|
Post by johnspartan on Feb 17, 2020 21:40:16 GMT
...Retard Johnsonless" is a more accurate title for TLJ. Discuss.
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on Feb 18, 2020 0:54:20 GMT
...Retard Johnsonless" is a more accurate title for TLJ. Discuss.
|
|
senan90
Junior Member
@senan90
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 546
|
Post by senan90 on Feb 18, 2020 1:11:24 GMT
...Retard Johnsonless" is a more accurate title for TLJ. Discuss. Another YouTube shitposter. A dime a dozen. Zzzz
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on Feb 18, 2020 1:32:47 GMT
Another YouTube shitposter. A dime a dozen. Zzzz Yeah. Except those YouTube videos aren’t just click baits or empty rants. They actually point out the many plot holes, suspect direction, and very flawed writing. I’m sure you won’t bother actually addressing any of those points because you wouldn’t be able to make a defense against it. And it goes against your bias.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Feb 18, 2020 7:39:04 GMT
Just a reminder: you will never get the Star Wars movies you want, while I have endless hours of Star Wars entertainment to look forward to.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Feb 18, 2020 8:43:59 GMT
JJ shot first:
- Luke has vanished - after letting his new Jedi Order being wiped out (again) - by a young Skywalker betrayer who was seduced by a dark side lord (again) - Luke does not clean up the mess by destroying Snoke and redeeming Kylo - but hides on a remote island pouting depressingly by the sea - letting the Empire RISE again "in the meantime" and leaving his family & friends behind - leaving a silly map puzzle behind in his comatose droid
^ the hack pen is mightier than the laser sword. This is how Jake Skywalker was born from the ashes of Luke Skywalker.
Drinking green milk just follows.
|
|
|
Post by Tristan's Journal on Feb 18, 2020 9:14:48 GMT
Just a reminder: you will never get the Star Wars movies you want, while I have endless hours of Star Wars entertainment to look forward to. John Stuart Mill: Wonder what JS Mill would have said about Disney shills?
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on Feb 18, 2020 17:19:34 GMT
Just a reminder: you will never get the Star Wars movies you want, while I have endless hours of Star Wars entertainment to look forward to. Just a reminder. I already have a great SW library that I enjoy for endless hours. You’re too late. I already have SW movies and shows that I enjoy. You, on the other hand, continue to fill yourself with the ideal of hating those who don’t share your taste in SW. And get self fulfillment by clinging to a notion that those who don’t will be made miserable by never getting “their SW”. You remind me of General Grievous. When he couldn’t realize his dreams of being a Jedi he replaced it with an empty hatred of all Jedi, and a perverse obsession with exterminating all of them. If Grievous couldn’t be a Jedi then no one would be. Similarly, (for you), anyone who doesn’t agree with your exact taste in SW shouldn’t get to enjoy SW or have their taste in it met. Grievous replaced most his organic body with “mechanical improvements”. Similarly, the sequel/Disney trilogy (that you love and defend inflexibly and hypersensitively) has an organic look and feel onscreen. But the mythos and characterization have been occasionally swapped with “mechanical” Disney tropes and mantras. And the overall story arc is a mechanical hodgepodge of a mess - with each movie feeling disjointed from the next. I think I’ll think of you with a mechanical cough now when you post...
|
|
senan90
Junior Member
@senan90
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 546
|
Post by senan90 on Feb 18, 2020 23:54:52 GMT
Another YouTube shitposter. A dime a dozen. Zzzz Yeah. Except those YouTube videos aren’t just click baits or empty rants. They actually point out the many plot holes, suspect direction, and very flawed writing. I’m sure you won’t bother actually addressing any of those points because you wouldn’t be able to make a defense against it. And it goes against your bias. What bias? I've already ranked the series accordingly. I'm not giving the time of day to some YouTube idiot. plot holes? well the saga isn't perfect, but personally I'm not bothered. Yes, The Emperor doesn't like lightsabers but I can live with that, "these blast shields much too accurate for jawas, only imperial stormtroopers are precise", Stormtroopers are accurate?. Characterization is important for me. Luke is a far more fascinating character in TLJ, and he does go out in the hero in the end. Anyway, a film's plot isn't important for me anymore, it's how we respond to characters and their motivations. TLJ has the best character development and arc in the series. Anyway, I like the first two Disney films along with Star Wars. They're fun films.
|
|
senan90
Junior Member
@senan90
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 546
|
Post by senan90 on Feb 26, 2020 21:34:56 GMT
Another YouTube shitposter. A dime a dozen. Zzzz Yeah. Except those YouTube videos aren’t just click baits or empty rants. They actually point out the many plot holes, suspect direction, and very flawed writing. I’m sure you won’t bother actually addressing any of those points because you wouldn’t be able to make a defense against it. And it goes against your bias. Alright, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and check this person's videos. The first one I clicked was "Disney have ruined Lightsabers". First 30 seconds is a total fail. He says before Disney, lightsabers used to be "dramatic"...erm.. okay "A dramatic and personal battle between two friends" "Maybe Sonic shouldn't have made his movie..." Yep, no personal bias there. He then criticises the lightsaber's functionality in Disney..okay. What about Luke's baseball-bat saber in the Sail barge? Again, totally, no personal bias. "Robot Head blocked by Rian Johnson." - Based on his twitter feed, all this guy does is bitch and moan, and probably tagged and spammed Johnson incessantly. TLDW; The videos are all trivial nitpicks and empty bluster. For the most part I accept that Disney Star Wars have tweaked the lore of Star Wars, people don't like that and I accept that criticism, but I would argue that characterisation is better than plot. It's ambiguous why Luke has quit but I like that he is heartbroken and full of regret. It makes for better thematic storytelling. So yep, like Eight Thoughts, this nobody is another Youtube shitposter who does nothing to milk his content to generate views/ad revenue. Gawd, I can't believe I wasted time on this bozo. BTW it's laughable that he uses the term "shill" when he e-begs on Patreon.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Feb 26, 2020 23:55:29 GMT
People who clicked like on a post with "Retard Johnsonless" should be embarrassed.
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Feb 27, 2020 0:16:18 GMT
People who clicked like on a post with "Retard Johnsonless" should be embarrassed. You're too easily triggered so piss off, snowflake.
|
|
|
Post by Waxer-n-boil on Feb 27, 2020 0:37:20 GMT
Yeah. Except those YouTube videos aren’t just click baits or empty rants. They actually point out the many plot holes, suspect direction, and very flawed writing. I’m sure you won’t bother actually addressing any of those points because you wouldn’t be able to make a defense against it. And it goes against your bias. Alright, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and check this person's videos. The first one I clicked was "Disney have ruined Lightsabers". First 30 seconds is a total fail. He says before Disney, lightsabers used to be "dramatic"...erm.. okay "A dramatic and personal battle between two friends" "Maybe Sonic shouldn't have made his movie..." Yep, no personal bias there. He then criticises the lightsaber's functionality in Disney..okay. What about Luke's baseball-bat saber in the Sail barge? Again, totally, no personal bias. The first video I posted was Mark Hamill detailing his criticism of Rian Johnson’s characterization of Luke in TLJ. It was not Robothead’s lightsaber video. I didn’t post Robotheads lightsaber video because I don’t agree with all of his points of criticism (although I agree with some of them). And I think it’s one of his weaker videos. But I see you posted about it anyway. This video is a brief but very tame rant actually. I just posted it for fun and it is yet another example of Rian’s trolling behavior. The last 2 videos listed many relevant flaws: messing up the lore, badly written characters, plot holes... (If you didn’t pick up on them I suppose I could list them in a subsequent post). I also find it ironic that you found all of those points as blustery nitpicking. However you regard the RLM/Mr. Plinkett reviews of the prequels as entirely accurate and valid masterpieces of criticism. And believe me, some of the points in those videos are hypercritical hyperbole. And sometimes outright inaccurate. Robothead is no less valid in his points of criticism. In fact he may have a better percentage of valid points versus hypercritical nitpicking. So yeah, if you can’t see his validity but you can see it in the Plinkett reviews - it’s obviously because of bias. Well, you aren’t the only one fond of the characterization. In principle I can see your point. In actuality, all of the writers who came up a writing of Luke for episode 8 had him being in exile. But I (as well as a considerable number of other fans) found Johnson’s version as campy and overdone. Not to mention some of his behavior as uncharacteristic. Even Hamill himself came to the same conclusion. When you explain how all of RLM/Mr. Plinkett’s reviews are a bunch of laughable, spewed garbage from worthless YouTube clowns; then I’ll start taking your criticisms seriously. Until then, any criticisms you have of Robothead, I find it to be a joke.
|
|