|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 21, 2020 19:09:21 GMT
The ones I've crossed paths with haven't been that bad, but they're hopelessly indoctrinated into Rapture doctrine, and I fear it's going to cost them someday. It's going to cost a lot of folks. They are clearly radio rental... Can't stand them. They really are indoctrinated, and the opposite of all Christ's teachings. The feeling is mutual by the way. They call Catholicism 'New Babylon', and believe it's their mission to 'save' as many Catholics as possible from our wicked ways before their fictional rapture happens. Shower of bastards. You may not believe this, but the Protestantization of the Roman Catholic Church began in 1960. It was called Vatican II.
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on Jan 21, 2020 19:09:37 GMT
Hey, if you don't like that you're probably not going to like this either. This is what some think is the real culprit in the Australian fires, and the fires in California. C'mon! Why do you even bother? You know I don't watch you stupid YouTube crapola! When you post a YouTube vid, it is perfection, right?
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 21, 2020 19:18:06 GMT
They are clearly radio rental... Can't stand them. They really are indoctrinated, and the opposite of all Christ's teachings. The feeling is mutual by the way. They call Catholicism 'New Babylon', and believe it's their mission to 'save' as many Catholics as possible from our wicked ways before their fictional rapture happens. Shower of bastards. You may not believe this, but the Protestantization of the Roman Catholic Church began in 1960. It was called Vatican II. That cant be true. The Pope has papal infallibility, if he says it it is the word of God, there is no way something supported by the pope can be protestant.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 21, 2020 19:20:56 GMT
You may not believe this, but the Protestantization of the Roman Catholic Church began in 1960. It was called Vatican II. That cant be true. The Pope has papal infallibility, if he says it it is the word of God, there is no way something supported by the pope can be protestant. Yes, that's the official word on it, for those who believe in things like papal infallibility.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 21, 2020 19:21:37 GMT
That cant be true. The Pope has papal infallibility, if he says it it is the word of God, there is no way something supported by the pope can be protestant. Yes, that's the official word on it, for those who believe in things like papal infallibility. He is God's representative on Earth.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 21, 2020 19:23:39 GMT
That cant be true. The Pope has papal infallibility, if he says it it is the word of God, there is no way something supported by the pope can be protestant. Yes, that's the official word on it, for those who believe in things like papal infallibility. So you mean Catholics, the people who are affected by the proclamations of the Pope.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 21, 2020 19:23:39 GMT
Yes, that's the official word on it, for those who believe in things like papal infallibility. He is God's representative on Earth. So I've heard.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 21, 2020 19:25:34 GMT
Yes, that's the official word on it, for those who believe in things like papal infallibility. So you mean Catholics, the people who are affected by the proclamations of the Pope. Catholics or anyone else who buys that he's God's representative on earth.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 21, 2020 19:26:27 GMT
So you mean Catholics, the people who are affected by the proclamations of the Pope. Catholics or anyone else who buys that he's God's representative on earth. Who else would?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 21, 2020 19:28:41 GMT
Catholics or anyone else who buys that he's God's representative on earth. Who else would? I don't know, but you asked, and I answered. The Pope is infallible for those who believe in papal infallibility and him being God's representative on earth. For ones like me, it does not apply.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 21, 2020 19:30:32 GMT
I don't know, but you asked, and I answered. The Pope is infallible for those who believe in papal infallibility and him being God's representative on earth. For ones like me, it does not apply. If you believed in papal infallibility, the only option is being a Catholic, it is possibly the only correct self referencing argument.
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 21, 2020 19:32:13 GMT
I don't know, but you asked, and I answered. The Pope is infallible for those who believe in papal infallibility and him being God's representative on earth. For ones like me, it does not apply. If you believed in papal infallibility, the only option is being a Catholic, it is possibly the only correct self referencing argument. Can't imagine why you'd ask then, except to be a turd in the punchbowl, again. I'm going to work now. Later.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on Jan 21, 2020 19:33:39 GMT
If you believed in papal infallibility, the only option is being a Catholic, it is possibly the only correct self referencing argument. Can't imagine why you'd ask then, except to be a turd in the punchbowl, again. I'm going to work now. Later. I ask because your inability to write clear intelligent sentences makes your posts unclear and generally stupid. Have a great day at work.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jan 21, 2020 22:10:50 GMT
C'mon! Why do you even bother? You know I don't watch you stupid YouTube crapola! When you post a YouTube vid, it is perfection, right? What a truly stupid comment. I DO however tend to post YouTube vids that are either music, humorous or of documentary style, NOT the quasi religious/conspiracy theory crapola that you post on a regular basis.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jan 21, 2020 22:46:41 GMT
Highlighted lest anyone miss it and get you totally wrong. By the way it is not news, surveys have long been understood to have very different numbers of variables of various significance.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jan 22, 2020 14:56:05 GMT
Highlighted lest anyone miss it and get you totally wrong. By the way it is not news, surveys have long been understood to have very different numbers of variables of various significance. The only reason it's even "sometimes" is because Bayes Networks can get really complex and we don't typically know all the possibilities at work in any given situation. Still, this was very much "news" in that it was long thought impossible to infer causality from statistics.
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Jan 22, 2020 23:02:38 GMT
Highlighted lest anyone miss it and get you totally wrong. By the way it is not news, surveys have long been understood to have very different numbers of variables of various significance. The only reason it's even "sometimes" is because Bayes Networks can get really complex and we don't typically know all the possibilities at work in any given situation. Still, this was very much "news" in that it was long thought impossible to infer causality from statistics. Ya think? It's funny how you think you can lecture me on statistics when I have had the college text on it open in front of me the whole time. It's also funny how after I already got good grades you think you can give me bad ones. I'm sure a lot of things are news to you, but not me.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jan 22, 2020 23:41:56 GMT
The only reason it's even "sometimes" is because Bayes Networks can get really complex and we don't typically know all the possibilities at work in any given situation. Still, this was very much "news" in that it was long thought impossible to infer causality from statistics. Ya think? It's funny how you think you can lecture me on statistics when I have had the college text on it open in front of me the whole time. It's also funny how after I already got good grades you think you can give me bad ones. I'm sure a lot of things are news to you, but not me. What is the date of your college textbook? Did you look at the more current links given on new developments? You are Dunning Kruger overrating again!
|
|
|
Post by faustus5 on Jan 23, 2020 10:51:27 GMT
Ya think? It's funny how you think you can lecture me on statistics when I have had the college text on it open in front of me the whole time. It's also funny how after I already got good grades you think you can give me bad ones. And that, folks, is what textbook desperate narcissism looks like.
|
|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Jan 23, 2020 15:10:38 GMT
The only reason it's even "sometimes" is because Bayes Networks can get really complex and we don't typically know all the possibilities at work in any given situation. Still, this was very much "news" in that it was long thought impossible to infer causality from statistics. Ya think? It's funny how you think you can lecture me on statistics when I have had the college text on it open in front of me the whole time. It's also funny how after I already got good grades you think you can give me bad ones. I'm sure a lot of things are news to you, but not me. Which textbook? Because the one I'm referring to is about 20 years old. I guarantee that if yours dates before 2000 then this information is not in there.
|
|