|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 7, 2019 19:39:18 GMT
spirituality.
Until then, the field will continue to be owned by big pharma, pollute rivers with toxic waste, pollute people with toxic chemicals, and pollute third-world countries with barrels of toxic waste.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Dec 7, 2019 19:50:09 GMT
Define "spirituality". If you're talking about ghosts, demons, and all that silly stuff, by definition that isn't "science" (can't be observed, tested, detected in anyway).
"Until then, the field will continue to be owned by big pharma, pollute rivers with toxic waste, pollute people with toxic chemicals, and pollute third-world countries with barrels of toxic waste."
Pretty much all those have to do with corporate greed and political corruption, not scientists.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2019 20:06:30 GMT
Said it before : science will embrace spirituality when spirituality can prove its claims to scientific standards. The fact that nobody has been able to do that isn’t good news for believers in spirituality. That’s the fault of capitalism, not science. And it wouldn’t change one iota if we proved that ghosts were real.
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Dec 8, 2019 12:49:31 GMT
spirituality. Until then, the field will continue to be owned by big pharma, pollute rivers with toxic waste, pollute people with toxic chemicals, and pollute third-world countries with barrels of toxic waste. I think you are confusing 'science' with the lack of environmental controls on big business. Controls put in place after research and analysis by scientific researchers.
|
|
|
|
Post by Rodney Farber on Dec 8, 2019 12:59:13 GMT
Another emphatic assertion without supporting evidence
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Dec 8, 2019 14:01:39 GMT
I would argue they can;t embrace it since they can;t lab test it.
That said, they don't have the ability to dismiss it either. A lot of things of import aren't lab testable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zos on Dec 8, 2019 14:41:26 GMT
spirituality. Until then, the field will continue to be owned by big pharma, pollute rivers with toxic waste, pollute people with toxic chemicals, and pollute third-world countries with barrels of toxic waste. You spectacularly seem to misunderstand what the meaning of "Science" is.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman on Dec 8, 2019 14:54:31 GMT
Science coupled with spirituality lies at the heart of much science fiction.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 8, 2019 15:25:44 GMT
Define "spirituality". If you're talking about ghosts, demons, and all that silly stuff, by definition that isn't "science" (can't be observed, tested, detected in anyway). "Until then, the field will continue to be owned by big pharma, pollute rivers with toxic waste, pollute people with toxic chemicals, and pollute third-world countries with barrels of toxic waste." Pretty much all those have to do with corporate greed and political corruption, not scientists. Much of Christianity has been about providing excuses to ignore or rewrite Christ’s message and instead of spirituality, they substitute fear and superstition. That's a valid observation, IMHO. That can change one person at a time.
|
|
|
|
Post by thefleetsin on Dec 8, 2019 15:36:23 GMT
please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Dec 8, 2019 16:44:30 GMT
I feel like you already started this same thread a few months ago... Anyone else, or is it just me?
Also: Science is not "a field," but is a discipline made up of many fields. I'd be curious to hear how big pharma owns quantum physics.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 8, 2019 17:00:59 GMT
spirituality. Until then, the field will continue to be owned by big pharma, pollute rivers with toxic waste, pollute people with toxic chemicals, and pollute third-world countries with barrels of toxic waste. I think you are confusing 'science' with the lack of environmental controls on big business. Controls put in place after research and analysis by scientific researchers. No I'm not.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 8, 2019 17:02:01 GMT
I would argue they can;t embrace it since they can;t lab test it. That said, they don't have the ability to dismiss it either. A lot of things of import aren't lab testable. So which spirituality is the correct one? IMO, there's only one spirituality.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 8, 2019 17:10:06 GMT
IMO, there's only one spirituality. Really? Like The Dao? Or Sufism? New England Transcendentalism? Swedenborgism? Mormonism? Native American spiritualism? Yes, they're all connecting to the same spirituality.
|
|
|
|
Post by general313 on Dec 8, 2019 17:20:21 GMT
Science coupled with spirituality lies at the heart of much science fiction. But spirituality lies much more often than science.
|
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Dec 8, 2019 17:24:42 GMT
I think you are confusing 'science' with the lack of environmental controls on big business. Controls put in place after research and analysis by scientific researchers. No I'm not. Thank you for your opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Dec 8, 2019 22:17:09 GMT
Yes, they're all connecting to the same spirituality. How so? Don't they all teach connection with the 'One' consciousness? I think a few of them teach the Law of One, and that everything is connected and comes from one source.
|
|
|
|
Post by shadrack on Dec 8, 2019 22:55:10 GMT
|
|
