fat Thor. That is what Engdame needed to evolve as a superhero story not the same old massive big cgi battle that solves all their problems after the quick poor use of time travel.
Its been covered already, I think we all agree the worst part of the movie is the time travel story and fat thor.
Not even the Russos can explain it. You are contradicting them, meaning its actually as bad as we think.
Days of Future Past made it so Jubilee, Angel and Psylocke was born way earlier than they should have been. None of those characters were born before 1973. How is Jubilee at least 14 in 1983? Angel and Psylocke were in their early 20s in X3. How were they in their 20s in 1983? That's not something that can be caused by time travel 10 years prior.
.
What you said about DOFP is not that bad if you use the concept of alternate realities, as I already mentioned DOFP supposedly created a brand new timeline. it wiped the slate clean. characters like jubilee, psylocke and warren did not need to be born in the year of the old timelines or be born at all. Gotenks from dragon ball was never born in the trunks alternate timeline. Dr Brown kids were never born in back to the future 1 and 2.
This was Fox actually succeeding with rebooting the series on paper but failing miserably on screen. X-Men Apocalypse and Dark Phoenix were meant to be a start of a new timeline rebooted series. You can say DOFP worked the alternate reality concept well but those movies were just terrible anyway.
DOFP time travel works suprpemly better than Endgame as a pure stand alone film of time travel. I don't know how much you know about the history of the franchise but DOFP was meant to be the end of the franchise. Mathew Vaughn who wrote the film left the series because Fox decided to rush the movie, while Vaughn wanted to wait another few years to release the film as the finality that ties the prequels and original movies together. this is why we see storm,colossus,beast, jean and cyclops all again supposedly alive.
Endgame can choose to bring iron man back if they want too,another one of my problems with the film. the time travel machine became a toy to be played it. They won't bring iron man back because RDJ has retired. frankly I think they did RDJ injustice. RDJ, as the most important character in the MCU needed a personal stand alone masterpiece like Logan to wrap his own story up but we all know Disney is not good enough to clean Logan shoes.
Ironman dying was more about RDJ retiring not about the consequences of time travel or a character won't be coming back. The one reason old steve and young 50s steve is even more controversial, since MCU plans to use Steve in the future, they could not really kill him off.
Everyone is dead again in Logan, since DOFP created an alternate reality for both logan and xmen apocalypse to still exist, the happy ending is not as sweet as it seems. the only last surviving xmen out there is X23. Xavier is gone, xmen were gone and logan is gone. that is perfect for the original xmen movies that started in 2000.
Who even takes X-Men apocalypse and dark phoenix seriously? they are even more ignored than dragon ball GT.
|
|
thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Aug 24, 2019 9:27:11 GMT
As for flashpoint, the story of time travel is less cliche than endgame. I love how both DOFP and Flashpoint dwell on the concept that the heroes could not win by simply beating up the bad guys. Making time travel even more necessary and more understanding. I was bored when I saw another big avengers battle, it has sucked since Loki did it in Avengers 1. Space court drama would have been better, Thanos snaps his fingers, brings everyone back, dies and redeems himself. this is what Endgame needed. Avengers are like uneducated Cavemens, they solve everything with fights and blows. I prefer the story telling of Mystique and Barry Flash Allen in DOFP and Flash Ppoint, who had to make personal sacrifices at the end of the movie for the heroes to win. not the heroes wining because they can easily beat up the villains that killed them before time travel brought them back to get their revenge.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Aug 24, 2019 11:01:49 GMT
As for flashpoint, the story of time travel is less cliche than endgame. I love how both DOFP and Flashpoint dwell on the concept that the heroes could not win by simply beating up the bad guys. Making time travel even more necessary and more understanding. I was bored when I saw another big avengers battle, it has sucked since Loki did it in Avengers 1. Space court drama would have been better, Thanos snaps his fingers, brings everyone back, dies and redeems himself. this is what Endgame needed. Avengers are like uneducated Cavemens, they solve everything with fights and blows. I prefer the story telling of Mystique and Barry Flash Allen in DOFP and Flash Ppoint, who had to make personal sacrifices at the end of the movie for the heroes to win. not the heroes wining because they can easily beat up the villains that killed them before time travel brought them back to get their revenge.
No it didn't and Flashpoint, atleast the film did have that, Barry had to beat Eobard so he could reconnect fully to the speedforce so he could go back to the past and let his mother die, Flashpoint simply had it where the smaller battles didn't matter, Wonder woman Vs. Aquaman doesn't matter really, it's not important beyond giving Barry the reason to put things back after that the battle between Atlantis & the Amazons only matters to provide an action packed backdrop, Endgame did do this also, Spider-Man was dogpiled and would likely have died but the fight that mattered was over the stones, Tony got them and ended everything, only issue really is they didn't show enough of other characters struggling imo, but that would also be called cliché by anyone wanting to look for negativity, that Tony saves everyone by using the stones nullifying the results of individual battles.
Also the point of Endgame was they couldn't win just by beating the bad guy, they did this in the opening 20 minutes and took Thanos's head off, didn't matter, they had to go to the extreme of time travel to fix the problem, this also playing into a a point of false praise for DOFP, THIS actually showed repercussions of time travel, Thanos killed half the universe so they went back to undo that, but that brought the ire of past alternative Thanos who then planned to destroy the universe entirely and remake it from the ground up, by time travelling to bring back those they lost they ultimately create a problem where they risked losing everything, this is a repercussion because it couldn't happen without time travel, they killed they biggest bad ass in the universe and by trying to undo his damage brought a 2nd version of him back to do more damage.
DOFP didn't do anything new, it did the same thing most X-Men movies do, they had a big action piece followed by a much more restrained final confrontation, it happened in X1, X2, Last Stand & First Class, but they still had big action stuff happening right before things slowed down a bit also Raven doesn't make a personal sacrifice, how is not murdering someone in cold blood a sacrifice? Tony however does, he knowingly and willingly gave his own life to take out Thanos and his army to protect everyone, he did it without hesitation or regret on top of that.
Complaining that an Avenger movie a movie franchise base on it being ensemble franchise of various stand alone heroes & franchises having a big battle is dumb, complaining about how they did it I could get, it being the 4th time the have ended an Avengers movie with the heroes facing yet another hoard of identical enemies is fair, or that it ended in a massive final battle featuring every character in the movie is again fair, they could have if they had done a big team battle earlier in the film ended the movie with the battle being the MCU Trinity Vs Thanos instead of army vs army, still would have had a big group fight earlier in the movie and a climatic battle to end on but it wouldn't be the same faceless CGI army Vs. the good guys for once, but that's not the complaint you are making, the one you are making is silly.
Also this is in relation to the post you made prior to this, DOFP did get flack for the timeline crap when it came out not sure about Flashpoint due to it being so much less talked about in general but DOFP was criticised for yet again the timeline of the X-Men not making sense, which was only made much worse with the sequels to it fucking things up worse, but still the fact that somehow stopping the Sentinels prevents Jean going psycho in an unrelated issue is daft, given what was wrong there at the core was her own psyche not an external threat connected to the Sentinels, yu know it would be like saying if we stopped JFK's assassination then we will prevent that shrapnel Mr McNuggets has left in him from WW2 causing him to have an aneurism.
I mean due to saying FC & X1 are explicitly in the same continuity where as previously it was stated FC was a soft reboot, and the connection could or could not match up, this brought up the issues o Raven & Xavier's relationship not being present at all in X1-Last Stand, that the story of how Magneto helped build Cerebro and that's how he knows how to protect himself from it makes no sense, nor does Xavier not knowing before hand Magneto has a helmet to protect him from Xavier, the whole cure thing was pissed on as well as Beast & Xavier now look like cunts for not divulging the miracle drug to the likes of Rogue whose powers were a major problem for them.
DOFP wasn't not pulled up for their time travel issues, but nor was it seen by as many people, Endgame made 4 times the money DOFP, it was seen by way more people, so every topic with Endgame has and will be discussed more avidly, that's just plain sense, not surprised you fail to grasp this however.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Aug 24, 2019 11:18:58 GMT
Strange said he saw 14 million scenarios iiirc, scenarios is different to timelines, million timelines could result in the same scenario due to how tediously different they are, when you think there are 7+ billion people on the planet each person making hundreds of choices each every day, just looking into every possible future timeline for tomorrow if you consider only earth as a factor you are talking about hundreds of billions even trillions of potential timelines, let alone 5 years with an entire universe of over trillions of beings, so his 14 million only works if we are talking scenarios.
And again a prime timeline infers limited numbers of universes and potential scenarios, Strange wasn't using a computer simulation in which anything he wanted could be added or taken away and any feasible outcome played out, Strange saw actual possible futures because he was using the time stone if things were set he wouldn't be able to do this imo, which negates the possibility of a prime timeline.
I did say in the fight against Thanos. I don't think he was talking about just the fight on Titan or up to Wakanda, but the whole fight against him.
Unless Strange was the one pushing those timelines to see the results.
Sorry but what are you on about?
Strange said he saw over 14 million scenarios where they fight Thanos, and only in one scenario do they win, like I said multiple timelines can result in the same scenario though.
There cannot be a prime timeline unless you live in a predetermined universe, which at best will result in a finite amount of parallel timelines, because if it's predetermined so is every choice, instead of every choice being played out or outcome played out only those predetermined branching points can exist.
Now if you were to say the MCU as we know it doesn't exist in a core or a primary timeline I can get you, as there can be infinite core/primary timelines, which are timelines unaltered via time travel, but still existing alongside various other ones where different choices were made and such.
Thing with that is that means Old Man Steve isn't our Steve, wouldn't he be the Steve from the core timeline, our Steve having lived out his life in an alternative timeline just very similar to his own? Far easier imo to assume it's simply a time loop ala Terminator.
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Aug 24, 2019 12:23:15 GMT
I did say in the fight against Thanos. I don't think he was talking about just the fight on Titan or up to Wakanda, but the whole fight against him.
Unless Strange was the one pushing those timelines to see the results.
Sorry but what are you on about?
Strange said he saw over 14 million scenarios where they fight Thanos, and only in one scenario do they win, like I said multiple timelines can result in the same scenario though.
There cannot be a prime timeline unless you live in a predetermined universe, which at best will result in a finite amount of parallel timelines, because if it's predetermined so is every choice, instead of every choice being played out or outcome played out only those predetermined branching points can exist.
Now if you were to say the MCU as we know it doesn't exist in a core or a primary timeline I can get you, as there can be infinite core/primary timelines, which are timelines unaltered via time travel, but still existing alongside various other ones where different choices were made and such.
Thing with that is that means Old Man Steve isn't our Steve, wouldn't he be the Steve from the core timeline, our Steve having lived out his life in an alternative timeline just very similar to his own? Far easier imo to assume it's simply a time loop ala Terminator.
Yes, he said that, but I don't think he was just talking about the fights in Infinity War. There could have been a scenario where Stark doesn't help build the quantum pad. Or they aren't able to get one of the stones. They get caught in the 70s. They all die in 2012.
And, as of Endgame (which has Dr. Strange parts that take place before Dr. Strange), the multiverse is created by time travel. They can have a what if show because of what they did in Endgame and Dr. Strange and possibly Infinity War. And I wouldn't say it is predetermined because you can't go to the future. You can only speed time up using the Time stone (with what has been shown).
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Aug 24, 2019 12:57:10 GMT
Sorry but what are you on about?
Strange said he saw over 14 million scenarios where they fight Thanos, and only in one scenario do they win, like I said multiple timelines can result in the same scenario though.
There cannot be a prime timeline unless you live in a predetermined universe, which at best will result in a finite amount of parallel timelines, because if it's predetermined so is every choice, instead of every choice being played out or outcome played out only those predetermined branching points can exist.
Now if you were to say the MCU as we know it doesn't exist in a core or a primary timeline I can get you, as there can be infinite core/primary timelines, which are timelines unaltered via time travel, but still existing alongside various other ones where different choices were made and such.
Thing with that is that means Old Man Steve isn't our Steve, wouldn't he be the Steve from the core timeline, our Steve having lived out his life in an alternative timeline just very similar to his own? Far easier imo to assume it's simply a time loop ala Terminator.
Yes, he said that, but I don't think he was just talking about the fights in Infinity War. There could have been a scenario where Stark doesn't help build the quantum pad. Or they aren't able to get one of the stones. They get caught in the 70s. They all die in 2012.
And, as of Endgame (which has Dr. Strange parts that take place before Dr. Strange), the multiverse is created by time travel. They can have a what if show because of what they did in Endgame and Dr. Strange and possibly Infinity War. And I wouldn't say it is predetermined because you can't go to the future. You can only speed time up using the Time stone (with what has been shown).
That doesn't make sense because Strange's actions in IW actually prove to be the fatal flaw in IW's story for the good guys, without the time stone Thanos cannot get the mind stone, so by giving up the time stone when he did Strange ensured Thanos's victory, hell giving up the time stone at all when it was hidden in a way Thanos couldn't even find it spells their defeat, it only makes sense if the scenario he saw where they won is the one in Endgame, which also makes sense with his if I tell you it wont happen exchange with Tony, that had to be one of the scenarios he saw, meaning he saw 14 million different final battles with Thanos, some could be of the battle in IW, Endgame, Endgame in the past, before Endgame when Thanos still had the stones or any other number of meetings between the two sides, but he saw 14 million variations of these and only once they won, and likely seeing that one winning scenario he saw key moments which must take place, such as giving up the stone at the right time to ensure Scott gets trapped in the QR when he did.
And Endgame doesn't show that's how the multiverse is created, just that is how you can time travel, because you do so not by changing your past but by becoming part of the past of another timeline which prevents you from rewriting your own history, The Ancient One claims that taking the stones out of existence creates branching points in time, but whether this is true or not who knows? maybe Thanos destroying the stones actually created the multiverse by this logic.
But multiverse/ parallel world theory or atleast one aspect of it from what I recall has it that there is an infinite amount of parallel universes, where in every possible outcome happens across them, as such many of the universes are so similar they are undistinguishable from others, you know there's a universe identical to ours where the only difference is I wore red socks instead of blue socks yesterday, they are created by choices and outcomes, big and small which there's nothing suggesting this isn't the case with the MCU
And we have seen the time stone reversing time and allowing Strange to deviate his path into an alternative timeline in Dr Strange.
The thing I a prime timeline suggest that it is THE untainted timeline, which also suggest there are no alternative timelines , but Dr Strange showed that there are, the time stone reverse time, it didn't use time travel, this is evident by there being only 1 Dr Strange and Co not 2 sets, so time travel isn't needed to create an alternative timeline just events happening differently.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 24, 2019 13:14:26 GMT
The Russos said that Steve lived out his life with Peggy in an alternate timeline, and that he returned to the main timeline to give Sam his shield. Again, how? How would he had come to this timeline from an alternate one without the use of the anchor? If he went back in time, from a future point, he would have gone back in the alternate reality he created. The only way he can make it to his original timeline is to use the anchor and that would mean landing on the pad that they were watching. People like me have been asking that question for the last four months. The impression most people got was that him being on the bench was simply done to be more dramatic. Also, the idea that Steve Rogers was married to Peggy Carter all along doesn’t even make sense. If that were the case, then why didn’t anyone ever bring up the fact that Peggy’s husband was another Captain America? Did Sharon not recognize him?
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Aug 24, 2019 13:29:03 GMT
Again, how? How would he had come to this timeline from an alternate one without the use of the anchor? If he went back in time, from a future point, he would have gone back in the alternate reality he created. The only way he can make it to his original timeline is to use the anchor and that would mean landing on the pad that they were watching. People like me have been asking that question for the last four months. The impression most people got was that him being on the bench was simply done to be more dramatic. Also, the idea that Steve Rogers was married to Peggy Carter all along doesn’t even make sense. If that were the case, then why didn’t anyone ever bring up the fact that Peggy’s husband was another Captain America? Did Sharon not recognize him? He could have been wearing one of those face masks we see in AOS, the ones which can be programmed to make you look like a completely different person without any hint of it being a mask.
As for how could Old Steve got there if he did travel back from another timeline simplest answer I can think is he came back before the Avengers did from the time heist, or between them getting back and Thanos showing up maybe? not like they were paying attention, Nebula brought Thanos through FFS and they didn't notice till he blew them the fuck up.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Aug 24, 2019 14:34:06 GMT
Sup charzino.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Aug 24, 2019 16:09:45 GMT
Did I miss something? I was just told it wasn't? I think we all know it classifies as a time travel movie. Depends on your classification of a "time travel movie". Does a movie simply need to employ time travel in some capacity to be considered a time travel movie, or does it need to be about time travel? Endgame uses time travel, but it is not about time travel. There is a distinction between the two that seems to have escaped you. It's interesting how often fans of other franchises need to come to the MCU board to be schooled in such things.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Aug 24, 2019 16:44:58 GMT
Yeah it is. I think it's hilarious there's even a debate about MCU's credibility on this - when there's the likes of oh I dunno, Time Stone & Quantum Realm sci-fi at play.
lols
|
|