|
Post by Penn Guinn on Aug 3, 2022 21:08:36 GMT
What about Kammie and Jotato who denigrated the vaccines that were developed under Trump. One day you are going on about "forced vaccination mandates" and then you flip flop and say that PRESIDENT BIDEN and VICE-PRESIDENT HARRIS "denigrate the vaccines". Which is it ?
|
|
|
Post by cooly44 on Aug 3, 2022 21:09:33 GMT
Which version of science are we using here? All the catastrophic climate predictions that never came true? Maybe all the experts who told us, variously, that masks were not necessary, then very necessary. What about Kammie and Jotato who denigrated the vaccines that were developed under Trump. Or it could be those who solemnly promised that if you got vaccinated you’d never get covid and it would die out. The only science you people know is political science. Please stop lying. If that’s even possible. thehill.com/opinion/white-house/563771-guess-who-undermined-public-confidence-in-vaccines/Harris had stated that any such effort pushed by then-President Trump was untrustworthy. This was consistent with the Biden campaign theme that the Trump administration had been incompetent in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic — a position that morphed, when President Biden took office, into a claim that the Trump team hadn’t even had a workable plan on vaccine distribution (a claim so patently false that even Anthony Fauci, director of the Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, denied it).
|
|
|
Post by cooly44 on Aug 3, 2022 21:10:47 GMT
What about Kammie and Jotato who denigrated the vaccines that were developed under Trump. One day you are going on about "forced vaccination mandates" and then you flip flop and say that PRESIDENT BIDEN and VICE-PRESIDENT HARRIS "denigrate the vaccines". Which is it ? Hi dummy. You can be pro-vaccine and anti-mandate. There’s a huge difference.
|
|
|
Post by Penn Guinn on Aug 3, 2022 21:16:02 GMT
One day you are going on about "forced vaccination mandates" and then you flip flop and say that PRESIDENT BIDEN and VICE-PRESIDENT HARRIS "denigrate the vaccines". Which is it ? Hi dummy. You can be pro-vaccine and anti-mandate. There’s a huge difference. YOU have complained about Biden's "forced mandates" of a vaccine he is in favor of (which "mandates" affect YOU not one jot, but that is neither here, nor there) and you claim that he denigrates that same vaccine. Which is it ?
RE: "dummy" ... It's quite noticeable how you use your juvenile schoolyard and family names when you have nothing else.....
|
|
|
Post by cooly44 on Aug 3, 2022 21:19:06 GMT
Hi dummy. You can be pro-vaccine and anti-mandate. There’s a huge difference. YOU have complained about Biden's "forced mandates" of a vaccine he is in favor of (which "mandates" affect YOU not one jot, but that is neither here, nor there) and you claim that he denigrates that same vaccine. Which is it ?
RE: "dummy" ... It's quite noticeable how you use your juvenile schoolyard and family names when you have nothing else..... I’ve shown you the juvenile names you use. You’re a hypocrite as well as an idiot. Also quite noticeable how you don’t address the salient point.
|
|
|
Post by Penn Guinn on Aug 3, 2022 21:23:51 GMT
YOU have complained about Biden's "forced mandates" of a vaccine he is in favor of (which "mandates" affect YOU not one jot, but that is neither here, nor there) and you claim that he denigrates that same vaccine. Which is it ?
Also quite noticeable how you don’t address the salient point. The salient point is that you have said that he has mandated the use of a vaccine that you claim he has denigrated ... can you show where he has done either or both ?
|
|
|
Post by Shays rebelling on Aug 3, 2022 21:24:20 GMT
Please stop lying. If that’s even possible. thehill.com/opinion/white-house/563771-guess-who-undermined-public-confidence-in-vaccines/Harris had stated that any such effort pushed by then-President Trump was untrustworthy. This was consistent with the Biden campaign theme that the Trump administration had been incompetent in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic — a position that morphed, when Presidential Biden took office, into a claim that the Trump team hadn’t even had a workable plan on vaccine distribution (a claim so patently false that even Anthony Fauci, director of the Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, denied it). That happens to be a fact. NOBODY (except MAGA idiots) denies Trump mishandled the pandemic. But that”s not what you referred to in your post. You stated Biden/Harris denigrated the vaccine itself. That’s a lie. Also, who from the CDC or Biden administration, said the vaccine was 100% effective in preventing Covid infection?
|
|
|
Post by rachelcarson1953 on Aug 3, 2022 21:38:46 GMT
Is your tortoise scared, poor guy? No, he does battle with it and the velociraptor every day and wins At least, that's what it looks like when he climbs over them 😂 Awwww... In the time since I posted that, I have been on the old IMDb reading the seemingly endless tidbits of information on the filming of Jurassic Park. I went there to see if the sick dinosaur was a Triceratops (it is!) So, there it is! If it hadn't been real, it wouldn't have been in the movie, LOL! But after discovering that, I got entranced by all the information on the site about the filming and the science in that movie. I finally stopped reading about a third of the way through. If ever I have nothing to read before bedtime, I can always go back to that! I am so glad your little guy gets to beat the dinosaurs every day, he has a great tortoise life.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Aug 3, 2022 21:43:39 GMT
I usually tune out anyone who claims “the science is settled”.
|
|
|
Post by Heretic the Musk Whisperer on Aug 3, 2022 22:05:26 GMT
Doesn't science says energy can't be created or destroyed? So where was all that energy before the magical big bang that nobody can explain HOW it happened, science just KNOWS it did? Oh and remember triceratops? Science told us all about them for many many many years, then science said 'oops we made a mistake, NO such dinosaur ever lived'. The Big bang had a humongous gravitational pull that concentrated all the matter in a small area. It was then converted to Kinetic energy. But you are right that they don't know the catalyst for this.
|
|
|
Post by Heretic the Musk Whisperer on Aug 3, 2022 22:13:24 GMT
I love that it only took 3 replies in this thread to get a monument to not only the precise sort of cherry picking the article describes, but the usual “BUT THEN IT CHANGED!” objection to consensus. Gloriously ironic and wonderfully apt. We knew in the 1800s that CO2 from industrialization was warming the globe. They are even articles about it then. It's not hard to figure out. For proof of this, just look how long people having been putting CO2 in greenhouses and noticed that they were warmer. The problem here is that people don't want to believe. Just like meat eaters don't want to admit the colossal damage they are doing to the planet, which is worse because it pollutes and causes massive habitat loss. Just like outdoor cat owners don't want to admit that they are doing irreversible ecological damage, especially to small mammals and birds. Just like people who believe in illegal immigration turn a blind eye to the massive ecological damage it does.
|
|
|
Post by Heretic the Musk Whisperer on Aug 3, 2022 22:25:19 GMT
I usually tune out anyone who claims “the science is settled”. Someone who understands the science should be able to explain it and not just parrot. For instance, animal husbandry is the chief cause of global warming and yet they demonize us for cars. I am not saying cars and transportation aren't a huge factor (they're less than industrial production ethough). The reason is because methane gas is a much more potent greenhouse gas, and because cutting down trees for animal husbandry (and crops to a much lessor extent) creates CO2, as well as gets rid of a huge source of removing CO2 from the air. This is why plants in a greenhouse with CO2 grow bigger and better than those not in a greenhouse. Plus, if we didn't have to farm so much food for livestock (and ship it), we could have more trees.
|
|
|
Post by twothousandonemark on Aug 3, 2022 22:49:37 GMT
Social media has gifted humanity with infinite amateur doctors & scientists online at the ready to counter 'actual science'.
|
|
|
Post by Shays rebelling on Aug 4, 2022 1:56:13 GMT
I usually tune out anyone who claims “the science is settled”. ^^ But hangs on to every word from Joe Rogan.
|
|
|
Post by Penn Guinn on Aug 4, 2022 1:59:47 GMT
Social media has gifted humanity with infinite amateur doctors & scientists online at the ready to counter 'actual science'. Sadly..they have a "no return" policy on those totally worthless gifts!
|
|
|
Post by thekindercarebear on Aug 4, 2022 2:01:44 GMT
Social media has gifted humanity with infinite amateur doctors & scientists online at the ready to counter 'actual science'. I may not be a real doctor but I think i am as smart as one on imdb politics. 😏
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Aug 4, 2022 9:39:05 GMT
I usually tune out anyone who claims “the science is settled”. ^^ But hangs on to every word from Joe Rogan. Shays rebelling = always wrong.
|
|
|
Post by hugsfromlv426 on Aug 4, 2022 17:08:43 GMT
Researchers Say They've Figured Out Why People Reject Science, And It's Not Ignorance
I assumed it was because of the weird way that old guy in the Thomas Dolby video yelled "Science!"
|
|