|
|
Post by petrolino on Dec 12, 2019 3:07:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Dec 12, 2019 14:22:14 GMT
Neither really. One's a modified ddt, and the other's a flat face bump. Both can be safe, and both can lead to a very dangerous accident if something goes wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Dec 12, 2019 15:14:31 GMT
Neither really. One's a modified ddt, and the other's a flat face bump. Both can be safe, and both can lead to a very dangerous accident if something goes wrong. Do you like them? I do because they can be so explosive. It's also the way both these guys find ways to move into them, I find entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Dec 13, 2019 20:51:32 GMT
Neither really. One's a modified ddt, and the other's a flat face bump. Both can be safe, and both can lead to a very dangerous accident if something goes wrong. Do you like them? I do because they can be so explosive. It's also the way both these guys find ways to move into them, I find entertaining. Not really for the Styles Clash, getting into it can be explosive but it isn't a move that can be hit in an instant due to AJ needing to hold the guy in position to set the arms behind his legs and stuff, Cesaro's old finisher is more explosive with pretty much the same bump, the Paradigm Shift however looks cool and simple enough, it also works on anyone, where as doing the Styles Clash to larger opponents looks a bit silly, and can be more dangerous.
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Dec 13, 2019 21:00:55 GMT
Do you like them? I do because they can be so explosive. It's also the way both these guys find ways to move into them, I find entertaining. Not really for the Styles Clash, getting into it can be explosive but it isn't a move that can be hit in an instant due to AJ needing to hold the guy in position to set the arms behind his legs and stuff, Cesaro's old finisher is more explosive with pretty much the same bump, the Paradigm Shift however looks cool and simple enough, it also works on anyone, where as doing the Styles Clash to larger opponents looks a bit silly, and can be more dangerous. In WWE rings now, people seem to clap to announce power slams and tap the backs of their opponent to warn a ddt is coming. I enjoy a good ddt - Christian Cage used to nail the tornado ddt - but theyseem to have been neutered, I guess for safety reasons.
I like Cesaro's neutralizer but I worry he's going to snap his own neck when he rearranges the head on his shoulders.
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Dec 16, 2019 14:15:15 GMT
Neither really. One's a modified ddt, and the other's a flat face bump. Both can be safe, and both can lead to a very dangerous accident if something goes wrong. Do you like them? I do because they can be so explosive. It's also the way both these guys find ways to move into them, I find entertaining. I like them both. The Styles Clash in particular is very unique to AJ so it really stands out much more than a modified DDT. Though Amrose's move works much better on everyone.
|
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Dec 16, 2019 15:05:54 GMT
Do you like them? I do because they can be so explosive. It's also the way both these guys find ways to move into them, I find entertaining. I like them both. The Styles Clash in particular is very unique to AJ so it really stands out much more than a modified DDT. Though Amrose's move works much better on everyone. It is odd how AJ somehow does the move in a way so much better than others, like I think Crash Holly and Michelle McCool both "stole" the move from him at points but neither give it the same feel that AJ does, they often felt more like they just went timber and fell on them, AJ gives it that snap that makes it seem like he is driving them into the canvas, where as the DDT's can rely more on the taker in regards to how it's going to look, like the Stunner, everyone took it different, I mean are there 3 more different takers of the move than Rock, McMahon and Scott Hall? not a one sells it like the others which is kinda hilarious as they all also sold it the same way everytime they took it.
|
|
