|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Jul 11, 2017 8:16:26 GMT
For me its Pure Flix. I never seen a good film from them.
Then The Asylum and York.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Jul 11, 2017 9:52:50 GMT
I sometimes hear people call Producer's Releasing Corporation a terrible distributer, as their films were very low-budget and quickly made...
But I like some of their films....they did release the occasional gem.
A far worse distributor of the period was Screen Classics, which gave the world Test Tube Babies (1948), a film so terrible it makes Plan 9 from Outer Space look like Gone with the Wind. Yes, it's THAT bad!
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Jul 11, 2017 10:03:40 GMT
I sometimes hear people call Producer's Releasing Corporation a terrible distributer, as their films were very low-budget and quickly made... But I like some of their films....they did release the occasional gem. A far worse distributor of the period was Screen Classics, which gave the world Test Tube Babies (1948), a film so terrible it makes Plan 9 from Outer Space look like Gone with the Wind. Yes, it's THAT bad! I actually have seen Test Tube Babies and yes it is awful. Its on my worst 100. Number 66 to be exact.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Jul 11, 2017 10:07:21 GMT
I sometimes hear people call Producer's Releasing Corporation a terrible distributer, as their films were very low-budget and quickly made... But I like some of their films....they did release the occasional gem. A far worse distributor of the period was Screen Classics, which gave the world Test Tube Babies (1948), a film so terrible it makes Plan 9 from Outer Space look like Gone with the Wind. Yes, it's THAT bad! I actually have seen Test Tube Babies and yes it is awful. Its on my worst 100. Number 66 to be exact. You mean there are 65 films out there worse than Test Tube Babies? Oh god....that sounds like fun.
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Jul 11, 2017 10:10:42 GMT
I actually have seen Test Tube Babies and yes it is awful. Its on my worst 100. Number 66 to be exact. You mean there are 65 films out there worse than Test Tube Babies? Oh god....that sounds like fun. To me yes. Check it out. www.imdb.com/list/ls064777306/?publish=save
|
|
|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Jul 11, 2017 10:18:01 GMT
Gee, why am I not surprised that a lot of the films on the list are straight-to-video? :-)
|
|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on Jul 13, 2017 5:18:35 GMT
I suppose Pureflix, because while Asylum releases a lot of crap...Most of the time they are pretty aware they're not making anything great to begin with, call it laziness on their part but their model has made them enough to keep going this long. Pureflix is just annoying with their preachy, cringe-fests.
|
|
|
Post by stefancrosscoe on Jul 13, 2017 10:22:46 GMT
The Asylum is bad, but as judgejosephdredd puts it, they are well aware of it and not ashamed of doing the same cheap b-movie/trashy clone/copy of some big budget Hollywood rip-off starring some b-movie/TV-actors that was "big" 20 years ago or more. Pureflix I have not yet encountered, which by the looks here, is probably a good thing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2017 1:15:44 GMT
The Asylum by far.
|
|
|
Post by Primemovermithrax Pejorative on Jul 17, 2017 1:27:17 GMT
The Asylum. They deliberately make bad movies--nothing to be proud of.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Jul 17, 2017 1:33:12 GMT
Some would say the Cannon Group.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew the Swordsman on Jul 17, 2017 16:31:10 GMT
Some would say the Cannon Group. Cannon Group did have a certain charm to them...
|
|