|
Post by politicidal on Apr 4, 2018 3:09:49 GMT
..and he says his vision of Jurassic Park was far darker than what Spielberg wound up filming. James Cameron's version of "Jurassic Park" would have been much darker than Steven Spielberg's, at least according to Cameron himself.
The iconic director of "Aliens," "Titanic," and "Avatar" told HuffPost UK that he had always wanted to adapt "Jurassic Park." Cameron said he tried to buy the rights to the novel by Michael Crichton, but Spielberg "beat me to it by a few hours."
But it was all for the best, according to Cameron. markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/james-cameron-tried-to-buy-the-jurassic-park-book-rights-2018-4-1020390912"When I saw the film, I realized that I was not the right person to make the film, he was," Cameron said. "Because he made a dinosaur movie for kids, and mine would have been 'Aliens' with dinosaurs, and that wouldn't have been fair ... Dinosaurs are for 8 year olds. We can all enjoy it, too, but kids get dinosaurs and they should not have been excluded for that. His sensibility was right for that film, I'd have gone further, nastier, much nastier."
|
|
|
Post by kleinreturns on Apr 4, 2018 5:33:20 GMT
Interesting.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 4, 2018 12:58:42 GMT
He's actually not bad for a straight adaptation of the original book, which is very very dark compared with the movie and its attitude does lend itself to Cameron's style of filmmaking. Maybe if HBO ever remade Jurassic Park as a miniseries or a show in the same vein as Westworld.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2018 18:16:19 GMT
I love Spielberg's version so much that I find it disturbing to imagine anyone else in the director's chair. It might have been cool to see Caneron direct one of the sequels though.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 7, 2018 23:29:38 GMT
I love Spielberg's version so much that I find it disturbing to imagine anyone else in the director's chair. It might have been cool to see Caneron direct one of the sequels though. That would have been cool actually.
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Apr 18, 2018 9:21:54 GMT
It could be done as the book is way darker than the movie. Nedry's death is brutal for instance...
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Jun 16, 2019 16:00:34 GMT
I'd love to see a more faithful adaption of the book done. There's a bunch of brutal deaths I'd love to see done on the big screen!
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Jun 17, 2019 18:05:34 GMT
Cameron probably could have made the better movie to be honest but the one we got is a fantastic classic already so it's all good.
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Jun 17, 2019 18:31:55 GMT
The book isn't very good--the focus on children is a real drag for action. The movie is too faithful to the book but because Spielberg hated stop motion he had the dino sequences framed to emphasize the robots--so that meant counter intuitive things like the triceratops on its back and fleeting glimpses of other dinosaurs as they traveled the park. The one advantage of Cameron for it would have been better dino sequences. Spielberg loathed stop motion--Cameron did not, so he would have designed the dinosaur sequences to be a better mix of live-action and puppets.
|
|