|
|
Post by scabab on Nov 18, 2019 3:08:09 GMT
uk.ign.com/articles/2019/11/17/lou-ferrigno-disappointed-with-hulk-in-avengers-endgame-mark-ruffalo-bruce-banner-disneyWhile speaking at Canada’s Hamilton Comic Con (as reported by ComicBook.com), Ferrigno took umbrage with the way Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner, in the film, had merged his mind with Hulk's body. Though it was the film's take on Professor Hulk from the comics, Ferrigno felt it took away the monster aspect of Hulk that he felt was important. “What’s happening is that the first two Hulk movies, the CGI was improving, but the last one, Endgame, I was disappointed," Ferrigno said. "Because the Hulk needs to be hideous, he needs to be a creature." “You see in Endgame, Mark Ruffalo —- I think it has a lot to do with him and Disney -— I didn’t like the way it portrayed [Hulk]. It took away that beauty, that quality of the Hulk. That’s why a lot of people liked the [original Hulk] series.” Ferrigno also felt Avengers: Endgame was too “extreme with the spaceships, the shooting, the outer space.” “We need good stories," he added. "Good elements, good messages about life. Because when you see the [original Hulk] series, even like The Twilight Zone, the original Twilight Zone, you learn something from every episode."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 18, 2019 3:28:56 GMT
I see that.
|
|
|
|
Post by hobowar on Nov 18, 2019 5:33:28 GMT
I see where he's coming from. It didn't really bother me, but I hope we get to see the proper Hulk in a future film.
|
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Nov 18, 2019 13:10:11 GMT
He's totally right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 18, 2019 15:35:03 GMT
Don't think I've met anyone who was actually impressed with Endgame Hulk.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 18, 2019 17:36:13 GMT
Don't think I've met anyone who was actually impressed with Endgame Hulk. I'm sure ArArArchStanton thought it was the best interpretation yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Nov 19, 2019 0:07:15 GMT
Don't think I've met anyone who was actually impressed with Endgame Hulk. Meh, I'm fine with it. His 1-1 with Ancient One is great, & monster Hulk/Banner would not work well at all there. As it is, the Infinity Saga was greater than the sum of its parts. Hulk as chaos outcast wouldn't fit. Besides, they at least made it gradual enough from Ragnarok & IW.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 19, 2019 1:00:54 GMT
Don't think I've met anyone who was actually impressed with Endgame Hulk. Meh, I'm fine with it. His 1-1 with Ancient One is great, & monster Hulk/Banner would not work well at all there. As it is, the Infinity Saga was greater than the sum of its parts. Hulk as chaos outcast wouldn't fit. Besides, they at least made it gradual enough from Ragnarok & IW. So you think that Banner not being able to transform into the Hulk in IW and then getting Banner-Hulk in Endgame was gradual?
|
|
|
|
Post by thenewnexus on Nov 19, 2019 1:43:31 GMT
Endgame hulk looked like an overgrown Tom Arnold lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Nov 19, 2019 3:11:23 GMT
He's right dammit.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 19, 2019 16:57:34 GMT
He is spot on. Hulk was a huge disappointment and pretty much just a neutered pussy that couldn't get angry. Just worthless.
|
|
thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Nov 19, 2019 17:25:59 GMT
I don't love the Kiddie visual effects for Thor especially in that Thor movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Nov 19, 2019 18:05:37 GMT
There I summarized all of your posts.
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Nov 19, 2019 18:46:56 GMT
There I summarized all of your posts. 👌 |
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Nov 19, 2019 19:33:56 GMT
Meh, I'm fine with it. His 1-1 with Ancient One is great, & monster Hulk/Banner would not work well at all there. As it is, the Infinity Saga was greater than the sum of its parts. Hulk as chaos outcast wouldn't fit. Besides, they at least made it gradual enough from Ragnarok & IW. So you think that Banner not being able to transform into the Hulk in IW and then getting Banner-Hulk in Endgame was gradual? No, but Hulk being scared into the ground by Thanos… this became more about Banner & Hulk uniting... so if it's more on the laboratory science guy side, I'm fine with it. Besides, Hulk doesn't do much for me otherwise. I don't even know how Hulk works in EG other than token smashing at the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by Agent of Chaos on Nov 20, 2019 11:59:28 GMT
Well he didn’t even get a fight scene.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 24, 2019 2:08:53 GMT
Meh, I'm fine with it. His 1-1 with Ancient One is great, & monster Hulk/Banner would not work well at all there. As it is, the Infinity Saga was greater than the sum of its parts. Hulk as chaos outcast wouldn't fit. Besides, they at least made it gradual enough from Ragnarok & IW. So you think that Banner not being able to transform into the Hulk in IW and then getting Banner-Hulk in Endgame was gradual? I do. In Infinity War, Banner says to Hulk "Hulk, we got a lot to figure out, pal." Then they skip to 5 years later and they figure it out in that time. I mean, they even say it in the movie. It's not like they leave it up to the audience's imagination. They actually tell you what happened in those 5 years.
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Nov 24, 2019 5:04:56 GMT
So you think that Banner not being able to transform into the Hulk in IW and then getting Banner-Hulk in Endgame was gradual? I do. In Infinity War, Banner says to Hulk "Hulk, we got a lot to figure out, pal." Then they skip to 5 years later and they figure it out in that time. I mean, they even say it in the movie. It's not like they leave it up to the audience's imagination. They actually tell you what happened in those 5 years. Well I never said it was unexplained. Yes, it makes sense. That doesn't mean it was gradual though. There was nothing gradual about it. |
|
thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Nov 24, 2019 6:00:50 GMT
Endgame hulk looked like an overgrown Tom Arnold lol Looked like an animation.
|
|
|
|
Post by ThatGuy on Nov 24, 2019 16:23:01 GMT
I do. In Infinity War, Banner says to Hulk "Hulk, we got a lot to figure out, pal." Then they skip to 5 years later and they figure it out in that time. I mean, they even say it in the movie. It's not like they leave it up to the audience's imagination. They actually tell you what happened in those 5 years. Well I never said it was unexplained. Yes, it makes sense. That doesn't mean it was gradual though. There was nothing gradual about it. Okay, how about this. The 1st time we see the Hulk, he is pretty much uncontrollable (Incredible Hulk). The next time there is some control issues because of an outside influence (Loki), but we see that Banner has a handle on being able to turn into the Hulk at will (Avengers). Then we see that they have figured a way to bring Banner back (AoU). By Ragnarok, we see that, because he has been living as the Hulk for 2 years, Hulk's mental state has aged by that number of years (toddler). No change in Infinity War. By Endgame, Banner and Hulk have come to a type of peace agreement where they have merged into one person. An extroverted Banner. Seems pretty gradual from the beginning to Endgame.
|
|
