|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 19, 2024 0:05:38 GMT
An ad hominem is not an argument. With each one you become more offensive. Your continuing evasion duly noted. There, saved you the bother. You didn't answer the question. Will I be needing to italicize it? Then you know what it feels like. Also your question is a fallacious way of arguing, a loaded question. which includes a controversial assumption. So the correct response is that I have never done that. But in this case, context is everything. In the case of a god, say, who has been notably vocal in its opposition to murder, asking whether ordering genocide is likely to be moral hypocrisy is not fallacious since the assumption is warranted. Just as, if a defendant has previously admitted beating his wife, then "when did you stop beating your wife" is perfectly legitimate. In the same way if - and this is a theoretical question, obviously - you have long been famous for condemning those who illegally park on the grass in the widest and strongest possible terms, asking whether your claim that you 'work in mysterious ways' (ie something which is not a controversial assumption) when doing that is similarly enough to justify your actions and counter the claim of moral hypocrisy is not fallacious, especially before an arresting officer. I hope that helps. If you feel it is, then all you can say is that 'I have never done that'. The trouble is of course that you have already admitted to parking on the grass and we have both agreed that no one knows your exact motive. See how it works? Another diversion identified and dealt with, you're welcome. And- evasion still noted.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 19, 2024 0:09:39 GMT
You didn't answer the question. Will I be needing to italicize it? Then you know what it feels like. Also your question is a fallacious way of arguing, a loaded question. But the correct response is that I have never done that. But in this case, context is everything. In the case of a god, say, who has been notably vocal in its opposition to murder, asking whether this is likely to be moral hypocrisy is not fallacious. Just as, if a defendant has admitted beating his wife, then "when did you stop beating your wife" is perfectly legitimate. In the same way if - and this is a theoretical question, obviously - you have long been famous for condemning those who illegally park on the grass in the widest and strongest possible terms, asking whether the claim that you 'work in mysterious ways' when doing that is similarly enough to justify your actions and counter the claim of moral hypocrisy is not fallacious, especially before an arresting officer. I hope that helps. Another diversion identified and dealt with, you're welcome. Nope, still no answer here..
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 19, 2024 0:13:08 GMT
Then you know what it feels like. Also your question is a fallacious way of arguing, a loaded question. But the correct response is that I have never done that. But in this case, context is everything. In the case of a god, say, who has been notably vocal in its opposition to murder, asking whether this is likely to be moral hypocrisy is not fallacious. Just as, if a defendant has admitted beating his wife, then "when did you stop beating your wife" is perfectly legitimate. In the same way if - and this is a theoretical question, obviously - you have long been famous for condemning those who illegally park on the grass in the widest and strongest possible terms, asking whether the claim that you 'work in mysterious ways' when doing that is similarly enough to justify your actions and counter the claim of moral hypocrisy is not fallacious, especially before an arresting officer. I hope that helps. Another diversion identified and dealt with, you're welcome. Nope, still no answer here.. Didn't see where I said "I have never done that" then huh ? Lol. Where's your answer then? This must be the seventh time of asking. Aren't you embarrassed? (My response was expanded a little before I read your non-answer)
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 19, 2024 0:17:14 GMT
Non posso, caro mio ! 💕🥰💋🖐 Basta smettere di prendere tempo.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 19, 2024 0:21:14 GMT
Nope, still no answer here.. Didn't see where I said "I have never done that?" lol. Where's your answer then? This must be the seventh time of asking. Aren't you embarrassed? (My response was expanded a little before I read your non-answer) Ad hom and evasion noted.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 19, 2024 0:28:12 GMT
Didn't see where I said "I have never done that?" lol. Where's your answer then? This must be the seventh time of asking. Aren't you embarrassed? (My response was expanded a little before I read your non-answer) Ad hom and evasion noted. I questioned if you were embarrassed, I didn't say you were (even if embarrassment is an insult at all) Also, please check back to where I answered your question, just above. Imitation, though ,is the sincerest form of flattery, I'll give you that.. But, since we have disposed of your latest diversion, and this last where you are reduced to imitating me, hadn't you better address my question? Your number of refusals must be approaching double figures...
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 19, 2024 0:37:31 GMT
Ad hom and evasion noted. I questioned if you were embarrassed, I didn't say you were (even if embarrassment is an insult at all) Also, please check back to where I answered your question, just above. Imitation, though ,is the sincerest form of flattery, I'll give you that.. But, since we have disposed of your latest diversion, and this last where you are reduced to imitating me, hadn't you better address my question? Your number of refusals must be approaching double figures... Still no answer to my question, and ad hom still noted.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 19, 2024 1:13:53 GMT
Non posso, caro mio ! 💕🥰💋🖐 Basta smettere di prendere tempo. « Nulla certior custodia innocentia »😇
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 19, 2024 20:53:26 GMT
I questioned if you were embarrassed, I didn't say you were (even if embarrassment is an insult at all) Also, please check back to where I answered your question, just above. Imitation, though ,is the sincerest form of flattery, I'll give you that.. But, since we have disposed of your latest diversion, and this last where you are reduced to imitating me, hadn't you better address my question? Your number of refusals must be approaching double figures... Still no answer to my question, and ad hom still noted. I gave an answer - you know, that would be something in reply to a question? Here it is again: "I have never done that". And, once again, asking if someone is embarrassed is not an 'insult'. But I guess ignoring what I say and common sense is now all you have. Thank you though; but I think our exchanges lately have been sufficient now to demonstrate that the faithful have no interest in engaging with the quite reasonable notion that a god which roundly condemns murder may be a moral hypocrite when it also instigates the mass killing of men, women, and children. Or why, if God knows what ought to persuade many more to believe in Him and be brought to salvation, He does not just do it. I have found this before. Unless you have anything fresh to contribute, if you don't mind I will answer you no more on this thread. I will keep an eye on Mr. Hugs and Kisses though, who, although he has lately moved to communicate through emoticons and foreign languages rather than answer any points, even in broken English,, at least doesn't accuse me of bestiality. Your Jesus is proud of you, right? edited : spelling
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 19, 2024 20:58:46 GMT
Basta smettere di prendere tempo. « Nulla certior custodia innocentia »😇
E like me ka mea maʻamau, ʻaʻohe oʻu manaʻo i ke ʻano o ia mea. He mea hilahila ʻaʻole ʻoe e hoʻoikaika nui i ka pane ʻana i kaʻu mau manaʻo. A mahalo akā ʻike wau i ka hoʻomaka ʻana o ka pae.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 19, 2024 22:01:49 GMT
Still no answer to my question, and ad hom still noted. I gave an answer - you know, that's would be something in reply to a question? Here it is again: "I have never done that". Ok then, here's my answer again: "I don't claim that I work in mysterious ways. I know why I parked on the grass. If you know anyone who says God works in mysterious ways to justify his actions and counter the claim of moral hypocrisy, take it up with them." Then you know what it feels like. Are you still flattered? I'm good with that, but before you put your fingers in your ears and cry "la la la, I can't hear you!" (as if you ever stopped)... I parked on the grass because my driveway was being repaved. Not so mysterious after all, eh? " Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools." Romans 1:22 Next time, just say you don't know when you don't know and you won't become a fool. Later.
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 19, 2024 23:36:00 GMT
« Nulla certior custodia innocentia »😇
E like me ka mea maʻamau, ʻaʻohe oʻu manaʻo i ke ʻano o ia mea. He mea hilahila ʻaʻole ʻoe e hoʻoikaika nui i ka pane ʻana i kaʻu mau manaʻo. A mahalo akā ʻike wau i ka hoʻomaka ʻana o ka pae. ”Quaeblam, another one !” imdb2.freeforums.net/thread/329682/theoretical-question💋🥰💕🫂🛋
|
|
|
Post by transfuged on Feb 19, 2024 23:42:53 GMT
Still no answer to my question, and ad hom still noted. I gave an answer - you know, that's would be something in reply to a question? Here it is again: "I have never done that". And, one again, asking if someone is embarrassed is not an 'insult'. But I guess ignoring what I say and common sense is now all you have. Thank you though; but I think our exchanges lately have been sufficient now to demonstrate that the faithful have no interest in engaging with the quite reasonable notion that a god which roundly condemns murder may be a moral hypocrite when it also instigates the mass killing of men, women, and children. Or why, if God knows what ought to persuade many more to believe in Him and be brought to salvation, He does not just do it. I have found this before. Unless you have anything fresh to contribute, if you don't mind I will answer you no more on this thread. I will keep an eye on Mr. Hugs and Kisses though, who, although he has lately moved to communicate through emoticons and foreign languages rather than answer any points, even in broken English,, at least doesn't accuse me of bestiality. Your Jesus is proud of you, right? I’m a she ! 👓 👓 👓👓 👓... We should join and have the eye training session together) -Go get yourself a sheep ! -Well, at last, she would not bleat bitter !( Rob Roy : ) Boys ! I love both of you. (In my language, they refer to a female goat, not sheep, to cross the t and dot the i)
|
|
jimmyboy
Sophomore
@jimmyboy
Posts: 162
Likes: 59
|
Post by jimmyboy on Feb 20, 2024 1:24:21 GMT
Do you believe that bodily autonomy is an absolute right? If your answer is yes then do you believe a woman should be legally allowed to drink and/or do drugs during pregnancy to purposely inflict a disability on the unborn child? On bodily autonomy - yes. I'm not sure if there are any laws on the books on your second question, but a person's rights ends where other person's begins. If the baby will be carried to term it becomes a person, then yes, it should be illegal. If it's going to be aborted, then who cares?
|
|
jimmyboy
Sophomore
@jimmyboy
Posts: 162
Likes: 59
|
Post by jimmyboy on Feb 20, 2024 1:26:34 GMT
I'm sure you won't let it bother you. Any answer to my question yet? See above. Did you ever stop having sex with sheep? (Evasion will be noted.) That sounds like fun on a Saturday for a redneck (a joke).
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 20, 2024 1:29:06 GMT
See above. Did you ever stop having sex with sheep? (Evasion will be noted.) That sounds like fun on a Saturday for a redneck (a joke). Don't forget your hip waders!
|
|
jimmyboy
Sophomore
@jimmyboy
Posts: 162
Likes: 59
|
Post by jimmyboy on Feb 20, 2024 2:15:34 GMT
That sounds like fun on a Saturday for a redneck (a joke). Don't forget your hip waders! If I do forget and don't want to go fetch them, there's always tipping cows......
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 20, 2024 2:39:19 GMT
Don't forget your hip waders! If I do forget and don't want to go fetch them, there's always tipping cows...... Nooooo! Cows are cool. Never tip the cows.
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on Feb 20, 2024 20:00:42 GMT
I gave an answer - you know, that would be something in reply to a question? Here it is again: "I have never done that". And, once again, asking if someone is embarrassed is not an 'insult'. But I guess ignoring what I say and common sense is now all you have. Thank you though; but I think our exchanges lately have been sufficient now to demonstrate that the faithful have no interest in engaging with the quite reasonable notion that a god which roundly condemns murder may be a moral hypocrite when it also instigates the mass killing of men, women, and children. Or why, if God knows what ought to persuade many more to believe in Him and be brought to salvation, He does not just do it. I have found this before. Unless you have anything fresh to contribute, if you don't mind I will answer you no more on this thread. I will keep an eye on Mr. Hugs and Kisses though, who, although he has lately moved to communicate through emoticons and foreign languages rather than answer any points, even in broken English,, at least doesn't accuse me of bestiality. Your Jesus is proud of you, right? I’m a she ! 👓 👓 👓👓 👓... We should join and have the eye training session together) -Go get yourself a sheep !-Well, at last, she would not bleat bitter !( Rob Roy : ) Boys ! I love both of you. (In my language, they refer to a female goat, not sheep, to cross the t and dot the i) An echo of another's more offensive ad hominems (unfortunately and pointlessly still being persisted with, one notes ) is not an argument, either. Once again you here are writing in somewhat mysterious ways ... that, despite what Admin still prefers to think, being something which usually means mysterious ways to others, not oneself! But duh. edited : emphasis
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Feb 20, 2024 21:08:37 GMT
An echo of another's more offensive ad hominems You really should learn what an ad hom is before you accuse anyone of that again. It was a demonstration of a loaded question, offered as a reflection of your own posts. Your acknowledgement of both told me you got the point. But now here you are, burning down yet another one of your own straw men. Let me know when you want discussion instead of an audience. You can find me in the peanut gallery, pointing and laughing. You know, like this...
|
|