|
Post by hehatesshe on Jul 10, 2017 23:32:03 GMT
this doesn't show the 9.5 It doesn't show the 9.5 because I rated it a 6. Like I said before, it's impossible to rate a movie 9.5 on IMDb. you also gave the atrocious Suicide Squad a 9.5 No, I rated Suicide Squad a 3. Like I said before, I'm always unbiased and fair with my ratings. After seeing AH_Fan ignore his own review to deny what we all know is true, I am now 100% heterosexually convinced that he met Klaw in a bar, that he is a tiny ginger of a man, and that he admitted that he is just trolling. If you are going to lie about something we saw you post, and ignore your own review to double down, you lose all benefit of the doubt.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 11, 2017 2:04:08 GMT
He is lying. I remember those reviews very well because he is one of the only people on Earth who thought those movies were good at all. Nope, I'm not lying. klawrencio is lying. But if you believe klawrencio's lies, then PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME HOW TO RATE MOVIES ON IMDb WITH A DECIMAL POINT BECAUSE I SURE LIKE TO DO THAT BUT I HAVEN'T FOUND A WAY TO DO THAT YET.
|
|
|
Post by damngumby on Jul 11, 2017 10:01:55 GMT
Who are you talking to, champ? Everyone here knows you are lying. It's not up for debate.
And to think ... after all those hours spent angrily defending BvS ... insisting that it's a great movie ... you just throw it all away. We all know your posts are worthless drivel. Its nice to see that you agree.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 11, 2017 11:09:17 GMT
I saw the first 3 MCU movies in the theaters, but they were so awful that I stopped watching MCU movies in theaters and had watched all MCU movies since then online. But with the hype surrounding Spider-Man: Homecoming, I decided to give it a chance and watch it in a theater. (Plus, I had to take my car in for emergency service and the theater is only a block from the service shop so I decided to sit in an air-conditioned movie theater for a couple of hours while my car was being serviced.) With the hype surrounding Spider-Man: Homecoming, I thought MCU might have finally made their 1st decent movie. But once again, the hype is just another case of an awful MCU movie being over-rated. The movie started with a TV broadcast of the Chitauri invasion (in The Avengers) in 2012. Then in said "8 Years Later" and that's when the events of this movie begin. So is MCU saying that this movie actually takes place in the future, in 2020?
The 1st 10 minutes of the movie basically consists of shaky camcorder footage, like in The Blair Witch Project and Project Almanac. I hate shaky camcorder footage in movies because it always gives me vertigo. They spent $175 million to make this movie and the best they can do is give us 10 minutes of shaky camcorder footage? WTF?
Then the next 10 minutes consists of showing Peter Parker in physics class, then having lunch with his best friend at the geeks-only table, then in debate club, etc. We already know this movie is going to be a high school comedy. There's no need to waste 10 minutes of our time showing a day in the life of Peter Parker attending high school.
And why the hell was the gym teacher showing an instruction video of Captain America to his students? After Civil War, Captain America is a wanted criminal. No high school would allow a teacher to show an instruction video of a wanted criminal to students. It would be like a high school allowing the football coach to show members of the football team an instruction video of O.J. Simpson.
The movie is basically a high school comedy that uses the standard plot of a geeky and not very popular high school kid wanting to become part of the "cool crowd" (in this case, the "cool crowd" that Peter Parker wants to become a part of is The Avengers) but in the end realizes that he doesn't need to become part of the "cool crowd" after all. We've seen that standard plot done before and done better in Can't Buy Me Love as well as plenty of other high school movies.
And we've also seen several superheroes-in-high-school movies recently (e.g. Sky High, Kick-Ass, Kick-Ass 2, Max Steel, and Power Rangers). So nothing original here.
I didn't think it was possible to make a Spider-Man movie that's worse than the two Amazing Spider-Man movies, but MCU somehow managed to do that. SMH is even worse than the two Amazing Spider-Man movies. Rating: 1 out of 10. Spider-Man II (Tobey Maguire) = greatest super hero flick of all-time
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jul 11, 2017 11:46:51 GMT
He is lying. I remember those reviews very well because he is one of the only people on Earth who thought those movies were good at all. Nope, I'm not lying. klawrencio is lying. But if you believe klawrencio's lies, then PLEASE EXPLAIN TO ME HOW TO RATE MOVIES ON IMDb WITH A DECIMAL POINT BECAUSE I SURE LIKE TO DO THAT BUT I HAVEN'T FOUND A WAY TO DO THAT YET. I am not talking about your IMDB review. I am talking about you on the message boards giving a 9.5 out of 10 to BvS, when that movie was hot garbage. I am actually unbiased. I gave it a 5/10. It had its redeeming qualities. I thought Wonder Woman was great and Batfleck was great. The writing and editing were terrible. The score for all of DCEU is terrible too.
|
|
|
Post by shadyvsesham on Jul 11, 2017 12:09:27 GMT
My mistake, it was that timeless classic WONDER WOMAN that received a perfect score. Wonder Woman is #2 (behind only Logan) on RT's list of the 50 best superhero movies of all time: 50 Best Superhero Movies of All Time. So the 10/10 rating for Wonder Woman is well-deserved.
So, it is fair to rate Wonder Woman a 10. Meanwhile the movie it was behind, Logan, you rated a 2. That was well-deserved right? No one believes your unbiased BS. You use the "50 best superhero movies of all time" say Wonder Woman 10 is "well-deserved" meanwhile, you gave Logan a 2....smh. Edit - I wasnt there, but Ill roll with the people who said you rated BVS a 9.5. (Yes, on IMDB you cant rate a movie a 8.5/9.5/7.8, so you probably just hit the "10" button and rounded up.) I believe you gave SS a 9.5 to. It's your MO, youre not unbiased, noticed everyone here is saying youre not but you. So the issue is everyone else, right? Again, Wonder Woman is a 10, but the movie who beat it Logan, a 2, but WW review was "well-deserved." Im sorry, no one is believing the BS reviews you write. My best advice, dont rate MCU/DC films, stick to reviewing everything but those because you just dont have the credibility to write them. Also seeing Klaw post that review...BVS was the best movie eva, but now it's a 6. Yea, "everyone" believes you gave it a "6." LOL I gave BVS either a 6/7, I wanted to go 6.5, but I know fanboys rate DC/MCU films lower so I went with I think a 7 but I really think 6.5 BVS was kind of a mess, it wasnt the worst movie ever, but there were a lot of stupid things.....MARTHA!
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 11, 2017 14:49:32 GMT
I saw the first 3 MCU movies in the theaters, but they were so awful that I stopped watching MCU movies in theaters and had watched all MCU movies since then online. But with the hype surrounding Spider-Man: Homecoming, I decided to give it a chance and watch it in a theater. (Plus, I had to take my car in for emergency service and the theater is only a block from the service shop so I decided to sit in an air-conditioned movie theater for a couple of hours while my car was being serviced.) With the hype surrounding Spider-Man: Homecoming, I thought MCU might have finally made their 1st decent movie. But once again, the hype is just another case of an awful MCU movie being over-rated. The movie started with a TV broadcast of the Chitauri invasion (in The Avengers) in 2012. Then in said "8 Years Later" and that's when the events of this movie begin. So is MCU saying that this movie actually takes place in the future, in 2020?
The 1st 10 minutes of the movie basically consists of shaky camcorder footage, like in The Blair Witch Project and Project Almanac. I hate shaky camcorder footage in movies because it always gives me vertigo. They spent $175 million to make this movie and the best they can do is give us 10 minutes of shaky camcorder footage? WTF?
Then the next 10 minutes consists of showing Peter Parker in physics class, then having lunch with his best friend at the geeks-only table, then in debate club, etc. We already know this movie is going to be a high school comedy. There's no need to waste 10 minutes of our time showing a day in the life of Peter Parker attending high school.
And why the hell was the gym teacher showing an instruction video of Captain America to his students? After Civil War, Captain America is a wanted criminal. No high school would allow a teacher to show an instruction video of a wanted criminal to students. It would be like a high school allowing the football coach to show members of the football team an instruction video of O.J. Simpson.
The movie is basically a high school comedy that uses the standard plot of a geeky and not very popular high school kid wanting to become part of the "cool crowd" (in this case, the "cool crowd" that Peter Parker wants to become a part of is The Avengers) but in the end realizes that he doesn't need to become part of the "cool crowd" after all. We've seen that standard plot done before and done better in Can't Buy Me Love as well as plenty of other high school movies.
And we've also seen several superheroes-in-high-school movies recently (e.g. Sky High, Kick-Ass, Kick-Ass 2, Max Steel, and Power Rangers). So nothing original here.
I didn't think it was possible to make a Spider-Man movie that's worse than the two Amazing Spider-Man movies, but MCU somehow managed to do that. SMH is even worse than the two Amazing Spider-Man movies. Rating: 1 out of 10. Spider-Man II (Tobey Maguire) = greatest super hero flick of all-time Spider-Man 2 is the best Spider-Man movie ever, definitely better than Spider-Man: Homecoming. I have Spider-Man 2 in my all-time top 10 (and possibly top 5) superhero movies.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 11, 2017 15:08:47 GMT
I wasnt there, but Ill roll with the people who said you rated BVS a 9.5. (Yes, on IMDB you cant rate a movie a 8.5/9.5/7.8, so you probably just hit the "10" button and rounded up.) Nope, I rated BvS a 6 out of 10 on IMDb. I believe you gave SS a 9.5 to. Nope, I rated SS a 3 out of 10 on IMDb. So the issue is everyone else, right? It's easy to verify. My ratings are still on IMDb. seeing Klaw post that review...BVS was the best movie eva You must read too well. I believe it says "1 of the best CBMs ever made", not "the best movie eva". I've seen 67 superhero movies starting with Superman: The Movie in 1978. I haven't rated all 67 on IMDB yet (it's 1 of the things on my To-Do list), but of the superhero movies that I have rated on IMDB so far, only 4 are rated higher than 6 out of 10. So yes, it does qualify as being "1 of the best CBMs ever made" since I've only rated 4 out of 67 superhero movies higher. there were a lot of stupid things.....MARTHA! Civil War was worse: Captain America: "I'm from Brooklyn." Spider-Man: "I'm from Queens." Captain America: "Really, kid? We're from the same city? WOW! Then we should stop fighting since we're practically neighbors." Stops fighting and walks away in the middle of the fight. Iron Man: "I know that Steve and Bucky are going to show up at the airport to hijack a quinjet to make their escape. So being the strategic genius that I am, I'm going to set up a fool-proof trap for them that they can't escape from. And my fool-proof trap is to call in a high school kid who can shoot spiderwebs from his wrists to come down from the roof. Yep, that's my fool-proof plan and it's not going to fail because I'm a strategic genius." Zemo: "The Avengers killed my family. But even though I know all of their identities, I'm not going to do the logical thing and go after their families and loved ones. Instead, I'm going to come up with the most convoluted scheme in CBM history where I find the only copy of a videotape of Bucky killing Tony Stark's parents 25 years ago. And then instead of uploading the video to the Internet for the whole world to see that Bucky is a murderer, I'm going to wait for Iron Man, Captain America, and Bucky to all show up at a remote base in the middle of nowhere at the same time (which I know will happen because I read the script for this crappy movie and the writers wrote it in the script) so they can watch the videotape together."
|
|
|
Post by shadyvsesham on Jul 11, 2017 15:44:58 GMT
Ok... DC-FanFirst, I am sorry but I find DSDSquared an honest person. Why would he make up what he said? Next, klawrencio79 posted your review on IMDB of the film. We will get into that, but you notice no one believes you? Your name is "DC-Fan." Youve shown you dont like MCU, and hey, that's ok. I like both franchises. I think Marvel makes better on a whole, but I think when DC knocks one out the park, they knock it out the park. Ill use baseball. Marvel is hitting doubles and triples while DC strikes out and hits a home run. DC is like Jeff Bagwell and Marvel is Biggio. (Im from Houston). Bagwell struck out more but had more power, Biggio got on base more, but not power. My favorite comic book movie of all time is the Dark Knight, but if I listed my top 10 comic book movies, Id guess Id name 6 marvel to 4 DC. I like them both though. Batman (Adam West - Series and Movie), the first 2 Batman movies with Keaton (Screw Kilmer/Clooney), Dark Knight trilogy, all great. I wasnt big on BVS. Spider man (Tobey) I thought was good (Last one was a mess, 2 was the best). Xmen also great (Wasnt big on the 3rd one again, lets just kill of people!) I love Fantastic four but man the films have been ugh. Wasnt big on Daredevil. I liked the Avengers stuff. GOTG imho was such an under-rated hit. I went in with massively low expectations and it was a fantastic movie. My 2 favorite super heroes? Spider Man and Superman. So I AM UNBIASED. Maybe you did later, but I believe, seeing how you are, you did rate it a 9.5 ON THE IMDB MESSAGE BOARD. Dude, people can change their minds on films. When I first watched Fight Club I thought it was stupid now it's my favorite all time movie. I liked Forest Gump and Pulp fiction and felt Gump deserved the Oscar. Now....I think Pulp is the superior movie. No shame in changing your mind. Look at that review you wrote. "The critics who gave BvS a low rating definitely got it wrong. Despite its flaws, BvS is still definitely better than any of the Marvel Studios movies that most critics always get an orgasm over. BvS presents a thought-provoking analysis of justice, absolute power, accountability, and the actions of and reaction to superheroes in a real-world environment. The 1st CBM I ever saw was Superman: The Movie in 1978. Since then, I've seen over 50 CBMs and I have to say that BvS is 1 of the best CBMs ever made."So one of the best films you've ever seen is a 6? If something doesnt add up, it probably isnt true. Everyone else is saying differently....why? It's very easy to change a rating on IMDB. I could change one right now if I so desired. You know where I was coming from (Well you might not, other will), in the end,"one of the best CBMs ever made." and that's a 6!? See how what youre saying doesnt add up? And before you rated them, DSDSquared predicted how youd rate them...AND HE WAS FN RIGHT. He was right on the dang button. "Wonder Woman: 10/10Justice League: 10/10 Guardians of the Galaxy 2: 1/10Spiderman Homecoming: 1/10Thor 3: 1/10" You cant predict the other 2, as they havent come out. He knew exactly how youd rate them and he was 110 percent right. Not only that, you rated Logan a 2, which by even the RT post you made, the critics said Logan > WW. You, that justifies your high rating for WW, but didnt comment on Logan at all. Yea, but youll rate that movie a "1" and BVS a "6" (9.5)
|
|
|
Post by klawrencio79 on Jul 11, 2017 17:31:51 GMT
Right on cue, now that he's been thoroughly and irrevocably humiliated, he'll abandon the thread. It's as predictable as my morning post-coffee shit.
|
|
|
Post by DC-Fan on Jul 11, 2017 17:39:50 GMT
I find DSDSquared an honest person. Why would he make up what he said? You'll have to ask him what his motivations are for lying. Perhaps he's just mistaken and is too embarrassed to public admit it. That could also be the reason why Brady refused to admit that he ordered Jim "The Deflator" McNally to deflate the footballs for him. Maybe Brady wanted Jim "The Deflator" McNally to deflate the footballs just a little under the limit, but Jim "The Deflator" McNally got carried away and deflated the footballs too much and Brady was too embarrassed to admit that he ordered Jim "The Deflator" McNally to deflate the footballs for him. So Brady chose to deny and lie instead. And klawrencio even admitted that review doesn't contain any 9.5 rating. Moreover, you and dumb-ass klawrencio keep hanging onto the "1 of the best CBMs ever made" and assume that I must have rated it 9.5 based on that quote. But you conveniently forgot the very 1st line of the review says "First, the negatives:" and that's followed by the negatives. Wouldn't you agree that a movie that's rated 9.5 out of 10 would basically have no negatives? Yet I listed some negatives in my review (for a movie that was supposedly rated a 9.5). So that proves klawrencio and DSDSquared are lying. And like I said many times before, the DC in my username stands for Dallas Cowboys, which is why my avatar is the Dallas Cowboys star. And before you accuse me of lying about being a Cowboys fan, I think I've written enough pro-Cowboys posts to prove that I've always been a Cowboys fan. Ill use baseball. Marvel is hitting doubles and triples while DC strikes out and hits a home run. DC is like Jeff Bagwell and Marvel is Biggio. (Im from Houston). Bagwell struck out more but had more power, Biggio got on base more, but not power. I wrote a post saying basically the same thing awhile back. See my June 13 post here: imdb2.freeforums.net/thread/34245/marvel-films-wonder-woman?page=2"that's the whole point of this thread titled "Marvel films I think Wonder Woman is better than". DC got it right with Wonder Woman and the general consensus is that Wonder Woman is better than all of MCU's movies.
Basically, we can say that MCU hits for average while DCEU hits for power. MCU might have a higher batting average but all their hits are only singles while DCEU might have a lower batting average but when DCEU gets a hit, it's usually a home run. So the question is which do you prefer, a singles hitter (like a Pete Rose) or a slugger (like a Babe Ruth)? I would choose a Babe Ruth over a Pete Rose."My favorite comic book movie of all time is the Dark Knight, but if I listed my top 10 comic book movies, Id guess Id name 6 marvel to 4 DC. I like them both though. Batman (Adam West - Series and Movie), the first 2 Batman movies with Keaton (Screw Kilmer/Clooney), Dark Knight trilogy, all great. I wasnt big on BVS. Spider man (Tobey) I thought was good (Last one was a mess, 2 was the best). Xmen also great (Wasnt big on the 3rd one again, lets just kill of people!) I love Fantastic four but man the films have been ugh. Wasnt big on Daredevil. I liked the Avengers stuff. GOTG imho was such an under-rated hit. I went in with massively low expectations and it was a fantastic movie. My 2 favorite super heroes? Spider Man and Superman. So I AM UNBIASED. I'm also unbiased. Like I said before, I've seen 67 superhero movies starting with Superman: The Movie in 1978. I haven't gotten around to rating all of them on IMDb yet (that's 1 of the things on my To-Do list), but I can say the following: Superman: The Movie and Superman II were great. Superman III, Superman IV, and Supergirl not great. I like X2: X-Men United, X-Men: First Class, X-Men: Days of Future Past, and even X-Men: Apocalypse. Didn't like X-Men: The Last Stand because that 1) that was a weak adaptation of the Dark Phoenix Saga (I'm hoping X-Men: Dark Phoenix in 2018 will be much better) and 2) they kill off Cyclops in the 1st 5 minutes and kill of Professor X halfway through the movie and make the movie about Wolverine, whom I've never liked as a character. Spider-Man and Spider-Man 2 were great. Still the 2 best Spider-Man movies. Swamp Thing, Daredevil, Elektra, the 3 Punisher movies, and the 2 Ghost Rider movies weren't good. The Dark Knight Trilogy was great. I liked the 1st 2 Fantastic Four movies (starring Ioan Gruffud and Jessica Alba), but the 2015 reboot (starring Miles Teller and Kate Mara) was just awful. Didn't like X-Men: Wolverine, The Wolverine, or Logan because (like I said before) I've never liked the Wolverine character. Didn't like Deadpool either - it was just a silly movie. MCU movies - they're over-rated, awful, and crappy. Agent Carter wasn't good and Agents of SHIELD is even worse. I watched the pilot episode of Agents of SHIELD and it was crappy so I stopped watching it. Daredevil, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist Netflix series were good, but Jessica Jones is a really boring snoozefest. With Agents of SHIELD, at least I made it through the entire pilot episode and then stopped watching. With Jessica Jones, it was so boring and crappy, I initially stopped halfway through the pilot episode. Later I decided to give it another chance and watch the remainder of the pilot episode to see if it would get better in the 2nd half. But it didn't, it still sucked so I stopped watching it. DCEU movies - Man of Steel I rated a 7 out of 10. BvS I rated a 6 out of 10. Suicide Squad I rated a 3 out of 10. Wonder Woman I rated a 10 out of 10. Wonder Woman is better than all of the MCU movies and is in my top 5 superhero movies of all time. Wonder Woman has the right balance between the lighter moments (Diana and Steve talking on the boat ride to London, Diana shopping for civilian clothes, Diana and Steve dancing in the snow) and the more serious moments (the No Man's Land scene, scenes of injured soldiers with amputated limbs, and the scene of women and children killed by the poisonous gas). That's something that MCU still has figured out how to do right after 16 movies. MCU is well-known for trivializing war and people getting injured or killed with ill-timed jokes and 1-liners (if MCU made Wonder Woman, the entire No Man's Land scene would've been filled with bad jokes and 1-liners). And non-DC, non-Marvel movies - Sky High and the 2 Kick-Ass movies were entertaining. Power Rangers was mediocre. Max Steel was boring. you did rate it a 9.5 ON THE IMDB MESSAGE BOARD. Nope, the IMDb movie ratings system doesn't allow users to use decimal points in their movie ratings (if they do, I haven't found a way to do it yet). I rated BvS a 6 out of 10 on IMDb. My rating is still there on IMDb so it's very easy to verify. When I first watched Fight Club I thought it was stupid now it's my favorite all time movie. I liked Forest Gump and Pulp fiction and felt Gump deserved the Oscar. Now....I think Pulp is the superior movie. I never saw Fight Club or Pulp Fiction so I can't give an opinion on those 2 movies. Look at that review you wrote. "The critics who gave BvS a low rating definitely got it wrong. Despite its flaws, BvS is still definitely better than any of the Marvel Studios movies that most critics always get an orgasm over. BvS presents a thought-provoking analysis of justice, absolute power, accountability, and the actions of and reaction to superheroes in a real-world environment. The 1st CBM I ever saw was Superman: The Movie in 1978. Since then, I've seen over 50 CBMs and I have to say that BvS is 1 of the best CBMs ever made."So one of the best films you've ever seen is a 6? If something doesnt add up, it probably isnt true. Like I said, you conveniently forgot the very 1st line of the review says "First, the negatives:" and that's followed by the negatives. So a movie that's rated 9.5 has several negatives? If something doesn't add up, it probably isn't true, right? Everyone else is saying differently....why? MCU fans were saying a couple months before Wonder Woman was released that the movie is "a complete mess"....why? Probably because MCU fans like to lie. "one of the best CBMs ever made." and that's a 6!? See how what youre saying doesnt add up? Like I said, you conveniently forgot the very 1st line of the review says "First, the negatives:" and that's followed by the negatives. So a movie that has several negatives, that's a 9.5? See how that you're saying doesn't add up? before you rated them, DSDSquared predicted how youd rate them...AND HE WAS FN RIGHT. He was right on the dang button. "Wonder Woman: 10/10The initial RT reviews for Wonder Woman were posted before the movie was released and Wonder Woman already had a higher pre-release RT rating than any MCU movie except Iron Man so it's not hard to predict that my rating for Wonder Woman would be consistent with the high pre-release RT rating for Wonder Woman. It's like before this past NBA season, I predicted that the Warriors would win the NBA Championship. I'm also predicting the Warriors will win the NBA Championship in 2018. Well, given that the Warriors had won the NBA Championship in 2015, and won 73 games and just lost the NBA Finals by 1 game in 2016, and signed Kevin Durant, it wasn't hard to predict that the Warriors would win the NBA Championship. Justice League: 10/10 Thor 3: 1/10 I haven't seen Justice League or Thor 3 yet so I can't rate them yet because I'm always unbiased and fair and never rate a movie until after I've seen it. you rated Logan a 2, which by even the RT post you made, the critics said Logan > WW. You, that justifies your high rating for WW, but didnt comment on Logan at all.
Like I said, I've never liked the Wolverine character. And even though I like most of the X-Men movies, the worst part is that they always try to cram Wolverine down our throats.
X-Men: The Last Stand - It's supposed to be an adaptation of the Dark Phoenix Saga (which Jean Grey and Scot Summers are supposed to be the main characters), but they kill of Cyclops in the 1st 5 minutes and make Wolverine the main character.
X-Men: Days of Future Past - the comic book story had Kitty Pryde going back in time to try to change the past and Wolverine was just a minor character, but the movie once again makes Wolverine the main character.
So my rating for Logan is mainly due to Fox cramming Wolverine down our throats too much. The X-Men have many other more interesting characters, yet they keep cramming Wolverine (and now Deadpool) down our throats.
Yea, but youll rate that movie a "1" and BVS a "6" Civil War was an awful movie full of bad, contrived writing. BvS is much better than Civil War.
|
|
|
Post by shadyvsesham on Jul 11, 2017 18:27:35 GMT
Only issue is....a few people are agreeing with him. So everyone is lying against you? That's one hell of a conspiracy! How does everything go back to Brady. We are discussing MCU and DC, not Brady. Im not trying to be rude, but you almost come across as a closet Brady fan or have a crush on the man. Every dang time, you bring it to Brady, on any issue too. "Man....I like Texans this year." BRADY CHEATED! "Logan or WW, what was better." BRADY CHEATED Ok, got it, regardless he has 5 rings, no asterisk. You scream asterisk, and when asked to shown an asterisk next to one of his SBowl wins, you cant, why, because it doesnt exist. Regardless, this has nada to do with Tom. BECAUSE THEY ALL SAID IT WAS IN THE IMDB FORUMS, you know, the ones that got closed down! Do you grasp how to read? They said you gave it the 9.5 in the forum. Your 6 doesnt even match up with the review, it isnt logical. Again I gave BVS a 6.5, but gave it a 7 on IMDB, as for your "6" rating, you could have easily changed it. That big 2 negatives to your 6 positives, and your negatives were minor af. "I didnt like Lex." "I didnt like one scene" ONE MINOR LITTLE SCENE, that lasted...5-10 minutes, LOL. WOW...WHAT NEGATIVES! No No movie is perfect, Shawshank and Godfather are the top 2 rated movies on IMDB, and I know I can come up with some BABY MINOR GRIPEs with both movies, and that's all you had with BVS, baby minor gripes. And youre clearly a DC fanboy, so, it is a good name for you. You like Dallas, you like DC comics, probably the one clever thing you did, is your sn. No, youre a Cowboys fan. I dont lie like you do. I say Im a Houston fan, but you think I love NE because I respect Brady, which is beyond goofy. Depends, I prefer to have both, why? You need guys like Rose to get on base. Now Ruths homerun turns into two runs, not one. Regardless, your actions dont show that. Logan a 2 GOTG 1 and 2 you rated a 1 SM Homecoming a 1. You hate Iron Man, Avengers, etc etc etc. So your actions/words speak differently. You dont come across unbiased man. Not when DSD could predict how you'd rate 3 movies, and he is batting a 1.000. OK, you like XMen. Still gave Logan a 2, when even the site you gave out said Logan > WW. Great, but the Superman movies you love, were "okay." Id take XMen or Spider man 1-2 over them. One was good, not great. 2 is my favorite film 3, idk it was good/stupid all in one. It isnt a bad movie, but 2 is by far the best in that. I think all the F4 movies have been extremely underwhelming. Deadpool was a lot of fun. Logan > WW, by the site you gave. Problem with DC is they put too much into 3 characters. Superman/Batman/Wonder Woman. Finally theyre making a JJ movie, but they seem to be copying Avengers. Now youre biases is showing through. No, theyre not. GOTG was awesome. Deadpool was fun af. Avengers, great movie. MCU has more characters > DC. MCU still makes better movies in a whole. Which is why the site you gave out said Logan > WW. Again, youre gonna be biased towards DC, it's hard to take it seriously. *Face palm* MESSAGE BOARD. LIKE WE ARE DOING NOW. You know, the boards IMDB closed down. You just wrote 9.5 omg I did too! See how easy it is to DO ON A MESSAGE BOARD. They werent talking about the official IMDB rankings, theyre obviously were discussing what you rated it ON THE MESSAGE BOARDS, the board IMDB closed down. When the 2 negatives were "I didnt like Lex" He was a minor character in that movie, so no, it wont change that much. You disliked one scene because it was explained that was 10 mins maybe long. No, what youre saying still isnt adding up. Yea and all the DC fans are "honest." I think both sides need to stfu and get off this fanboy bs, and enjoy the films. Youre all so fn worried which is better. Who cares, they're both fun. Yes I explained why. "Wonder Woman: 10/10 Ok, Logan has a high rating, GOTG2, not a bad rating and SM Homecoming has a 8.1 on IMDB atm. GOTG2 has also, an 8.1 atm. Logan has an 8.2 atm. Wonder Woman atm has a 7.9 (As of 7/11/2017) So the 2 films you gave 1's to have higher ratings > wonder woman on IMDB...ouch. Logan you said 2, IMDB = 8.2 SM: Homecoming you said 1, has an 8.1 atm GOTG2 you said 1, has an 8.1 atm WW you said 10, has a 7.9 atm. We already know what youll rate them, no sense in it. And the site you gave said Logan > WW. See, you dont like Wolverine, so youre already going into the film with biases. We disagree on that. Lets see what IMDB thinks Civil War: 7.9 BVS: DOJ - 6.7 Hmmmm....
|
|
ctown28
Sophomore
@ctown28
Posts: 507
Likes: 391
|
Post by ctown28 on Jul 12, 2017 0:51:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Jul 12, 2017 7:10:01 GMT
[quote timestamp="1499787898" source="/post/650205/thread" And non-DC, non-Marvel movies - Sky High and the 2 Kick-Ass movies were entertaining. Power Rangers was mediocre. Max Steel was boring. So let me get this straight. BvS is one of the best CBM ever, so that gets a 6. And Power Rangers is mediocre, so that gets a... what did you give it? Updated list (updates in red): Patriots Day - 6 The Founder - 7 A United Kingdom - 7 Collide - 6 Lavender - 5 The Space Between Us - 5 Logan - 2 Kong: Skull Island - 6 Power Rangers - 6
|
|
|
Post by DSDSquared on Jul 12, 2017 12:09:29 GMT
Only issue is....a few people are agreeing with him. So everyone is lying against you? That's one hell of a conspiracy! How does everything go back to Brady. We are discussing MCU and DC, not Brady. Im not trying to be rude, but you almost come across as a closet Brady fan or have a crush on the man. Every dang time, you bring it to Brady, on any issue too. "Man....I like Texans this year." BRADY CHEATED! "Logan or WW, what was better." BRADY CHEATED Ok, got it, regardless he has 5 rings, no asterisk. You scream asterisk, and when asked to shown an asterisk next to one of his SBowl wins, you cant, why, because it doesnt exist. Regardless, this has nada to do with Tom. BECAUSE THEY ALL SAID IT WAS IN THE IMDB FORUMS, you know, the ones that got closed down! Do you grasp how to read? They said you gave it the 9.5 in the forum. Your 6 doesnt even match up with the review, it isnt logical. Again I gave BVS a 6.5, but gave it a 7 on IMDB, as for your "6" rating, you could have easily changed it. That big 2 negatives to your 6 positives, and your negatives were minor af. "I didnt like Lex." "I didnt like one scene" ONE MINOR LITTLE SCENE, that lasted...5-10 minutes, LOL. WOW...WHAT NEGATIVES! No No movie is perfect, Shawshank and Godfather are the top 2 rated movies on IMDB, and I know I can come up with some BABY MINOR GRIPEs with both movies, and that's all you had with BVS, baby minor gripes. And youre clearly a DC fanboy, so, it is a good name for you. You like Dallas, you like DC comics, probably the one clever thing you did, is your sn. No, youre a Cowboys fan. I dont lie like you do. I say Im a Houston fan, but you think I love NE because I respect Brady, which is beyond goofy. Depends, I prefer to have both, why? You need guys like Rose to get on base. Now Ruths homerun turns into two runs, not one. Regardless, your actions dont show that. Logan a 2 GOTG 1 and 2 you rated a 1 SM Homecoming a 1. You hate Iron Man, Avengers, etc etc etc. So your actions/words speak differently. You dont come across unbiased man. Not when DSD could predict how you'd rate 3 movies, and he is batting a 1.000. OK, you like XMen. Still gave Logan a 2, when even the site you gave out said Logan > WW. Great, but the Superman movies you love, were "okay." Id take XMen or Spider man 1-2 over them. One was good, not great. 2 is my favorite film 3, idk it was good/stupid all in one. It isnt a bad movie, but 2 is by far the best in that. I think all the F4 movies have been extremely underwhelming. Deadpool was a lot of fun. Logan > WW, by the site you gave. Problem with DC is they put too much into 3 characters. Superman/Batman/Wonder Woman. Finally theyre making a JJ movie, but they seem to be copying Avengers. Now youre biases is showing through. No, theyre not. GOTG was awesome. Deadpool was fun af. Avengers, great movie. MCU has more characters > DC. MCU still makes better movies in a whole. Which is why the site you gave out said Logan > WW. Again, youre gonna be biased towards DC, it's hard to take it seriously. *Face palm* MESSAGE BOARD. LIKE WE ARE DOING NOW. You know, the boards IMDB closed down. You just wrote 9.5 omg I did too! See how easy it is to DO ON A MESSAGE BOARD. They werent talking about the official IMDB rankings, theyre obviously were discussing what you rated it ON THE MESSAGE BOARDS, the board IMDB closed down. When the 2 negatives were "I didnt like Lex" He was a minor character in that movie, so no, it wont change that much. You disliked one scene because it was explained that was 10 mins maybe long. No, what youre saying still isnt adding up. Yea and all the DC fans are "honest." I think both sides need to stfu and get off this fanboy bs, and enjoy the films. Youre all so fn worried which is better. Who cares, they're both fun. Yes I explained why. "Wonder Woman: 10/10 Ok, Logan has a high rating, GOTG2, not a bad rating and SM Homecoming has a 8.1 on IMDB atm. GOTG2 has also, an 8.1 atm. Logan has an 8.2 atm. Wonder Woman atm has a 7.9 (As of 7/11/2017) So the 2 films you gave 1's to have higher ratings > wonder woman on IMDB...ouch. Logan you said 2, IMDB = 8.2 SM: Homecoming you said 1, has an 8.1 atm GOTG2 you said 1, has an 8.1 atm WW you said 10, has a 7.9 atm. We already know what youll rate them, no sense in it. And the site you gave said Logan > WW. See, you dont like Wolverine, so youre already going into the film with biases. We disagree on that. Lets see what IMDB thinks Civil War: 7.9 BVS: DOJ - 6.7 Hmmmm.... I give you a lot of props for arguing with this idiot. It will all be for nothing though.
|
|