|
Post by Catman on Jul 5, 2017 19:29:08 GMT
I'm sure @reelreviews watched Doctor Who series 10 entirely. No question about it. He knows far too much about what happens in each episode to not have. So much for his boycott. He probably used a cat o'nine tails on himself to limit any potential enjoyment.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2017 4:39:26 GMT
I'm sure @reelreviews watched Doctor Who series 10 entirely. No question about it. He knows far too much about what happens in each episode to not have. So much for his boycott. Its called "Using a Wiki."
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jul 7, 2017 21:08:19 GMT
No question about it. He knows far too much about what happens in each episode to not have. So much for his boycott. Its called "Using a Wiki." Using a Wiki to truly understand a movie/TV Show is like looking at a Hustler magazine and understanding about sex.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2017 4:23:56 GMT
Its called "Using a Wiki." Using a Wiki to truly understand a movie/TV Show is like looking at a Hustler magazine and understanding about sex. He's seen plenty of the show prior to Series 10. He understands it from firsthand viewing just fine. As I believe The Doctor would say: Don't be thick.
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jul 8, 2017 10:50:38 GMT
Using a Wiki to truly understand a movie/TV Show is like looking at a Hustler magazine and understanding about sex. He's seen plenty of the show prior to Series 10. He understands it from firsthand viewing just fine. As I believe The Doctor would say: Don't be thick. Then what's the point of watching any show past a few seasons? Get familiar with a show and then jump on Wiki to fully understand what happens next. Do you see how "thick" that sounds?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 8, 2017 23:19:59 GMT
He's seen plenty of the show prior to Series 10. He understands it from firsthand viewing just fine. As I believe The Doctor would say: Don't be thick. Then what's the point of watching any show past a few seasons? Get familiar with a show and then jump on Wiki to fully understand what happens next. Do you see how "thick" that sounds? Because he doesn't like the direction its taking. Sorry you can't live with that, jerk.
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jul 9, 2017 1:09:39 GMT
Then what's the point of watching any show past a few seasons? Get familiar with a show and then jump on Wiki to fully understand what happens next. Do you see how "thick" that sounds? Because he doesn't like the direction its taking. Sorry you can't live with that, jerk. So you had to drop to name calling to attempt to make a point, which doesn't make any sense to begin with. Very nice!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2017 1:22:41 GMT
Because he doesn't like the direction its taking. Sorry you can't live with that, jerk. So you had to drop to name calling to attempt to make a point, which doesn't make any sense to begin with. Very nice! Okay, I'll use small words so even a complete dullard like you can understand. He doesn't like what Moffet is doing with Doctor Who, and so stopped watching. Still with me? I know this part is very difficult for you to understand. But he does keep up with what's happening by reading about it. Still with me? I know you only have one braincell and it doesn't even work properly. What he reads doesn't impress him, and so he continues to stay away. Did I go too fast for you? I tried to keep the training wheels on for you.
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jul 9, 2017 1:28:20 GMT
So you had to drop to name calling to attempt to make a point, which doesn't make any sense to begin with. Very nice! Okay, I'll use small words so even a complete dullard like you can understand. He doesn't like what Moffet is doing with Doctor Who, and so stopped watching. Still with me? I know this part is very difficult for you to understand. But he does keep up with what's happening by reading about it. Still with me? I know you only have one braincell and it doesn't even work properly. What he reads doesn't impress him, and so he continues to stay away. Did I go too fast for you? I tried to keep the training wheels on for you. Again with name calling! So apparently you can't have a reasonable, mature discussion. First, why are you his cheerleader? You seem very knowledgeable and vested into what another poster is thinking. I don't care if he doesn't like Moffet. I don't like Moffet either! Regardless, what does that have to do with reviewing wiki to understand a season of a show. You went completely off the rails. Perhaps you should review the actual posts that your responding to, before you cast aspersions to others. Take your time!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2017 1:30:24 GMT
Okay, I'll use small words so even a complete dullard like you can understand. He doesn't like what Moffet is doing with Doctor Who, and so stopped watching. Still with me? I know this part is very difficult for you to understand. But he does keep up with what's happening by reading about it. Still with me? I know you only have one braincell and it doesn't even work properly. What he reads doesn't impress him, and so he continues to stay away. Did I go too fast for you? I tried to keep the training wheels on for you. Again with name calling! So apparently you can't have a reasonable, mature discussion. First, why are you his cheerleader? You seem very knowledgeable and vested into what another poster is thinking. I don't care if he doesn't like Moffet. I don't like Moffet either! Regardless, what does that have to do with reviewing wiki to understand a season of a show. You went completely off the rails. Perhaps you should review the actual posts that your responding to, before you cast aspersions to others. Take your time! I'm not. My point is that no one actually HAS to have seen the latest episode of a show to know what happens in it. This is the age of the internet, genius. Figure it out.
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jul 9, 2017 1:54:13 GMT
Again with name calling! So apparently you can't have a reasonable, mature discussion. First, why are you his cheerleader? You seem very knowledgeable and vested into what another poster is thinking. I don't care if he doesn't like Moffet. I don't like Moffet either! Regardless, what does that have to do with reviewing wiki to understand a season of a show. You went completely off the rails. Perhaps you should review the actual posts that your responding to, before you cast aspersions to others. Take your time! I'm not. My point is that no one actually HAS to have seen the latest episode of a show to know what happens in it. This is the age of the internet, genius. Figure it out. You're not......what? A cheerleader?! Maybe you're not, but you seem to be extremely vested in what someone else thinks and why they think it. If you think that reading a Wiki description or somebody else's synopsis of a movie/TV show is exactly the same thing as actually watching the show for yourself and forming your own unique option on the matter....then, you need to figure out what you're actually missing. Different people have different views on a variety of things. That's OK, but make those choices for yourself and don't be lead by the nose by someone else. If you're going to allow someone else to tell you if something is bad or good (without gaining first-hand knowledge), then knock yourself out. Just don't judge those that have a differing opinion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2017 2:01:41 GMT
I'm not. My point is that no one actually HAS to have seen the latest episode of a show to know what happens in it. This is the age of the internet, genius. Figure it out. You're not......what? A cheerleader?! Maybe you're not, but you seem to be extremely vested in what someone else thinks and why they think it. If you think that reading a Wiki description or somebody else's synopsis of a movie/TV show is exactly the same thing as actually watching the show for yourself and forming your own unique option on the matter....then, you need to figure out what you're actually missing. Different people have different views on a variety of things. That's OK, but make those choices for yourself and don't be lead by the nose by someone else. If you're going to allow someone else to tell you if something is bad or good (without gaining first-hand knowledge), then knock yourself out. Just don't judge those that have a differing opinion. Wrong yet again. You'd have been benched by now if this was a ball game. Actually, just reading up on what happened on a TV show is a perfectly fine way to gauge if you approve of it. "That's OK, but make those choices for yourself and don't be lead by the nose by someone else." First of all: fuck you. I'm not lead around by anyone. I do make my own decisions, so you can just fuck right off and stay there, wanker. I'm not letting anyone tell me what to enjoy or not. If I want to find out what happened secondhand, that's my choice. I don't need to see most of Colin Baker's run to know how bad it was based on what I've read about it. So again, you can fuck right off.
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jul 9, 2017 2:13:00 GMT
You're not......what? A cheerleader?! Maybe you're not, but you seem to be extremely vested in what someone else thinks and why they think it. If you think that reading a Wiki description or somebody else's synopsis of a movie/TV show is exactly the same thing as actually watching the show for yourself and forming your own unique option on the matter....then, you need to figure out what you're actually missing. Different people have different views on a variety of things. That's OK, but make those choices for yourself and don't be lead by the nose by someone else. If you're going to allow someone else to tell you if something is bad or good (without gaining first-hand knowledge), then knock yourself out. Just don't judge those that have a differing opinion. Wrong yet again. You'd have been benched by now if this was a ball game. Actually, just reading up on what happened on a TV show is a perfectly fine way to gauge if you approve of it. "That's OK, but make those choices for yourself and don't be lead by the nose by someone else." First of all: fuck you. I'm not lead around by anyone. I do make my own decisions, so you can just fuck right off and stay there, wanker. I'm not letting anyone tell me what to enjoy or not. If I want to find out what happened secondhand, that's my choice. I don't need to see most of Colin Baker's run to know how bad it was based on what I've read about it. So again, you can fuck right off. I'm sorry that you seem so immature. I'm sorry that you can't exchange ideas without calling people names and cursing. I'm also sorry that you miss out on finding out things for yourself. If that's what makes you content, then....once again, knock yourself out. You can either prove me wrong by having a reasonable exchange of ideas...or dropping the matter at this point. Either way, I hope you enjoy the next season of your favorite shows...either directly or by someone else's opinion!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2017 2:21:52 GMT
Wrong yet again. You'd have been benched by now if this was a ball game. Actually, just reading up on what happened on a TV show is a perfectly fine way to gauge if you approve of it. "That's OK, but make those choices for yourself and don't be lead by the nose by someone else." First of all: fuck you. I'm not lead around by anyone. I do make my own decisions, so you can just fuck right off and stay there, wanker. I'm not letting anyone tell me what to enjoy or not. If I want to find out what happened secondhand, that's my choice. I don't need to see most of Colin Baker's run to know how bad it was based on what I've read about it. So again, you can fuck right off. I'm sorry that you seem so immature. I'm sorry that you can't exchange ideas without calling people names and cursing. I'm also sorry that you miss out on finding out things for yourself. If that's what makes you content, then....once again, knock yourself out. You can either prove me wrong by having a reasonable exchange of ideas...or dropping the matter at this point. Either way, I hope you enjoy the next season of your favorite shows...either directly or by someone else's opinion! Sod off. You're not trying to exchange ideas with me. You're talking down to me and I won't put up with it. I don't need to prove you wrong, because I would care less about your approval. Its less than meaningless.
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on Jul 9, 2017 2:41:53 GMT
I'm sorry that you seem so immature. I'm sorry that you can't exchange ideas without calling people names and cursing. I'm also sorry that you miss out on finding out things for yourself. If that's what makes you content, then....once again, knock yourself out. You can either prove me wrong by having a reasonable exchange of ideas...or dropping the matter at this point. Either way, I hope you enjoy the next season of your favorite shows...either directly or by someone else's opinion! Sod off. You're not trying to exchange ideas with me. You're talking down to me and I won't put up with it. I don't need to prove you wrong, because I would care less about your approval. Its less than meaningless. I'm not trying to talk down to you at all. At no time was I the one to call you names, curse or tell you to "sod off." I'm also not asking for your (or anyone's) approval for anything. I'm sorry that you feel that way! Do you realize that this entire conversation consists of: Me saying that the real method for having first-hand knowledge of something.....is to actually have first hand knowledge of something. This is in response to you saying...to have first-hand knowledge of something, you can sometimes rely on second-hand knowledge of something. Do you not see why the point of this conversation is really what's silly and meaningless? If I misinterpreted the information that you're trying to convey, then I guess that's on me!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2017 3:43:03 GMT
Sod off. You're not trying to exchange ideas with me. You're talking down to me and I won't put up with it. I don't need to prove you wrong, because I would care less about your approval. Its less than meaningless. I'm not trying to talk down to you at all. At no time was I the one to call you names, curse or tell you to "sod off." I'm also not asking for your (or anyone's) approval for anything. I'm sorry that you feel that way! Do you realize that this entire conversation consists of: Me saying that the real method for having first-hand knowledge of something.....is to actually have first hand knowledge of something. This is in response to you saying...to have first-hand knowledge of something, you can sometimes rely on second-hand knowledge of something. Do you not see why the point of this conversation is really what's silly and meaningless? If I misinterpreted the information that you're trying to convey, then I guess that's on me! There is no real method. Reading about a show is more than enough to tell someone if they'll like it or not. I don't have to watch every show I've ever heard of to decide if I'm interested. Yes, any conversation with you is silly and meaningless. I don't need first-hand knowledge to know the series jumped the shark when they decided every companion The Doctor ever had ended up as a Cyberman thanks to "Missy."
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 13, 2017 17:27:29 GMT
Steven Moffat's run was astonishingly good. It's a shame his last season was just a blatant left wing political agenda designed to brainwash young viewers. Viewers don't want to be preached to, so it's no wonder the ratings have crashed and burned. I hope the new show runner puts the show back on course.
'Left wing political agenda'? What on earth are you talking about?
The ratings crashed and burned because it was a bad season, with barely even one decent episode. A wasted opportunity, one they can't afford too often, as shows are easily cancelled. Again.
|
|
reelreviews2
Sophomore
Jon Stewart HIJACKED The Daily Show. We're taking it BACK.
@reelreviews2
Posts: 258
Likes: 105
|
Post by reelreviews2 on Jul 15, 2017 7:40:33 GMT
Steven Moffat's run was astonishingly good. It's a shame his last season was just a blatant left wing political agenda designed to brainwash young viewers. Viewers don't want to be preached to, so it's no wonder the ratings have crashed and burned. I hope the new show runner puts the show back on course.
'Left wing political agenda'? What on earth are you talking about?
The ratings crashed and burned because it was a bad season, with barely even one decent episode. A wasted opportunity, one they can't afford too often, as shows are easily cancelled. Again.
It was indeed an awful season with zero good episodes, but it was made even WORSE by the constant left-wing agenda. What was he talking about? "Bill" reminding everyone she's a lesbian in EVERY episode, for starters. The anti-capitalism episode "Oxygen". The endless attempts to force "diversity" and claim you're racist if you point out the UK doesn't nearly have as many "minorities" as they cast on the show. Imagine if the reverse happened and they invented a new companion who spent every episode reminding people he's a devout Christian who goes to church every Sunday, had an entire episode devoted to promoting Brexit, and had a "special guest appearance" from former President George W. Bush as a masterful UNIT leader who saves earth from the Daleks? Then when people who weren't hardcore conservatives complained, the BBC would shrug their shoulders are go "what right-wing bias? We're just showing the UK as it is in the 21st century".
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jul 16, 2017 11:19:19 GMT
"Left-wing agenda" = uppity negroes/homos/foreigners who don't know their place. I shouldn't really expect anything else from the English language internet. This IMDb is just as bad as the other one, I rather foolishly hoped it wouldn't be. You've also foolishly projected your own racist, bigoted thoughts onto this thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2017 15:12:28 GMT
Indeed, that's precisely what I decided to BOYCOTT "series 10" from day one. I KNEW the entire season would be worthless Social Justice Warrior propaganda. I have now been PROVEN right. Too bad many Doctor Who fans did not heed my warning. You should take your one-man boycott further and stop talking about it, too. That'll show them!
|
|