Lucasfilm is Dead Without George

I am worried for this next Indiana Jones sequel. I'm trying to still be hopeful, though. Disney can make a great new action flick if they really want to.

I don't care if this sounds sexist or whatever anymore, but we better not get a female lead in an Indiana Jones movie. We all know that they won't give this franchise up and yet Ford doesn't have too much more time to play a globe-trotting, adventure-seeking archaeologist.

When they inevitably pass the torch to a younger actor, it better be a male. I'm sorry, but that's a deal breaker for me.

By all media accounts-fact is Lucas cannot release a film without it passing the editors of the NWO.

The prequels were about an evil blonde guy. Very standard NWO stuff. Seen Excalibur? The good knights had dark haired-the bad one was blonde (and wears gold--practically a Trump in the making). This anti-white nonsense has been going on for decades.



Do you really think it was only Lucas' idea to have Shia Labouef as Indiana Jones' son (and they wanted to make him the new hero)? That's like having Woody Allen as James Bond. It works as a joke but not for real. But the studio was going to go with it!



We'll never get a faithful version of Dracula for the same reason. Ain't gonna happen. Why? Because the story is about some white guys who protect their women from a swarthy foreigner. I need to rewatch the BBC version of 77 but that was probably the last stab at an accurate version. After that-Dracula had to be the romantic lead or misunderstood outsider (except when he was entertaining Blacula or fighting some kids).

Doc Savage or Flash Gordon--same thing. You wont get a serious faithful version of either. They have to add jokes or make him a goof in some way. Or dye their hair or skin.

Dont blame KK. She is just selected as the face of the SJW agenda-but she takes her marching orders from the Disney management which isn't all that different from the FOX management.

Dont know him, but the real importance is--can the theory be proven false?

No, because it fits into the theory.

NWO theory is that the traditional society is corrupt, white males are bad etc. Multicultural societies work best. The strongest and wisest and good dude is the  alien outsider.

In Star Wars the bad guys are all white men.

Luke is a beta character who saves the rebellion by using the Force (and help from a pirate) to blow up the Death Star.
By contrast, the rich successful black guy with a lobotomized white servant is able to blow up a death star without any help from the Force (granted, he has an asianish alien co-pilot).

In the prequels the bad guy is an old white man.
His henchman is a young white man.
The young white man's teacher is a white man (Kenobi) who fails to teach him well. White man failure.

Who is the coolest, most in charge and supposedly good character? The black jedi Mace Windu who is only defeated by the combined treachery of two white guys.

Oh no, there is nothing to this NWO stuff.

Looks like I know it better than you do.

NWO or Communist takeover or ZOG or Deep State all involve the same elements--the basic idea is that White European societies--specifically a society where white men have authority, must be destroyed.

Star Wars embodies the anti-white conspiracy theory.

Disney under its founder was "anti-NWO" now it is like the flagship corporation of the NWO agenda, seeking to ignore the heritage and audience of its founder and create a globalist monoculture (Michael Eisner has stated it--"being entertainer for the globe").

But the key features are an anti-white perspective.
Fox (despite its news vision, its entertainment shows embody the same anti-white agenda--the Simpsons for example) , Paramount, Universal, Warner's are all philosophically committed to the same NWO agenda.
Basically it is like the Borg, except the Borg are more honest about their intentions.