|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 18, 2020 2:02:49 GMT
In Far From Home, Peter receives Tony's glasses, which Peter proceeds to use to order a military attack drone to target a fellow classmate. Peter later gives Tony's glasses to Mysterio, which Mysterio proceeds to use to order 100s of military attack drones to attack London. The glasses that Peter and Mysterio used to control the military attack drones were Tony's glasses. Now a government would have reason to want to have control of military attack drones, but there's no reason at all for a private citizen like Tony Stark to have control of 100s of military attack drones that can attack and kill anyone anywhere in the world, unless he's a terrorist. So Tony Stark was a terrorist. So like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga. all Peter wanted was an embarrassing photo of himself deleted. He didn't know he was going to send a drone that would target his classmate. Peter's intent is irrelevant. What's relevant is the fact that Tony Stark, a private citizen, was in possession of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones. But there's no legitimate reason for a private citizen like Tony Stark to have control of 100s of military attack drones, unless he was a terrorist. Tony could've used those glasses to send drones out in case the world was in danger of another alien threat, like in New York against the Chitauri or Thanos army. If Tony wanted the drones to be used against alien threats, then he should've turned the drones over to the government so that government leaders, elected by the people, would be the only ones who could order a strike. A private citizen, not elected by the people, who has control of 100s of military attack drones and who can unilaterally, without any checks or protocols, order a strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world is a terrorist who is just as much a threat to the world as an alien threat. He wanted to give them his protege because he sees Peter best fit take over his mantle. So you're saying that Tony Stark wanted to give control of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world to an irresponsible, high school kid?
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 18, 2020 2:04:44 GMT
I get that. But by giving a repsonse like that you give him exactly what he wants. Just block him. If everyone blocked him he'd have nobody to talk to. Quoting trolls and replying with gibberish is still helping them get their message out there and giving them the attention they want. If nobody replied to them they'd be forced to find another outlet and either get therapy or kill themselves much sooner. It's a win/win for humanity whichever they choose. You're clearly still bitter and salty that not only did Shady Brady and the Patriots have another one-and-done elimination from the playoffs this year but also I correctly picked Tennessee to beat New England in New England when almost no one gave Tennessee any chance of winning that game.
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Jan 18, 2020 2:08:20 GMT
all Peter wanted was an embarrassing photo of himself deleted. He didn't know he was going to send a drone that would target his classmate. Peter's intent is irrelevant. What's relevant is the fact that Tony Stark, a private citizen, was in possession of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones. But there's no legitimate reason for a private citizen like Tony Stark to have control of 100s of military attack drones, unless he was a terrorist. Tony could've used those glasses to send drones out in case the world was in danger of another alien threat, like in New York against the Chitauri or Thanos army. If Tony wanted the drones to be used against alien threats, then he should've turned the drones over to the government so that government leaders, elected by the people, would be the only ones who could order a strike. A private citizen, not elected by the people, who has control of 100s of military attack drones and who can unilaterally, without any checks or protocols, order a strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world is a terrorist who is just as much a threat to the world as an alien threat. He wanted to give them his protege because he sees Peter best fit take over his mantle. So you're saying that Tony Stark wanted to give control of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world to an irresponsible, high school kid? And this is why a lot of MCU fans are running away from here. No matter how they explain things to you, you continue with your own BS-parroting.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 18, 2020 2:27:06 GMT
Peter's intent is irrelevant. What's relevant is the fact that Tony Stark, a private citizen, was in possession of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones. But there's no legitimate reason for a private citizen like Tony Stark to have control of 100s of military attack drones, unless he was a terrorist. If Tony wanted the drones to be used against alien threats, then he should've turned the drones over to the government so that government leaders, elected by the people, would be the only ones who could order a strike. A private citizen, not elected by the people, who has control of 100s of military attack drones and who can unilaterally, without any checks or protocols, order a strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world is a terrorist who is just as much a threat to the world as an alien threat. So you're saying that Tony Stark wanted to give control of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world to an irresponsible, high school kid? And this is why a lot of MCU fans are running away from here. No matter how they explain things to you, you continue with your own BS-parroting. The only BS are the weak excuses for Steve Rogers spitting on "truth, justice, and the American way" by aiding and abetting someone who choked an injured and defenseless woman to death to flee from law enforcement officers and the weak excuses for Tony Stark, a private citizen, to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones that can kill anyone anywhere in the world.
|
|
raiderjedi
Sophomore
@raiderjedi
Posts: 452
Likes: 339
|
Post by raiderjedi on Jan 18, 2020 3:05:03 GMT
And this is why a lot of MCU fans are running away from here. No matter how they explain things to you, you continue with your own BS-parroting. The only BS are the weak excuses for Steve Rogers spitting on "truth, justice, and the American way" by aiding and abetting someone who choked an injured and defenseless woman to death to flee from law enforcement officers and the weak excuses for Tony Stark, a private citizen, to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones that can kill anyone anywhere in the world. R2-D2 and C-3PO were based on Laurel and Hardy
|
|
Wakanda
Sophomore
Refugee
@wellibers
Posts: 259
Likes: 244
|
Post by Wakanda on Jan 18, 2020 3:05:37 GMT
all Peter wanted was an embarrassing photo of himself deleted. He didn't know he was going to send a drone that would target his classmate. Peter's intent is irrelevant. What's relevant is the fact that Tony Stark, a private citizen, was in possession of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones. But there's no legitimate reason for a private citizen like Tony Stark to have control of 100s of military attack drones, unless he was a terrorist. Tony could've used those glasses to send drones out in case the world was in danger of another alien threat, like in New York against the Chitauri or Thanos army. If Tony wanted the drones to be used against alien threats, then he should've turned the drones over to the government so that government leaders, elected by the people, would be the only ones who could order a strike. A private citizen, not elected by the people, who has control of 100s of military attack drones and who can unilaterally, without any checks or protocols, order a strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world is a terrorist who is just as much a threat to the world as an alien threat. He wanted to give them his protege because he sees Peter best fit take over his mantle. So you're saying that Tony Stark wanted to give control of 100s of military attack drones capable of targeting anyone or any city anywhere in the world to an irresponsible, high school kid? Is a dream a lie if it doesnt come true or is it something worse?
|
|
Wakanda
Sophomore
Refugee
@wellibers
Posts: 259
Likes: 244
|
Post by Wakanda on Jan 18, 2020 3:06:07 GMT
Just block him. If everyone blocked him he'd have nobody to talk to. Quoting trolls and replying with gibberish is still helping them get their message out there and giving them the attention they want. If nobody replied to them they'd be forced to find another outlet and either get therapy or kill themselves much sooner. It's a win/win for humanity whichever they choose. You're clearly still bitter and salty that not only did Shady Brady and the Patriots have another one-and-done elimination from the playoffs this year but also I correctly picked Tennessee to beat New England in New England when almost no one gave Tennessee any chance of winning that game. Oh girls just wanna have fun.
|
|
Wakanda
Sophomore
Refugee
@wellibers
Posts: 259
Likes: 244
|
Post by Wakanda on Jan 18, 2020 3:06:53 GMT
And this is why a lot of MCU fans are running away from here. No matter how they explain things to you, you continue with your own BS-parroting. The only BS are the weak excuses for Steve Rogers spitting on "truth, justice, and the American way" by aiding and abetting someone who choked an injured and defenseless woman to death to flee from law enforcement officers and the weak excuses for Tony Stark, a private citizen, to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones that can kill anyone anywhere in the world. Can you a tell a green field from a cold steel rail?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2020 3:17:33 GMT
The glasses that Peter and Mysterio used to control the military attack drones were Tony's glasses. Now a government would have reason to want to have control of military attack drones... So Tony Stark was a terrorist. That's not actually what a terrorist is. So... no.
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Jan 18, 2020 14:15:47 GMT
The only BS are the weak excuses for Steve Rogers spitting on "truth, justice, and the American way" by aiding and abetting someone who choked an injured and defenseless woman to death to flee from law enforcement officers and the weak excuses for Tony Stark, a private citizen, to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones that can kill anyone anywhere in the world. Can you a tell a green field from a cold steel rail? A smile from a veil?
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 18, 2020 17:32:18 GMT
But there's no legitimate reason for a private citizen like Tony Stark to have control of 100s of military attack drones, unless he was a terrorist. Or a superhero. Oh yeah, that's right. Tony Stark was Iron Man. The superhero that saved the universe. You must have forgot. I understand that CTE is a degenerative condition. That explains most of your posts.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 18, 2020 18:36:48 GMT
But there's no legitimate reason for a private citizen like Tony Stark to have control of 100s of military attack drones, unless he was a terrorist. Or a superhero. No legitimate reason for a superhero to have control of 100s of military attack drones either. And Tony Stark was a terrorist who kept control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jan 18, 2020 18:58:38 GMT
No legitimate reason for a superhero to have control of 100s of military attack drones either. Yes there is. Attack drones can come in quite handy when you're an outnumbered superhero battling oodles of bad guys. What you could do does not make you a terrorist. What you do do, does. Since Tony Stark never issued such an order, you have provided indisputable proof that destroys your own argument. Well done, champ!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 18, 2020 19:04:59 GMT
And Tony Stark was a terrorist who kept control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga. Again : having control of 100s of military attack drones that you can unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world... is not what a terrorist is. You are claiming Tony Stark is a terrorist and then literally citing evidence that does not show him to be a terrorist.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 18, 2020 19:58:19 GMT
And Tony Stark was a terrorist who kept control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga. Again : having control of 100s of military attack drones that you can unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world... is not what a terrorist is. Yes, it is. If the police discovered that a private citizen had stockpiled all the ingredients and information needed to create a deadly chemical weapon, then that person would be put on a terrorist watch list, even if he hadn't actually created the chemical weapon yet, and an alert would be sent to every law enforcement agency. Tony Stark, a private citizen, had control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones, but there's no legitimate reason for any private citizen to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones, unless they're a terrorist. So Tony Stark was a terrorist. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga.
|
|
Wakanda
Sophomore
Refugee
@wellibers
Posts: 259
Likes: 244
|
Post by Wakanda on Jan 18, 2020 20:09:58 GMT
No legitimate reason for a superhero to have control of 100s of military attack drones either. And Tony Stark was a terrorist who kept control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga. The cat caught the mouse but didnt eat it.
|
|
Wakanda
Sophomore
Refugee
@wellibers
Posts: 259
Likes: 244
|
Post by Wakanda on Jan 18, 2020 20:10:40 GMT
Again : having control of 100s of military attack drones that you can unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world... is not what a terrorist is. Yes, it is. If the police discovered that a private citizen had stockpiled all the ingredients and information needed to create a deadly chemical weapon, then that person would be put on a terrorist watch list, even if he hadn't actually created the chemical weapon yet, and an alert would be sent to every law enforcement agency. Tony Stark, a private citizen, had control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones, but there's no legitimate reason for any private citizen to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones, unless they're a terrorist. So Tony Stark was a terrorist. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga. Snoring will reduce upon weight loss.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jan 18, 2020 20:23:48 GMT
Again : having control of 100s of military attack drones that you can unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world... is not what a terrorist is. Yes, it is. If the police discovered that a private citizen had stockpiled all the ingredients and information needed to create a deadly chemical weapon, then that person would be put on a terrorist watch list, even if he hadn't actually created the chemical weapon yet, and an alert would be sent to every law enforcement agency. Tony Stark, a private citizen, had control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones, but there's no legitimate reason for any private citizen to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones, unless they're a terrorist. So Tony Stark was a terrorist. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga. Except Tony Stark would never unilaterally order a strike on anyone or any city because he's a good guy, you dumbfuck.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jan 18, 2020 20:31:49 GMT
Yes, it is. If the police discovered that a private citizen had stockpiled all the ingredients and information needed to create a deadly chemical weapon, then that person would be put on a terrorist watch list, even if he hadn't actually created the chemical weapon yet, and an alert would be sent to every law enforcement agency. Tony Stark, a private citizen, had control of 100s of military attack drones that he could unilaterally order to strike against anyone or any city anywhere in the world. Governments might want to have control of military attack drones, but there's no legitimate reason for any private citizen to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones, unless they're a terrorist. So Tony Stark was a terrorist. Like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the main "hero" of their 22-movie saga. Except Tony Stark would never unilaterally order a strike on anyone or any city Tony Stark unilaterally created Ultron and unleashed Ultron on the world, without any authorization or approval from world leaders. Stark is an egotistical narcissist who doesn't respect the authority of the people. But you still don't get the point. What you claim Stark would or wouldn't do is irrelevant. The only thing that's relevant is that there's no legitimate reason at all for any private citizen to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones that serve no purpose other than to target and strike at anyone or any city anywhere in the world, unless they're a terrorist. Any private citizen with unilateral control of such deadly weapons would be classified by every government as a terrorist. And that's exactly what Tony Stark is - a terrorist. So like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the "hero" of their 22-movie saga.
|
|
|
Post by justanaveragejoe on Jan 18, 2020 20:35:21 GMT
Except Tony Stark would never unilaterally order a strike on anyone or any city Tony Stark unilaterally created Ultron and unleashed Ultron on the world, without any authorization or approval from world leaders. Stark is an egotistical narcissist who doesn't respect the authority of the people. But you still don't get the point. What you claim Stark would or wouldn't do is irrelevant. The only thing that's relevant is that there's no legitimate reason at all for any private citizen to have unilateral control of 100s of military attack drones that serve no purpose other than to target and strike at anyone or any city anywhere in the world, unless they're a terrorist. Any private citizen with unilateral control of such deadly weapons would be classified by every government as a terrorist. And that's exactly what Tony Stark is - a terrorist. So like I said before, MCU made a terrorist the "hero" of their 22-movie saga. You're an idiot. I'm done with this conversation.
|
|