|
Post by brownstones on Mar 14, 2017 0:49:43 GMT
Kingsman: haven't seen it. X-Men: First Class: no, I don't like it. Kick Ass: just no. Stardust: long enough ago as to be a non-factor. Plus, I don't like this Superman and I have no desire to see him continue being dark and brooding. a non factor? he made a lovely fantasy film.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 0:54:10 GMT
Kingsman: haven't seen it. X-Men: First Class: no, I don't like it. Kick Ass: just no. Stardust: long enough ago as to be a non-factor. Plus, I don't like this Superman and I have no desire to see him continue being dark and brooding. a non factor? he made a lovely fantasy film. A decade ago. That's not an accurate measuring stick of what the man can do now. I'm looking at his resume right now, and its full of things I'm either not interested in or not impressed by with few exceptions.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 14, 2017 0:57:03 GMT
a non factor? he made a lovely fantasy film. A decade ago. That's not an accurate measuring stick of what the man can do now. I'm looking at his resume right now, and its full of things I'm either not interested in or not impressed by with few exceptions. he made a great film then, me made a great film in 2015, and 2 good films between (Aaron Taylor Johnson rubs me the wrong way) he seems consistent to me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 0:58:42 GMT
Not by my measure. In any case, his Superman will just be the same mopey pretentious lame excuse of an icon we've been saddled with for a while now. Not interested.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 14, 2017 1:05:15 GMT
Not by my measure. In any case, his Superman will just be the same mopey pretentious lame excuse of an icon we've been saddled with for a while now. Not interested. ...................................*sigh* guess you haven't seen Matthew Vaughn's films, because they are the furthest thing from whatever you have a problem with.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 1:06:44 GMT
I've seen them, and I've seen the template the man has to work off of. He won't be able to just make Superman the way he's supposed to be easily.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 14, 2017 1:11:50 GMT
I've seen them, and I've seen the template the man has to work off of. He won't be able to just make Superman the way he's supposed to be easily. okay, so i'm guessing only a full reboot will change your mind?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 1:12:09 GMT
Yes.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 14, 2017 1:18:25 GMT
okay, see you in 8 years.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 1:20:58 GMT
okay, see you in 8 years. Inquiry: supposed Vaughn does direct the film. What is to stop Warner from meddling as they've taken to with other films? Even if Vaughn attempts to fix this Superman, he's essentially polishing a turd. A zebra can't change its stripes.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 14, 2017 1:31:33 GMT
okay, see you in 8 years. Inquiry: supposed Vaughn does direct the film. What is to stop Warner from meddling as they've taken to with other films? Even if Vaughn attempts to fix this Superman, he's essentially polishing a turd. A zebra can't change its stripes. nothing really since it's their money, however they're trying to get directors such as Gibson, Vaughn, Reeves (with Affleck behind the scenes somehow...maybe) who are known for having a strong track record, and who will probably demand final cut, and it would be in WB's best interest to allow them to do just that. because if people turned on WB after seeing the director's cut of BvS and hearing how WB chopped and destroyed Ayer's cut......they probably would rather steer clear of that situation again. and WB knows their films aren't doing gangbusters, so to allow strong directors to help steer their ship would be in their best interest. regarding the second part, if you hate it you hate it, and i'm sorry I suppose? so better luck in a decade.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 1:34:18 GMT
Alright, next inquiry: why do you have so much faith he'll be able to fix Snyder's mess with the Superman character? You DO realize he has a tall order here, correct?
|
|
|
Post by Jerk on Mar 14, 2017 7:42:45 GMT
Alright, next inquiry: why do you have so much faith he'll be able to fix Snyder's mess with the Superman character? You DO realize he has a tall order here, correct? You certainly have a lot to say on the matter for someone that is "not interested"
|
|
|
Post by miike80 on Mar 14, 2017 8:13:16 GMT
He would bring the right balance, and he might direct a great Superman movie. if only the studio would not interfere
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 14:17:55 GMT
And that is your preference. See how that works? I'm not calling you a Marveltard, a Marvel Troll, names, etc... If you aren't interested in a Superman film, fine. But just remember this when people like me say we aren't interested in MCU films. For example, I'm 10x more interested in Man of Steel 2 than Avengers Infinity Wars.
|
|
|
Post by brownstones on Mar 14, 2017 16:37:56 GMT
Alright, next inquiry: why do you have so much faith he'll be able to fix Snyder's mess with the Superman character? You DO realize he has a tall order here, correct? because I don't have a disdain for the dceu?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 16:40:10 GMT
Alright, next inquiry: why do you have so much faith he'll be able to fix Snyder's mess with the Superman character? You DO realize he has a tall order here, correct? because I don't have a disdain for the dceu? You should, because it's done nothing but ruin iconic characters.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 16:41:13 GMT
Alright, next inquiry: why do you have so much faith he'll be able to fix Snyder's mess with the Superman character? You DO realize he has a tall order here, correct? You certainly have a lot to say on the matter for someone that is "not interested" I'm sorry, but that doesn't answer my question. Try again.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 16:42:28 GMT
And that is your preference. See how that works? I'm not calling you a Marveltard, a Marvel Troll, names, etc... If you aren't interested in a Superman film, fine. But just remember this when people like me say we aren't interested in MCU films. For example, I'm 10x more interested in Man of Steel 2 than Avengers Infinity Wars. Yes, well, you are a non-factor in any comic book movies discussion.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 14, 2017 16:43:43 GMT
Marvel-Only Bot.
|
|