|
Post by masterofallgoons on Dec 16, 2019 12:50:56 GMT
I haven't seen the movie, so I don't have much to add without responding to someone else at the moment. Do you have any legitimate discussion to contribute? If there is something you have to offer that hasn't been said, do it now and we can build from there. I feel like you and I each tried to discuss the movie and its release, and then the other remake a little bit, while others cried about feminists and called the director a prostitute. I think there's a pretty clear delineation. Not sure what your angle is here, but happy to respond. People offered their opinions on the film and the comments made by the director about the rating. You are the one that stated to me that you want legitimate discussion when it has ALL been legitimate.
The film is feminist slanted and that is the objective agenda of it. The director also prostituted herself out to the producers creatively, so in other words she sold out. All this has been discussed. I would save your expressions of contempt to the jerk offs that unleashed this lame reindeer, instead of being a jerk about the other posters, just because you feel they aren't living up to some kind of conceited lofty standards you feel you possess.
As much as I roll my eyes at this having the 'fiercely feminist' stance I have to roll my eyes 10 times more at someone who thinks it's clever and reasonable to call the director a prostitute. That's far lamer and more pathetic than this seemingly shitty movie could ever be. I would save all of your expressions of contempt for them instead of being a jerk to me because I don't live up to your conceited lofty standards that you feel you possess.
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Dec 16, 2019 15:30:33 GMT
As much as I roll my eyes at this having the 'fiercely feminist' stance I have to roll my eyes 10 times more at someone who thinks it's clever and reasonable to call the director a prostitute. That's far lamer and more pathetic than this seemingly shitty movie could ever be. I would save all of your expressions of contempt for them instead of being a jerk to me because I don't live up to your conceited lofty standards that you feel you possess. I don’t even think you really know what you are talking about. I am still waiting to hear something legitimate. I can just keep copying and pasting exactly the same quotes and saying them back to you, and it applies just as well. So what's the point here?
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Dec 16, 2019 22:47:28 GMT
I can just keep copying and pasting exactly the same quotes and saying them back to you, and it applies just as well. So what's the point here? If you can't grasp analogy or metaphors, then you won't be able to discuss legitimately. I can grasp them just fine. But when they're painfully stupid are they are exempt from ridicule? I thought the discussion thar included you, me and other users was wholly legitimate until, as usual, someone felt a need to mention Hitler, and then predictably it flew off the rails. But even that user was able to acknowledge that his post was absurd. Again, not sure what you're driving at here. You can tell me I don't know what I'm talking about, but if you have a point in trying to take me to task, I don't know that you've made it.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous Andy on Dec 16, 2019 23:58:18 GMT
Holy shit, is the internet tedious in 2019 or what?
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Dec 17, 2019 2:03:34 GMT
I can grasp them just fine. But when they're painfully stupid are they are exempt from ridicule? I thought the discussion thar included you, me and other users was wholly legitimate until, as usual, someone felt a need to mention Hitler, and then predictably it flew off the rails. But even that user was able to acknowledge that his post was absurd. Again, not sure what you're driving at here. You can tell me I don't know what I'm talking about, but if you have a point in trying to take me to task, I don't know that you've made it. I would say I have made my point loud and clear, but thanks for making some kind of "legitimate" attempt at playing, even if the illusionary obstacles of stupidity and ridicule threw you for a six and you came out last. I don't think you did, but if you're happy with yourself, then I'm happy for you. I don't know what 'threw you for a six' means, but whatever pleases you.
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Dec 17, 2019 2:21:53 GMT
I don't think you did, but if you're happy with yourself, then I'm happy for you. I don't know what 'threw you for a six' means, but whatever pleases you.Like mentioned earlier, you struggle with analogies and metaphors. Just don't prostitute yourself out for a six.... No issues with analogies or metaphors. Doubtful that this qualifies as either. The celebration of bad jokes is on brand for you though.
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Dec 17, 2019 11:28:09 GMT
No issues with analogies or metaphors. Doubtful that this qualifies as either. The celebration of bad jokes is on brand for you though. I've said my piece, the rest is on you.
I feel like I've responded to this very comment already, but if you're happy with the nothing you've already said, then I'm happy for you.
|
|
|
Post by Lebowskidoo 🦞 on Jan 5, 2020 13:34:46 GMT
If it had gone by some other title I might not have ... ...so much! Stop naming your movies after classics and calling them remakes, have the balls to be original and stop tainting the classics!
|
|
|
Post by Captain Spencer on Jan 5, 2020 15:55:52 GMT
If it had gone by some other title I might not have ... ...so much! Stop naming your movies after classics and calling them remakes, have the balls to be original and stop tainting the classics! Amen to that, brother.
|
|