Post by kuatorises on Mar 15, 2017 13:32:54 GMT
is the 3rd highest grossing movie in the franchise.
Into Darkness has the money and good reviws from RT (higher fan than critic reviews), IMDb, and Metacritic to completely disprove your claim.
the 3rd highest grossing movie in the franchise.
www.boxofficemojo.com/franchises/chart/?id=startrek.htm
Adjusted for inflation:
1 Star Trek Par. $298,840,300 $257,730,019 5/8/09
2 Star Trek: The Motion Picture Par. $283,480,300 $82,258,456 12/7/79
3 Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home Par. $249,725,200 $109,713,132 11/26/86
4 Star Trek Into Darkness Par. $236,149,800 $228,778,661 5/16/13
5 Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan Par. $232,175,900 $78,912,963 6/4/82
6 Star Trek III: The Search for Spock Par. $196,867,400 $76,471,046 6/1/84
7 Star Trek: First Contact Par. $179,412,900 $92,027,888 11/22/96
8 Star Trek Beyond Par. $161,441,200 $158,848,340 7/22/16
9 Star Trek: Generations Par. $156,092,300 $75,671,125 11/18/94
10 Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Par. $154,798,200 $74,888,996 12/6/91
11 Star Trek: Insurrection Par. $127,143,700 $70,187,658 12/11/98
12 Star Trek V: The Final Frontier Par. $113,757,400 $52,210,049 6/9/89
13 Star Trek: Nemesis Par. $63,666,500 $43,254,409 12/13/02
2 Star Trek: The Motion Picture Par. $283,480,300 $82,258,456 12/7/79
3 Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home Par. $249,725,200 $109,713,132 11/26/86
4 Star Trek Into Darkness Par. $236,149,800 $228,778,661 5/16/13
5 Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan Par. $232,175,900 $78,912,963 6/4/82
6 Star Trek III: The Search for Spock Par. $196,867,400 $76,471,046 6/1/84
7 Star Trek: First Contact Par. $179,412,900 $92,027,888 11/22/96
8 Star Trek Beyond Par. $161,441,200 $158,848,340 7/22/16
9 Star Trek: Generations Par. $156,092,300 $75,671,125 11/18/94
10 Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Par. $154,798,200 $74,888,996 12/6/91
11 Star Trek: Insurrection Par. $127,143,700 $70,187,658 12/11/98
12 Star Trek V: The Final Frontier Par. $113,757,400 $52,210,049 6/9/89
13 Star Trek: Nemesis Par. $63,666,500 $43,254,409 12/13/02
As for fans (I'm talking longtime Trekkers) reaction to Into Darkness:
‘Star Trek Into Darkness’ Voted Worst ‘Star Trek’ Film By Fans
www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/14/star-trek-into-darkness-worst-film_n_3755769.html
Star Trek Into Darkness' voted worst 'Trek' movie by fans
www.digitalspy.com/movies/star-trek/news/a506769/star-trek-into-darkness-voted-worst-trek-movie-by-fans/
Fans Name 'Star Trek Into Darkness' as the Worst 'Trek' Movie Ever
www.hollywoodreporter.com/heat-vision/fans-name-star-trek-darkness-604978
And here's no talent scumbag hack, Simon Pegg telling longtime Trek fans to go fuck themselves because of the negative reaction to Into Darkness:
www.comicbookmovie.com/sci-fi/star_trek/simon-pegg-has-a-message-for-star-trek-into-darkness-haters-fck-a85789
Also, you're using Rotten Tomato to indicate the success? That's what Face_Palm/Kylo_Ren uses for his stupid Rebels, Clone Wars and Breaking Bad propaganda. I known you for years on IMDB and you're way better than that.
Back to Star Trek Beyond, it had a production budget of $185,000,000 with an additional estimated marketing budget of $160,000,000 = $345,000,000 resulting in a $336,398,312 worldwide by the time it completed it's run in theaters. It's negative 9 million below it's production and marketing costs.
Although I hated all the Abrams' Trek movies, there's no denying that only Trek 09 was a huge success out of the three with Beyond losing money.
No, actually I was using Rotten Tomatoes, and IMDb, and Metacritic.
-At RT, the movie has an 86% from critics and… Wait for it... A 90% from fans.
- At the notoriously rough Metacritic it has a 72 out of 100 from critics and 7.8 out of 10 from the fans.
- At IMDb it has a 7.8 out of 10.