|
Post by merh on Nov 18, 2017 11:34:31 GMT
I don't think they're biased, I do find some things odd though. www.rottentomatoes.com/m/superman_man_of_steel/Man of Steel has an average rating of 6.2/10. Among Top Critics, the average is a 6.1/10. www.rottentomatoes.com/m/thor_the_dark_world/Then you have Thor Dark World which also has an average rating of 6.2/10 but among Top Critics it has an inferior average of 5.3/10. www.rottentomatoes.com/m/the_incredible_hulk/The Incredible Hulk again has the exact same average rating of 6.2/10 with an inferior Top Critics average of 5.6/10. So Man of Steel has the exact same overall average rating but a superior average among Top Critics and yet Man of Steel has a 55% but Thor Dark World has a 66% and Incredible Hulk has a 67%. Technically Man of Steel has the overall best reviews of the three on average yet it's the one that comes up short. If you think that's odd, this is even more odd: RT posting fake reviews of Justice League.
You're going to have to reconsider your stance on RT not being biased against DC when RT has now been exposed as posting fake reviews of Justice League using the account of someone who hadn't posted his review.
RT didn't take the existing review?
|
|
|
Post by kuatorises on Nov 20, 2017 16:15:17 GMT
This is nonsense that idiots like you will use as some lame argument. Grow up, please. And for the record, RT fans are loving the movie. The difference between fan and critic opinion is gigantic. By lame argument, do you mean reviews and a disappointing box office?
|
|
northernlad
Sophomore
@northernlad
Posts: 898
Likes: 620
|
Post by northernlad on Nov 20, 2017 17:12:37 GMT
The fact is, as is the case with Wonder Woman, when they show respect to their source material and their characters and they take their time with it, the end result fairs so much better than when they hurriedly put things together and place these characters in the wrong hands.
|
|