|
|
Post by moviemouth on Aug 24, 2019 13:46:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 24, 2019 14:06:56 GMT
Well, I like the look of the movie. But when Tramp began talking, it seems weird.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Aug 24, 2019 14:08:55 GMT
Well, I like the look of the movie. But when Tramp began talking, it seems weird. Why does that seem weird?
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 24, 2019 14:09:58 GMT
Well, I like the look of the movie. But when Tramp began talking, it seems weird. Why does that seem weird? Uh, yeah I know, thanks for the reminder. Perhaps I thought the effects were dodgy. |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Aug 24, 2019 14:11:55 GMT
Why does that seem weird? Uh, yeah I know, thanks for the reminder. Perhaps I thought the effects were dodgy.Okay, that makes sense. It looks convincing to me, so that is why I was thrown off by your comment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Aug 24, 2019 14:12:55 GMT
The original film is 76 minutes long. This will likely have more padding than Zachary Levi did in Shazam!
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Aug 24, 2019 14:16:37 GMT
The original film is 76 minutes long. This will likely have more padding than Zachary Levi did in Shazam! I have a feeling that the whole movie will be different from the original, with the exception of the basic love story and the iconic spaghetti scene.
|
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on Aug 24, 2019 15:09:13 GMT
The original film is 76 minutes long. This will likely have more padding than Zachary Levi did in Shazam! I have a feeling that the whole movie will be different from the original, with the exception of the basic love story and the iconic spaghetti scene. It looks to be almost shot by shot. What makes you think this will be that different? |
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Aug 24, 2019 15:14:39 GMT
I have a feeling that the whole movie will be different from the original, with the exception of the basic love story and the iconic spaghetti scene. What makes you think this will be that different? Does it? I'll take your word on that. I guess my memory of the original is worse than I thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Aug 24, 2019 17:40:29 GMT
Typical unnecessary Disney remake.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 24, 2019 18:41:42 GMT
This is on Disney+ exclusively correct? I guess even they didn’t consider it cinematic enough for a theatrical release.
|
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on Aug 24, 2019 20:43:17 GMT
My biggest question that still hasn’t been confirmed it seems, Will Disney+ release it’s movies on dvd and Blu-Ray? Netflix doesen’t but that doesn’t mean Disney+ has to follow suit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Dec 1, 2019 10:23:14 GMT
LADY AND THE TRAMP 7/10 LADY AND THE TRAMP had a few songs here and there, while LADY AND THE TRAMP PART II: SCAMP'S ADVENTURE is more consistent as a musical. That's the only improvement in an otherwise bland sequel. Once again, the protagonist of a Disney sequel is the child of the protagonist of the 1st installment. Is that a good or bad thing? It really depends on the character and SCAMP just isn't very interesting. It doesn't help that Scott Wolf doesn't sound like a kid. Look up a picture of the junkyard dogs and then look up one of the pound dogs from the 1st movie. Tell me the former aren't copies of the latter. Why did director Darrell Rooney decide and/or aprove that the faces of JIM DEAR & DARLING (the dogs' owners) should be shown more often? Why does JIM DEAR hang the hats SCAMP has bitten? When SCAMP sings about wanting to run away in WORLD WITHOUT FENCES, no one hears him. That's OK; it's part of the musical genre logic. However, he yells "So long, you house dogs!" and other things after the song has ended. Do you want to get caught, you moron?! 4/10 LADY AND THE TRAMP 2019 4/10 ------------------------------------- You can read comments of other movies in my blog. |
|
