|
Post by brownstones on Apr 16, 2017 5:25:53 GMT
soooo yaba daba do
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Apr 16, 2017 16:46:44 GMT
10/10 Love it!
|
|
|
Post by RiP, IMDb on Jun 6, 2017 12:21:09 GMT
|
|
|
Post by bravomailer on Jul 15, 2017 13:47:27 GMT
8/10 – Tarantino's best. Unmarred by the silly violence in most of his films.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Jul 15, 2017 14:30:33 GMT
5/10 I really wanted to love it, but after seeing it twice for the last 15 years, this movie never did much for me. I was glad to see Pam Grier, Robert Forster and Michael Keaton got such good roles but Bobby D, Sam Jackson and Bridget Fonda took up just too much screen time for my liking.
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Jul 15, 2017 17:37:50 GMT
8/10 great movie with many twists, but far too long, great later role for Pam Grier though.
Tarantino is great giving nearly forgotten actors work, but sometimes it feels like he has too much dialog in his pics, that I at one pont wanted to scream "for heavens sake come to the point".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 28, 2017 23:52:49 GMT
6/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 1, 2017 19:30:50 GMT
A 5 for me, I found it all too boring and way too long.
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 17, 2017 4:09:41 GMT
9/10
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Nov 11, 2017 2:21:19 GMT
7/10
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 3, 2018 3:06:54 GMT
5, maybe even lower.
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Jan 3, 2018 3:25:36 GMT
Never seen it.
|
|
|
Post by someguy on Feb 20, 2018 3:14:15 GMT
7/10.
|
|
|
Post by sjg on Dec 28, 2018 13:33:43 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
Post by OldAussie on Jan 9, 2019 22:09:00 GMT
9/10 Tarantino's most mature film
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Jan 11, 2019 18:44:08 GMT
7/10
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 9, 2019 18:58:35 GMT
7/10.
|
|
|
Post by James on Jul 15, 2019 18:36:17 GMT
8/10
|
|
|
Post by jimanchower on Jul 15, 2019 19:13:15 GMT
8/10 great movie with many twists, but far too long, great later role for Pam Grier though. Tarantino is great giving nearly forgotten actors work, but sometimes it feels like he has too much dialog in his pics, that I at one pont wanted to scream "for heavens sake come to the point". His movies don't "sometimes feel like he has too much dialog" they do have too much dialog. Sometimes it works, like Pulp Fiction and sometimes it's awful, like most of his movies.
It seems to be working for him but I was a huge fan of his up until Kill Bill. Kill Bill is OK, it looks great but is waaaay too long and it's just a revenge flick padded out to close to what, 4 hours?
Death Proof was one of the worst films I've ever seen in a theater and the dialog in that is garbage. Inglorious Basterds was awful. I can't stand Django Unchained. Hateful 8 was OK until Sam Jackson started talking about making general's son suck his dick etc. Once the shooting started it turned into a generic, juvenile Tarantino flick that we've all seen too many times.
A friend of mine wants to go see Once Upon a Time in Hollywood and I just have zero interest.
It will be interesting to see how Tarantino's films are judged 20 years from now. I think he's just coasting on his rep and has been for years. He's like a restaurant in a good location at this point. His audience seems to have gone from film buffs or people who know and appreciate cinema to just general audiences who think stuff like someone getting their balls shot off or Hitler's head being shot 50 times is clever.
|
|
|
Post by jimanchower on Jul 15, 2019 19:16:59 GMT
Jackie Brown is OK, I didn't like it when I first saw it because it was so different from his first two films. Upon repeat viewings I grew to appreciate it more, I'm not big on rating movies using numbers but I marked it a 6. It's not great, it's not terrible.
I appreciate it more for the fact that Tarantino was trying to do something different. I hate to call it "mature" but it's not littered with his usual over the top characters spouting pop culture references so it's mature in that sense.
|
|