|
Post by hi224 on May 13, 2017 13:44:33 GMT
Pretty creepy stuff honestly.
|
|
|
Post by clusium on May 13, 2017 15:14:31 GMT
Pretty creepy stuff honestly. What was this, exactly?
|
|
|
Post by MCDemuth on May 13, 2017 15:28:44 GMT
I don't know what you are talking about either...
Please provide a short description of the accident or provide a link.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 13, 2017 15:42:08 GMT
A couple of airforce pilots were intercepting a blip on their radar as an instance in contact was made the plane and mystery object became one on radar and pretty much vanished.
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on May 14, 2017 11:15:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on May 14, 2017 12:58:00 GMT
So, if it was an UFO, the would imply some kind of "tractor beam" or the F-89 being pulverized ? I don't exclude those options but I'm one of those doubting Thomas. I need proof on the table. That leaves us with a few things, if there is no UFO nor coverup. First, the F-89 wasn't shot down by the C-47. The C-47 isn't not a fighter but a transport plane. In war zones you may have a gunship version but there is no information supporting that for the RCAF plane. Second, if the 2 planes collided, the DC3 pilot would have felt something. I'm also pretty sure people would have noticed, on landing, that the C-47 had a "built-in" F-89, if both planes were stuck together after a collision. Any damage to the C-47 would have also been noticed. Now the C-47 pilot claims he didn't see anything despite the fact (according to the official version) that the 2 signals merged on radar. I'm pushing a bit but why would he lie? What does he gain from lying? Deflecting attention from the fact he saw the F-89 in trouble and didn't signal anything or deflect the attention from himself because he may have been smuggling stuff with the C-47? Not impossible but nothing points in that direction. Could it be possible that the F-89 crashed near the C-47 (from a radar perspective) but nothing was felt nor seen by the Canadian plane because of differences in altitude? Could the F-89 have been in trouble and had mechanical problems prior to having his target in sight but still managed to reach its location ? That's some big "if". Having access to the radio conversations between the 2 crew members and the radar station would help a lot but it seems it's not going to happen. Not being able to find the plane doesn't help either. But then, as improbable as it may be that the plane crashed in the lake on the same spot the C-47 was "seen" on radar, I still think it's possible. The reason is this story: www.cbc.ca/news/canada/tower-and-crash-victim-come-down-1.294485The picture isn't so clear but that was 16 years ago: www.tvanouvelles.ca/2001/04/22/le-bureau-de-la-securite-dans-les-transports-enquete-sur-laccident-davion-en-mauricieBasically, on a foggy night, a pilot crashed his Cessna into a communication tower. The tower was 330 meters/1085 ft high. You could say the guy was unlucky (which is true) and that he was flying in the wrong place but (despite the fog) here is the improbable part, in a radius you can count in km/miles, there was nothing higher than trees around that tower. Not only that but if you look at the picture in the second link, it's not a wing that hit and the plane went to the ground. He hit it dead center (he died on impact) and the plane got stuck up there! The tower wasn't miles wide. They had to bring down the tower to get his body and the plane. What are the chances, even in low visibility, that you hit dead center the only thing higher than trees in a km/miles wide radius? Back to the main question, I don't discard the possibility of UFOs being involved but I would lean towards the crazy/unlikely accident, even if the plane is still missing.
|
|
|
Post by clusium on May 14, 2017 15:11:07 GMT
A couple of airforce pilots were intercepting a blip on their radar as an instance in contact was made the plane and mystery object became one on radar and pretty much vanished. Maybe the 2 of them collided with one another, & blew up right in the air (not suggesting that's good news. Just offering an explanation).
|
|
|
Post by maya55555 on May 19, 2017 17:24:45 GMT
clusium
Wreckage and debris?
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 19, 2017 17:43:11 GMT
What's so strange though lets say they did collide, wouldn't there be at least a few small debris parts perhaps?. i need an aviation expert here.
|
|