Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 5, 2017 21:14:28 GMT
Like, say you walked in on a grown man forcing a 6 year old to have sex with him. Would you be able to restrain your anger?
Or would you have the opinion that you’re above a human, and you aren’t a judge or executioner.
|
|
|
|
Post by MCDemuth on Oct 5, 2017 22:36:39 GMT
If Superman were me, The only time that I would consider killing someone would be if it meant it was the only way to prevent the deaths of innocent people.
For example, looking at recent news for inspiration:
A (super criminal) gunman is on his way to a community event to kill a bunch of innocent spectators... And If Superman does nothing, then the (super criminal) gunman WILL succeed in shooting and killing 100s of people... But if the ONLY way that Superman can stop the (super criminal) gunman, is to kill him first, then it would be justified!
If there is more than one way to stop the (super criminal) gunman, then I would choose to try less violent options first, IF I had time to do so.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2017 5:57:12 GMT
Oh, look, mello's trying to justify the murderous and cold Kal-El of Hack Snyder's films again.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 7, 2017 0:54:27 GMT
Humans probably not. Someone like Zod or Darkseid that can take it, if I had to.
|
|
|
|
Post by PreachCaleb on Oct 10, 2017 13:05:09 GMT
If Superman were me, The only time that I would consider killing someone would be if it meant it was the only way to prevent the deaths of innocent people. For example, looking at recent news for inspiration: A (super criminal) gunman is on his way to a community event to kill a bunch of innocent spectators... And If Superman does nothing, then the (super criminal) gunman WILL succeed in shooting and killing 100s of people... But if the ONLY way that Superman can stop the (super criminal) gunman, is to kill him first, then it would be justified! If there is more than one way to stop the (super criminal) gunman, then I would choose to try less violent options first, IF I had time to do so. Freeze the gun. Destroy the gun. Catch all the bullets. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 10, 2017 16:19:52 GMT
If Superman were me, The only time that I would consider killing someone would be if it meant it was the only way to prevent the deaths of innocent people. For example, looking at recent news for inspiration: A (super criminal) gunman is on his way to a community event to kill a bunch of innocent spectators... And If Superman does nothing, then the (super criminal) gunman WILL succeed in shooting and killing 100s of people... But if the ONLY way that Superman can stop the (super criminal) gunman, is to kill him first, then it would be justified! If there is more than one way to stop the (super criminal) gunman, then I would choose to try less violent options first, IF I had time to do so. Freeze the gun. Destroy the gun. Catch all the bullets. Yep. That's what Superman would do. Unfortunately, mello's doesn't actually want you to answer with what Superman would do. He wants to answer with what the DCEU's Kal-El would do. |
|
