|
Post by Vits on Dec 1, 2019 10:24:28 GMT
LADY AND THE TRAMP 7/10 LADY AND THE TRAMP had a few songs here and there, while LADY AND THE TRAMP PART II: SCAMP'S ADVENTURE is more consistent as a musical. That's the only improvement in an otherwise bland sequel. Once again, the protagonist of a Disney sequel is the child of the protagonist of the 1st installment. Is that a good or bad thing? It really depends on the character and SCAMP just isn't very interesting. It doesn't help that Scott Wolf doesn't sound like a kid. Look up a picture of the junkyard dogs and then look up one of the pound dogs from the 1st movie. Tell me the former aren't copies of the latter. Why did director Darrell Rooney decide and/or aprove that the faces of JIM DEAR & DARLING (the dogs' owners) should be shown more often? Why does JIM DEAR hang the hats SCAMP has bitten? When SCAMP sings about wanting to run away in WORLD WITHOUT FENCES, no one hears him. That's OK; it's part of the musical genre logic. However, he yells "So long, you house dogs!" and other things after the song has ended. Do you want to get caught, you moron?! 4/10 LADY AND THE TRAMP 2019 4/10 ------------------------------------- You can read comments of other movies in my blog.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Dec 1, 2019 15:15:57 GMT
Hadn’t seen the remake. It didn’t interest me much. The original animated movie is pretty good. 7.5/10.
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Dec 5, 2019 19:26:23 GMT
The original film is an all-time animation classic with its beautifully drawn characters, great voice cast, glorious CinemaScope presentation, and lovely music. I'm favorable to the sequel since it's one of the better ones, but I pretty much agree with your critique. The remake is largely the same film, but more politically correct. The voice cast was nice and the dogs had enough CGI to be emotionally expressive.
|
|