|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Oct 12, 2019 18:59:30 GMT
... for 5 billion.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Oct 12, 2019 19:07:34 GMT
it's perfectly plausible
|
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Oct 12, 2019 19:10:47 GMT
I would put it in the Plausible section, but not the probable one.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Oct 12, 2019 19:23:40 GMT
you never know!
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 12, 2019 20:36:17 GMT
$5 billion for movie rights? Yeah, I’m gonna have to call bullshit. That’s more than what Disney spent to buy Marvel in the first place. Also, why would this be wishful thinking? Spider-Man’s still in the MCU. What difference does it make if his movies aren’t distributed by Disney?
|
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Oct 12, 2019 20:44:46 GMT
$5 billion for movie rights? Yeah, I’m gonna have to call bullshit. That’s more than what Disney spent to buy Marvel in the first place. Also, why would this be wishful thinking? Spider-Man’s still in the MCU. What difference does it make if his movies aren’t distributed by Disney? Wishful thinking in that they would not just control Spiderman for 1 or 2 more movies, but for as many movies they want. Plus all the secondary and tertiary characters. We see what Sony was trying to make their Universe with Amazing Spiderman 2 and the Sinister 6. Venom was meh, and Morbius could go either way. Marvel would be planning all those things instead of Sony.
|
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Oct 12, 2019 20:50:04 GMT
$5 billion for movie rights? Yeah, I’m gonna have to call bullshit. That’s more than what Disney spent to buy Marvel in the first place. Also, why would this be wishful thinking? Spider-Man’s still in the MCU. What difference does it make if his movies aren’t distributed by Disney? Wishful thinking in that they would not just control Spiderman for 1 or 2 more movies, but for as many movies they want. Plus all the secondary and tertiary characters. We see what Sony was trying to make their Universe with Amazing Spiderman 2 and the Sinister 6. Venom was meh, and Morbius could go either way. Marvel would be planning all those things instead of Sony. I doubt Kevin Feige would’ve ever had any intention of tackling Venom and Morbius. They just don’t seem like the kind of characters he would be interested in. From what I understand, the only reason we’re even getting Blade in the MCU is because Mahershala Ali managed to persuade Feige into casting him as the character.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Oct 12, 2019 20:53:55 GMT
Wishful thinking in that they would not just control Spiderman for 1 or 2 more movies, but for as many movies they want. Plus all the secondary and tertiary characters. We see what Sony was trying to make their Universe with Amazing Spiderman 2 and the Sinister 6. Venom was meh, and Morbius could go either way. Marvel would be planning all those things instead of Sony. I doubt Kevin Feige would’ve ever had any intention of tackling Venom and Morbius. They just don’t seem like the kind of characters he would be interested in. From what I understand, the only reason we’re even getting Blade in the MCU is because Mahershala Ali managed to persuade Feige into casting him as the character. You could be right, but those were just examples we have now. If we are going to have a larger Spider-man Secondary Characters getting movies a lot of Fanboys would rather have Feige controlling them instead of Sony. It's all just rumors and wishful thinking by fanboys.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vassaggo on Oct 12, 2019 21:03:25 GMT
Wishful thinking in that they would not just control Spiderman for 1 or 2 more movies, but for as many movies they want. Plus all the secondary and tertiary characters. We see what Sony was trying to make their Universe with Amazing Spiderman 2 and the Sinister 6. Venom was meh, and Morbius could go either way. Marvel would be planning all those things instead of Sony. I doubt Kevin Feige would’ve ever had any intention of tackling Venom and Morbius. They just don’t seem like the kind of characters he would be interested in. From what I understand, the only reason we’re even getting Blade in the MCU is because Mahershala Ali managed to persuade Feige into casting him as the character. Also it would get the family back underneath Marvel's permanent control (except Hulk) which lots of people want.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkpast on Oct 12, 2019 23:08:17 GMT
Don't see that happening unless Sony decides to sell its movie studio
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 12, 2019 23:56:32 GMT
Unless Feige goes mad with power, it seems unlikely.
|
|
