|
Post by lowtacks86 on Apr 21, 2017 3:08:53 GMT
I guess Fox News is gonna have to whore out Carlson more now.
|
|
|
Post by theoncomingstorm on Apr 21, 2017 3:13:49 GMT
He should be in prison for life.
|
|
|
Post by pennypacker on Apr 21, 2017 3:31:57 GMT
Absolutely.
|
|
|
Post by scienceisgod on Apr 21, 2017 4:58:16 GMT
O'Reilly pushed for the McCains and the Romneys and against the Ron Pauls and the Bannons. Libs don't understand that O'Reilly was one of theirs. "Last night (after bombing Syria) Trump finally became president". Guess who said that. It wasn't O'Reilly. It was John Kerry, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, Angela Merkel, etc... Wait until Rachael Maddow gets accused of sexual harassment by a revolving door of female subordinates.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Apr 21, 2017 12:56:58 GMT
The sad part is that O'Reilly is going to come out way ahead on this. 25 million to leave, Fox pays the lawsuit money, he's one of the top selling authors out there now, and he will still likely be snapped up by other media and paid millions more.
That is the best way to get fired for being a pervert.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Apr 21, 2017 22:13:05 GMT
Has he been found guilty of anything? If not then no.
If he has, then yes.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Apr 21, 2017 22:28:13 GMT
Has he been found guilty of anything? If not then no. If he has, then yes. Several women have came forward with sexual harassment allegations, the first incident was settled out of court years ago. I'm not gonna say he is or isn't guilty, admittingly I haven't looked much into it myself (though wouldn't really shock me if he did do it). From a purely business perspective, Fox New didn't really have much of a choice (they were losing sponsors left and right). I predict he'll go the same route as Glen Beck and Alex Jones and start his own independent media outlet on Youtube.
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Apr 22, 2017 0:02:37 GMT
Has he been found guilty of anything? If not then no. If he has, then yes. You don;t have to be guilty of anything to be fired. Reasonable doubt is only for criminal acts. most employment is at will and O'Reilly is a contract employee anyway that is probably getting his contract paid in ful to stop being on the air. Of course, his contract probably had lawsuits covered anyway
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2017 0:46:24 GMT
Has he been found guilty of anything? If not then no. If he has, then yes. His not being found guilt of things has cost his employers 13 million dollars. If you cost your employers that much money, do you think you'd keep your job?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2017 0:54:23 GMT
Fired?
Right now several outlets are begging to have him onboard.
And that's the memo.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Apr 22, 2017 5:20:37 GMT
I voted no opinion.
You're not the sailor-J who posted on the old board, are you?
|
|
vernuf
Sophomore
@vernuf
Posts: 310
Likes: 34
|
Post by vernuf on Apr 22, 2017 8:46:46 GMT
Fired? Right now several outlets are begging to have him onboard. And that's the memo. Assuming that's true, so? He's a scumbag either way.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Apr 22, 2017 10:31:59 GMT
Has he been found guilty of anything? If not then no. If he has, then yes. His not being found guilt of things has cost his employers 13 million dollars. If you cost your employers that much money, do you think you'd keep your job? Probably, but then I don't earn millions for my company either.
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Apr 22, 2017 10:34:46 GMT
Has he been found guilty of anything? If not then no. If he has, then yes. You don;t have to be guilty of anything to be fired. Reasonable doubt is only for criminal acts. most employment is at will and O'Reilly is a contract employee anyway that is probably getting his contract paid in ful to stop being on the air. Of course, his contract probably had lawsuits covered anyway I know that. But effectively we are saying that an accusation is enough for a person to lose their job. That shouldn't be acceptable
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Apr 22, 2017 10:38:49 GMT
You don;t have to be guilty of anything to be fired. Reasonable doubt is only for criminal acts. most employment is at will and O'Reilly is a contract employee anyway that is probably getting his contract paid in ful to stop being on the air. Of course, his contract probably had lawsuits covered anyway I know that. But effectively we are saying that an accusation is enough for a person to lose their job. That shouldn't be acceptable The problem is that OReilly is a face and voice of the company. And it was several accusations not just one. I can hardly blame any company for distancing themselves from someone in that situation. Especially shortly after the whole Tomi Lahren thing. They were quickly being viewed as very anti-woman.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 22, 2017 10:47:19 GMT
I would have fired him 20 years ago for being a loudmouth douche-bag.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Apr 22, 2017 10:50:38 GMT
I would have fired him 20 years ago for being a loudmouth douche-bag. But...that's why they hired him in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Apr 22, 2017 10:53:45 GMT
I would have fired him 20 years ago for being a loudmouth douche-bag. But...that's why they hired him in the first place. Someone should put me in a room with him for 10 minutes. I'd show him what sexual harassment feels like.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Apr 22, 2017 10:54:58 GMT
But...that's why they hired him in the first place. Someone should put me in a room with him for 10 minutes. I'd show him what sexual harassment feels like. Where are we gonna get a room at this hour?
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on Apr 22, 2017 10:56:51 GMT
I know that. But effectively we are saying that an accusation is enough for a person to lose their job. That shouldn't be acceptable The problem is that OReilly is a face and voice of the company. And it was several accusations not just one. I can hardly blame any company for distancing themselves from someone in that situation. Especially shortly after the whole Tomi Lahren thing. They were quickly being viewed as very anti-woman. Which is exactly why companies should develop balls and start acting properly.
|
|